Cargando…

Computational Studies of Au(I) and Au(III) Anticancer MetalLodrugs: A Survey

Owing to the growing hardware capabilities and the enhancing efficacy of computational methodologies, computational chemistry approaches have constantly become more important in the development of novel anticancer metallodrugs. Besides traditional Pt-based drugs, inorganic and organometallic complex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tolbatov, Iogann, Marrone, Alessandro, Coletti, Cecilia, Re, Nazzareno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946684
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247600
_version_ 1784622430309842944
author Tolbatov, Iogann
Marrone, Alessandro
Coletti, Cecilia
Re, Nazzareno
author_facet Tolbatov, Iogann
Marrone, Alessandro
Coletti, Cecilia
Re, Nazzareno
author_sort Tolbatov, Iogann
collection PubMed
description Owing to the growing hardware capabilities and the enhancing efficacy of computational methodologies, computational chemistry approaches have constantly become more important in the development of novel anticancer metallodrugs. Besides traditional Pt-based drugs, inorganic and organometallic complexes of other transition metals are showing increasing potential in the treatment of cancer. Among them, Au(I)- and Au(III)-based compounds are promising candidates due to the strong affinity of Au(I) cations to cysteine and selenocysteine side chains of the protein residues and to Au(III) complexes being more labile and prone to the reduction to either Au(I) or Au(0) in the physiological milieu. A correct prediction of metal complexes’ properties and of their bonding interactions with potential ligands requires QM computations, usually at the ab initio or DFT level. However, MM, MD, and docking approaches can also give useful information on their binding site on large biomolecular targets, such as proteins or DNA, provided a careful parametrization of the metal force field is employed. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent computational studies of Au(I) and Au(III) antitumor compounds and of their interactions with biomolecular targets, such as sulfur- and selenium-containing enzymes, like glutathione reductases, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione-S-transferase, cysteine protease, thioredoxin reductase and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8707411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87074112021-12-25 Computational Studies of Au(I) and Au(III) Anticancer MetalLodrugs: A Survey Tolbatov, Iogann Marrone, Alessandro Coletti, Cecilia Re, Nazzareno Molecules Review Owing to the growing hardware capabilities and the enhancing efficacy of computational methodologies, computational chemistry approaches have constantly become more important in the development of novel anticancer metallodrugs. Besides traditional Pt-based drugs, inorganic and organometallic complexes of other transition metals are showing increasing potential in the treatment of cancer. Among them, Au(I)- and Au(III)-based compounds are promising candidates due to the strong affinity of Au(I) cations to cysteine and selenocysteine side chains of the protein residues and to Au(III) complexes being more labile and prone to the reduction to either Au(I) or Au(0) in the physiological milieu. A correct prediction of metal complexes’ properties and of their bonding interactions with potential ligands requires QM computations, usually at the ab initio or DFT level. However, MM, MD, and docking approaches can also give useful information on their binding site on large biomolecular targets, such as proteins or DNA, provided a careful parametrization of the metal force field is employed. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent computational studies of Au(I) and Au(III) antitumor compounds and of their interactions with biomolecular targets, such as sulfur- and selenium-containing enzymes, like glutathione reductases, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione-S-transferase, cysteine protease, thioredoxin reductase and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1. MDPI 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8707411/ /pubmed/34946684 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247600 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tolbatov, Iogann
Marrone, Alessandro
Coletti, Cecilia
Re, Nazzareno
Computational Studies of Au(I) and Au(III) Anticancer MetalLodrugs: A Survey
title Computational Studies of Au(I) and Au(III) Anticancer MetalLodrugs: A Survey
title_full Computational Studies of Au(I) and Au(III) Anticancer MetalLodrugs: A Survey
title_fullStr Computational Studies of Au(I) and Au(III) Anticancer MetalLodrugs: A Survey
title_full_unstemmed Computational Studies of Au(I) and Au(III) Anticancer MetalLodrugs: A Survey
title_short Computational Studies of Au(I) and Au(III) Anticancer MetalLodrugs: A Survey
title_sort computational studies of au(i) and au(iii) anticancer metallodrugs: a survey
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946684
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247600
work_keys_str_mv AT tolbatoviogann computationalstudiesofauiandauiiianticancermetallodrugsasurvey
AT marronealessandro computationalstudiesofauiandauiiianticancermetallodrugsasurvey
AT coletticecilia computationalstudiesofauiandauiiianticancermetallodrugsasurvey
AT renazzareno computationalstudiesofauiandauiiianticancermetallodrugsasurvey