Cargando…

A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care

Background: We validated a new noninvasive tool (B4C) to assess intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) morphology in a set of neurocritical patients, correlating the data with ICPW obtained from invasive catheter monitoring. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing invasive intracranial pressure (I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brasil, Sérgio, Solla, Davi Jorge Fontoura, Nogueira, Ricardo de Carvalho, Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen, Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sá, Paiva, Wellingson da Silva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121302
_version_ 1784622495540707328
author Brasil, Sérgio
Solla, Davi Jorge Fontoura
Nogueira, Ricardo de Carvalho
Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sá
Paiva, Wellingson da Silva
author_facet Brasil, Sérgio
Solla, Davi Jorge Fontoura
Nogueira, Ricardo de Carvalho
Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sá
Paiva, Wellingson da Silva
author_sort Brasil, Sérgio
collection PubMed
description Background: We validated a new noninvasive tool (B4C) to assess intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) morphology in a set of neurocritical patients, correlating the data with ICPW obtained from invasive catheter monitoring. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring were consecutively evaluated using the B4C sensor. Ultrasound-guided manual internal jugular vein (IJV) compression was performed to elevate ICP from the baseline. ICP values, amplitudes, and time intervals (P2/P1 ratio and time-to-peak [TTP]) between the ICP and B4C waveform peaks were analyzed. Results: Among 41 patients, the main causes for ICP monitoring included traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and stroke. Bland–Altman’s plot indicated agreement between the ICPW parameters obtained using both techniques. The strongest Pearson’s correlation for P2/P1 and TTP was observed among patients with no cranial damage (r = 0.72 and 0.85, respectively) to the detriment of those who have undergone craniotomies or craniectomies. P2/P1 values of 1 were equivalent between the two techniques (area under the receiver operator curve [AUROC], 0.9) whereas B4C cut-off 1.2 was predictive of intracranial hypertension (AUROC 0.9, p < 000.1 for ICP > 20 mmHg). Conclusion: B4C provided biometric amplitude ratios correlated with ICPW variation morphology and is useful for noninvasive critical care monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8707681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87076812021-12-25 A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care Brasil, Sérgio Solla, Davi Jorge Fontoura Nogueira, Ricardo de Carvalho Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sá Paiva, Wellingson da Silva J Pers Med Article Background: We validated a new noninvasive tool (B4C) to assess intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) morphology in a set of neurocritical patients, correlating the data with ICPW obtained from invasive catheter monitoring. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring were consecutively evaluated using the B4C sensor. Ultrasound-guided manual internal jugular vein (IJV) compression was performed to elevate ICP from the baseline. ICP values, amplitudes, and time intervals (P2/P1 ratio and time-to-peak [TTP]) between the ICP and B4C waveform peaks were analyzed. Results: Among 41 patients, the main causes for ICP monitoring included traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and stroke. Bland–Altman’s plot indicated agreement between the ICPW parameters obtained using both techniques. The strongest Pearson’s correlation for P2/P1 and TTP was observed among patients with no cranial damage (r = 0.72 and 0.85, respectively) to the detriment of those who have undergone craniotomies or craniectomies. P2/P1 values of 1 were equivalent between the two techniques (area under the receiver operator curve [AUROC], 0.9) whereas B4C cut-off 1.2 was predictive of intracranial hypertension (AUROC 0.9, p < 000.1 for ICP > 20 mmHg). Conclusion: B4C provided biometric amplitude ratios correlated with ICPW variation morphology and is useful for noninvasive critical care monitoring. MDPI 2021-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8707681/ /pubmed/34945774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121302 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brasil, Sérgio
Solla, Davi Jorge Fontoura
Nogueira, Ricardo de Carvalho
Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sá
Paiva, Wellingson da Silva
A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care
title A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care
title_full A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care
title_fullStr A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care
title_short A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care
title_sort novel noninvasive technique for intracranial pressure waveform monitoring in critical care
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121302
work_keys_str_mv AT brasilsergio anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT solladavijorgefontoura anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT nogueiraricardodecarvalho anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT teixeiramanoeljacobsen anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT malbouissonluizmarcelosa anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT paivawellingsondasilva anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT brasilsergio novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT solladavijorgefontoura novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT nogueiraricardodecarvalho novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT teixeiramanoeljacobsen novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT malbouissonluizmarcelosa novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare
AT paivawellingsondasilva novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare