Cargando…
A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care
Background: We validated a new noninvasive tool (B4C) to assess intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) morphology in a set of neurocritical patients, correlating the data with ICPW obtained from invasive catheter monitoring. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing invasive intracranial pressure (I...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121302 |
_version_ | 1784622495540707328 |
---|---|
author | Brasil, Sérgio Solla, Davi Jorge Fontoura Nogueira, Ricardo de Carvalho Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sá Paiva, Wellingson da Silva |
author_facet | Brasil, Sérgio Solla, Davi Jorge Fontoura Nogueira, Ricardo de Carvalho Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sá Paiva, Wellingson da Silva |
author_sort | Brasil, Sérgio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: We validated a new noninvasive tool (B4C) to assess intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) morphology in a set of neurocritical patients, correlating the data with ICPW obtained from invasive catheter monitoring. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring were consecutively evaluated using the B4C sensor. Ultrasound-guided manual internal jugular vein (IJV) compression was performed to elevate ICP from the baseline. ICP values, amplitudes, and time intervals (P2/P1 ratio and time-to-peak [TTP]) between the ICP and B4C waveform peaks were analyzed. Results: Among 41 patients, the main causes for ICP monitoring included traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and stroke. Bland–Altman’s plot indicated agreement between the ICPW parameters obtained using both techniques. The strongest Pearson’s correlation for P2/P1 and TTP was observed among patients with no cranial damage (r = 0.72 and 0.85, respectively) to the detriment of those who have undergone craniotomies or craniectomies. P2/P1 values of 1 were equivalent between the two techniques (area under the receiver operator curve [AUROC], 0.9) whereas B4C cut-off 1.2 was predictive of intracranial hypertension (AUROC 0.9, p < 000.1 for ICP > 20 mmHg). Conclusion: B4C provided biometric amplitude ratios correlated with ICPW variation morphology and is useful for noninvasive critical care monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8707681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87076812021-12-25 A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care Brasil, Sérgio Solla, Davi Jorge Fontoura Nogueira, Ricardo de Carvalho Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sá Paiva, Wellingson da Silva J Pers Med Article Background: We validated a new noninvasive tool (B4C) to assess intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) morphology in a set of neurocritical patients, correlating the data with ICPW obtained from invasive catheter monitoring. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring were consecutively evaluated using the B4C sensor. Ultrasound-guided manual internal jugular vein (IJV) compression was performed to elevate ICP from the baseline. ICP values, amplitudes, and time intervals (P2/P1 ratio and time-to-peak [TTP]) between the ICP and B4C waveform peaks were analyzed. Results: Among 41 patients, the main causes for ICP monitoring included traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and stroke. Bland–Altman’s plot indicated agreement between the ICPW parameters obtained using both techniques. The strongest Pearson’s correlation for P2/P1 and TTP was observed among patients with no cranial damage (r = 0.72 and 0.85, respectively) to the detriment of those who have undergone craniotomies or craniectomies. P2/P1 values of 1 were equivalent between the two techniques (area under the receiver operator curve [AUROC], 0.9) whereas B4C cut-off 1.2 was predictive of intracranial hypertension (AUROC 0.9, p < 000.1 for ICP > 20 mmHg). Conclusion: B4C provided biometric amplitude ratios correlated with ICPW variation morphology and is useful for noninvasive critical care monitoring. MDPI 2021-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8707681/ /pubmed/34945774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121302 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Brasil, Sérgio Solla, Davi Jorge Fontoura Nogueira, Ricardo de Carvalho Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo Sá Paiva, Wellingson da Silva A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care |
title | A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care |
title_full | A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care |
title_fullStr | A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care |
title_short | A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care |
title_sort | novel noninvasive technique for intracranial pressure waveform monitoring in critical care |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brasilsergio anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT solladavijorgefontoura anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT nogueiraricardodecarvalho anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT teixeiramanoeljacobsen anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT malbouissonluizmarcelosa anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT paivawellingsondasilva anovelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT brasilsergio novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT solladavijorgefontoura novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT nogueiraricardodecarvalho novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT teixeiramanoeljacobsen novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT malbouissonluizmarcelosa novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare AT paivawellingsondasilva novelnoninvasivetechniqueforintracranialpressurewaveformmonitoringincriticalcare |