Cargando…

Traditional Artificial Neural Networks Versus Deep Learning in Optimization of Material Aspects of 3D Printing

3D printing of assistive devices requires optimization of material selection, raw materials formulas, and complex printing processes that have to balance a high number of variable but highly correlated variables. The performance of patient-specific 3D printed solutions is still limited by both the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rojek, Izabela, Mikołajewski, Dariusz, Kotlarz, Piotr, Tyburek, Krzysztof, Kopowski, Jakub, Dostatni, Ewa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247625
_version_ 1784622423831740416
author Rojek, Izabela
Mikołajewski, Dariusz
Kotlarz, Piotr
Tyburek, Krzysztof
Kopowski, Jakub
Dostatni, Ewa
author_facet Rojek, Izabela
Mikołajewski, Dariusz
Kotlarz, Piotr
Tyburek, Krzysztof
Kopowski, Jakub
Dostatni, Ewa
author_sort Rojek, Izabela
collection PubMed
description 3D printing of assistive devices requires optimization of material selection, raw materials formulas, and complex printing processes that have to balance a high number of variable but highly correlated variables. The performance of patient-specific 3D printed solutions is still limited by both the increasing number of available materials with different properties (including multi-material printing) and the large number of process features that need to be optimized. The main purpose of this study is to compare the optimization of 3D printing properties toward the maximum tensile force of an exoskeleton sample based on two different approaches: traditional artificial neural networks (ANNs) and a deep learning (DL) approach based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Compared with the results from the traditional ANN approach, optimization based on DL decreased the speed of the calculations by up to 1.5 times with the same print quality, improved the quality, decreased the MSE, and a set of printing parameters not previously determined by trial and error was also identified. The above-mentioned results show that DL is an effective tool with significant potential for wide application in the planning and optimization of material properties in the 3D printing process. Further research is needed to apply low-cost but more computationally efficient solutions to multi-tasking and multi-material additive manufacturing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8707385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87073852021-12-25 Traditional Artificial Neural Networks Versus Deep Learning in Optimization of Material Aspects of 3D Printing Rojek, Izabela Mikołajewski, Dariusz Kotlarz, Piotr Tyburek, Krzysztof Kopowski, Jakub Dostatni, Ewa Materials (Basel) Article 3D printing of assistive devices requires optimization of material selection, raw materials formulas, and complex printing processes that have to balance a high number of variable but highly correlated variables. The performance of patient-specific 3D printed solutions is still limited by both the increasing number of available materials with different properties (including multi-material printing) and the large number of process features that need to be optimized. The main purpose of this study is to compare the optimization of 3D printing properties toward the maximum tensile force of an exoskeleton sample based on two different approaches: traditional artificial neural networks (ANNs) and a deep learning (DL) approach based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Compared with the results from the traditional ANN approach, optimization based on DL decreased the speed of the calculations by up to 1.5 times with the same print quality, improved the quality, decreased the MSE, and a set of printing parameters not previously determined by trial and error was also identified. The above-mentioned results show that DL is an effective tool with significant potential for wide application in the planning and optimization of material properties in the 3D printing process. Further research is needed to apply low-cost but more computationally efficient solutions to multi-tasking and multi-material additive manufacturing. MDPI 2021-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8707385/ /pubmed/34947222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247625 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rojek, Izabela
Mikołajewski, Dariusz
Kotlarz, Piotr
Tyburek, Krzysztof
Kopowski, Jakub
Dostatni, Ewa
Traditional Artificial Neural Networks Versus Deep Learning in Optimization of Material Aspects of 3D Printing
title Traditional Artificial Neural Networks Versus Deep Learning in Optimization of Material Aspects of 3D Printing
title_full Traditional Artificial Neural Networks Versus Deep Learning in Optimization of Material Aspects of 3D Printing
title_fullStr Traditional Artificial Neural Networks Versus Deep Learning in Optimization of Material Aspects of 3D Printing
title_full_unstemmed Traditional Artificial Neural Networks Versus Deep Learning in Optimization of Material Aspects of 3D Printing
title_short Traditional Artificial Neural Networks Versus Deep Learning in Optimization of Material Aspects of 3D Printing
title_sort traditional artificial neural networks versus deep learning in optimization of material aspects of 3d printing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247625
work_keys_str_mv AT rojekizabela traditionalartificialneuralnetworksversusdeeplearninginoptimizationofmaterialaspectsof3dprinting
AT mikołajewskidariusz traditionalartificialneuralnetworksversusdeeplearninginoptimizationofmaterialaspectsof3dprinting
AT kotlarzpiotr traditionalartificialneuralnetworksversusdeeplearninginoptimizationofmaterialaspectsof3dprinting
AT tyburekkrzysztof traditionalartificialneuralnetworksversusdeeplearninginoptimizationofmaterialaspectsof3dprinting
AT kopowskijakub traditionalartificialneuralnetworksversusdeeplearninginoptimizationofmaterialaspectsof3dprinting
AT dostatniewa traditionalartificialneuralnetworksversusdeeplearninginoptimizationofmaterialaspectsof3dprinting