Cargando…

Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation

In the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process, the operating conditions are essential in determining laser-induced keyhole regimes based on the thermal distribution. These regimes, classified into shallow and deep keyholes, control the probability and defects formation intensity in the LPBF process....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ur Rehman, Asif, Mahmood, Muhammad Arif, Pitir, Fatih, Salamci, Metin Uymaz, Popescu, Andrei C., Mihailescu, Ion N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947634
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11123284
_version_ 1784622402530967552
author Ur Rehman, Asif
Mahmood, Muhammad Arif
Pitir, Fatih
Salamci, Metin Uymaz
Popescu, Andrei C.
Mihailescu, Ion N.
author_facet Ur Rehman, Asif
Mahmood, Muhammad Arif
Pitir, Fatih
Salamci, Metin Uymaz
Popescu, Andrei C.
Mihailescu, Ion N.
author_sort Ur Rehman, Asif
collection PubMed
description In the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process, the operating conditions are essential in determining laser-induced keyhole regimes based on the thermal distribution. These regimes, classified into shallow and deep keyholes, control the probability and defects formation intensity in the LPBF process. To study and control the keyhole in the LPBF process, mathematical and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are presented. For CFD, the volume of fluid method with the discrete element modeling technique was used, while a mathematical model was developed by including the laser beam absorption by the powder bed voids and surface. The dynamic melt pool behavior is explored in detail. Quantitative comparisons are made among experimental, CFD simulation and analytical computing results leading to a good correspondence. In LPBF, the temperature around the laser irradiation zone rises rapidly compared to the surroundings in the powder layer due to the high thermal resistance and the air between the powder particles, resulting in a slow travel of laser transverse heat waves. In LPBF, the keyhole can be classified into shallow and deep keyhole mode, controlled by the energy density. Increasing the energy density, the shallow keyhole mode transforms into the deep keyhole mode. The energy density in a deep keyhole is higher due to the multiple reflections and concentrations of secondary reflected beams within the keyhole, causing the material to vaporize quickly. Due to an elevated temperature distribution in deep keyhole mode, the probability of pores forming is much higher than in a shallow keyhole as the liquid material is close to the vaporization temperature. When the temperature increases rapidly, the material density drops quickly, thus, raising the fluid volume due to the specific heat and fusion latent heat. In return, this lowers the surface tension and affects the melt pool uniformity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8707298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87072982021-12-25 Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation Ur Rehman, Asif Mahmood, Muhammad Arif Pitir, Fatih Salamci, Metin Uymaz Popescu, Andrei C. Mihailescu, Ion N. Nanomaterials (Basel) Article In the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process, the operating conditions are essential in determining laser-induced keyhole regimes based on the thermal distribution. These regimes, classified into shallow and deep keyholes, control the probability and defects formation intensity in the LPBF process. To study and control the keyhole in the LPBF process, mathematical and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are presented. For CFD, the volume of fluid method with the discrete element modeling technique was used, while a mathematical model was developed by including the laser beam absorption by the powder bed voids and surface. The dynamic melt pool behavior is explored in detail. Quantitative comparisons are made among experimental, CFD simulation and analytical computing results leading to a good correspondence. In LPBF, the temperature around the laser irradiation zone rises rapidly compared to the surroundings in the powder layer due to the high thermal resistance and the air between the powder particles, resulting in a slow travel of laser transverse heat waves. In LPBF, the keyhole can be classified into shallow and deep keyhole mode, controlled by the energy density. Increasing the energy density, the shallow keyhole mode transforms into the deep keyhole mode. The energy density in a deep keyhole is higher due to the multiple reflections and concentrations of secondary reflected beams within the keyhole, causing the material to vaporize quickly. Due to an elevated temperature distribution in deep keyhole mode, the probability of pores forming is much higher than in a shallow keyhole as the liquid material is close to the vaporization temperature. When the temperature increases rapidly, the material density drops quickly, thus, raising the fluid volume due to the specific heat and fusion latent heat. In return, this lowers the surface tension and affects the melt pool uniformity. MDPI 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8707298/ /pubmed/34947634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11123284 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ur Rehman, Asif
Mahmood, Muhammad Arif
Pitir, Fatih
Salamci, Metin Uymaz
Popescu, Andrei C.
Mihailescu, Ion N.
Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title_full Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title_fullStr Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title_full_unstemmed Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title_short Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title_sort keyhole formation by laser drilling in laser powder bed fusion of ti6al4v biomedical alloy: mesoscopic computational fluid dynamics simulation versus mathematical modelling using empirical validation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947634
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11123284
work_keys_str_mv AT urrehmanasif keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation
AT mahmoodmuhammadarif keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation
AT pitirfatih keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation
AT salamcimetinuymaz keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation
AT popescuandreic keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation
AT mihailescuionn keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation