Cargando…
Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
In the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process, the operating conditions are essential in determining laser-induced keyhole regimes based on the thermal distribution. These regimes, classified into shallow and deep keyholes, control the probability and defects formation intensity in the LPBF process....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11123284 |
_version_ | 1784622402530967552 |
---|---|
author | Ur Rehman, Asif Mahmood, Muhammad Arif Pitir, Fatih Salamci, Metin Uymaz Popescu, Andrei C. Mihailescu, Ion N. |
author_facet | Ur Rehman, Asif Mahmood, Muhammad Arif Pitir, Fatih Salamci, Metin Uymaz Popescu, Andrei C. Mihailescu, Ion N. |
author_sort | Ur Rehman, Asif |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process, the operating conditions are essential in determining laser-induced keyhole regimes based on the thermal distribution. These regimes, classified into shallow and deep keyholes, control the probability and defects formation intensity in the LPBF process. To study and control the keyhole in the LPBF process, mathematical and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are presented. For CFD, the volume of fluid method with the discrete element modeling technique was used, while a mathematical model was developed by including the laser beam absorption by the powder bed voids and surface. The dynamic melt pool behavior is explored in detail. Quantitative comparisons are made among experimental, CFD simulation and analytical computing results leading to a good correspondence. In LPBF, the temperature around the laser irradiation zone rises rapidly compared to the surroundings in the powder layer due to the high thermal resistance and the air between the powder particles, resulting in a slow travel of laser transverse heat waves. In LPBF, the keyhole can be classified into shallow and deep keyhole mode, controlled by the energy density. Increasing the energy density, the shallow keyhole mode transforms into the deep keyhole mode. The energy density in a deep keyhole is higher due to the multiple reflections and concentrations of secondary reflected beams within the keyhole, causing the material to vaporize quickly. Due to an elevated temperature distribution in deep keyhole mode, the probability of pores forming is much higher than in a shallow keyhole as the liquid material is close to the vaporization temperature. When the temperature increases rapidly, the material density drops quickly, thus, raising the fluid volume due to the specific heat and fusion latent heat. In return, this lowers the surface tension and affects the melt pool uniformity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8707298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87072982021-12-25 Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation Ur Rehman, Asif Mahmood, Muhammad Arif Pitir, Fatih Salamci, Metin Uymaz Popescu, Andrei C. Mihailescu, Ion N. Nanomaterials (Basel) Article In the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process, the operating conditions are essential in determining laser-induced keyhole regimes based on the thermal distribution. These regimes, classified into shallow and deep keyholes, control the probability and defects formation intensity in the LPBF process. To study and control the keyhole in the LPBF process, mathematical and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are presented. For CFD, the volume of fluid method with the discrete element modeling technique was used, while a mathematical model was developed by including the laser beam absorption by the powder bed voids and surface. The dynamic melt pool behavior is explored in detail. Quantitative comparisons are made among experimental, CFD simulation and analytical computing results leading to a good correspondence. In LPBF, the temperature around the laser irradiation zone rises rapidly compared to the surroundings in the powder layer due to the high thermal resistance and the air between the powder particles, resulting in a slow travel of laser transverse heat waves. In LPBF, the keyhole can be classified into shallow and deep keyhole mode, controlled by the energy density. Increasing the energy density, the shallow keyhole mode transforms into the deep keyhole mode. The energy density in a deep keyhole is higher due to the multiple reflections and concentrations of secondary reflected beams within the keyhole, causing the material to vaporize quickly. Due to an elevated temperature distribution in deep keyhole mode, the probability of pores forming is much higher than in a shallow keyhole as the liquid material is close to the vaporization temperature. When the temperature increases rapidly, the material density drops quickly, thus, raising the fluid volume due to the specific heat and fusion latent heat. In return, this lowers the surface tension and affects the melt pool uniformity. MDPI 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8707298/ /pubmed/34947634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11123284 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ur Rehman, Asif Mahmood, Muhammad Arif Pitir, Fatih Salamci, Metin Uymaz Popescu, Andrei C. Mihailescu, Ion N. Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation |
title | Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation |
title_full | Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation |
title_fullStr | Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation |
title_short | Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation |
title_sort | keyhole formation by laser drilling in laser powder bed fusion of ti6al4v biomedical alloy: mesoscopic computational fluid dynamics simulation versus mathematical modelling using empirical validation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11123284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT urrehmanasif keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation AT mahmoodmuhammadarif keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation AT pitirfatih keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation AT salamcimetinuymaz keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation AT popescuandreic keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation AT mihailescuionn keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation |