Cargando…

Anodal Capture for Multisite Pacing with a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead: A Feasibility Study

Background: Up to 40% of patients are CRT non-responders. Multisite pacing, using a unique quadripolar lead, also called multipoint/multipole pacing (MPP), is a potential alternative. We sought to determine the feasibility of intentional anodal capture using a single LV quadripolar lead, to reproduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bodin, Alexandre, Bisson, Arnaud, Andre, Clémentine, Babuty, Dominique, Clementy, Nicolas
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	MDPI 2021
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945180 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245886

Ejemplares similares

Left Purkinje premature ventricular complexes following left bundle branch area pacing
por: Lenormand, Thibault, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Intentional anodal capture of a left ventricular quadripolar lead enhances resynchronization equally with multipoint pacing
por: Morishima, Itsuro, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Localization of Left Ventricular Lead Electrodes in Relation to Myocardial Scar in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
por: Bisson, Arnaud, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of 1st and 2nd generation leadless pacemaker in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing for complete atrioventricular block
por: Clementy, N, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch area pacing and a dual-chamber ICD; a CROSS-LEFT substudy
por: Clementy, N, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Short-Term Availability of Viable Left Ventricular Pacing Sites with Quartet™ Quadripolar Leads
por: Gu, Min, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization
por: Leyva, Francisco, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Leadless or Conventional Transvenous Ventricular Permanent Pacemakers: A Nationwide Matched Control Study
por: Bodin, Alexandre, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Lead related complications in quadripolar versus bipolar left ventricular leads
por: Rijal, Shasank, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP)
por: Forleo, Giovanni B., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead: An Effective Alternative for Phrenic Nerve Stimulation
por: Nair, Krishnakumar
Publicado: (2013)

Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Ablation Using Mini-Electrode Recordings
por: Clementy, Nicolas, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Repetitive optimizing left ventricular pacing configurations with quadripolar leads improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A single-center randomized clinical trial
por: Gu, Min, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Benefits of an early management of palpitations
por: Clementy, Nicolas, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Galectin-3 in Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications
por: Clementy, Nicolas, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Novel lead anchor technique using an active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Inamura, Yukihiro, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Vector Selection of a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Pacing Lead Affects Acute Hemodynamic Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial
por: Asbach, Stefan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in a Patient with CRT-D Does Not Overcome Phrenic Nerve Stimulation
por: Parahuleva, Mariana S., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison among left ventricular bipolar, quadripolar and active fixation leads
por: Ziacchi, M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

An active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy with reduced postoperative complication rates
por: Robertson, Calum, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of anatomical reverse remodelling in the design of optimal quadripolar pacing leads: A computational study
por: Rodero, Cristobal, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Left bundle branch pacing with and without anodal capture: impact on ventricular activation pattern and acute haemodynamics
por: Ali, Nadine, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Defibrillation Conundrum: New Insights into the Mechanisms of Shock-Related Myocardial Injury Sustained from a Life-Saving Therapy
por: Clementy, Nicolas, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Special Populations with Atrial Fibrillation
por: Bisson, Arnaud, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Unexpected Resynchronization Effect of Anodal Capture
por: Chokesuwattanaskul, Ronpichai, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Quadripolar left ventricle only single lead pacing in a patient with a tricuspid mechanical valve: A less invasive approach
por: Grazina, André, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Performance and clinical comparison between left ventricular quadripolar and bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Observational research
por: Ziacchi, M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Successful ‘quadrangular' pacing in a non-responder patient to cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Clementy, Nicolas, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The Use of a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead Increases Successful Implantation Rates in Patients with Phrenic Nerve Stimulation and/or High Pacing Thresholds Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy with Conventional Bipolar Leads
por: Ohlow, Marc-Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture preserves physiological ventricular activation better than unipolar left bundle branch pacing
por: Curila, Karol, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Galectin-3 level predicts response to ablation and outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and systolic heart failure
por: Clementy, Nicolas, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Galectin-3 predicts response and outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Andre, Clémentine, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Left ventricular pacing vector selection by novel echo-particle imaging velocimetry analysis for optimization of quadripolar cardiac resynchronization device: a case report
por: Martiniello, Alfonso/A. Roberto/R., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Pacemaker Implantation After Balloon‐ or Self‐Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis
por: Bisson, Arnaud, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Incident Comorbidities, Aging and the Risk of Stroke in 608,108 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Analysis
por: Fauchier, Laurent, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Performance of an active fixation bipolar left ventricular lead vs passive fixation quadripolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy, a randomized trial
por: Keilegavlen, Havard, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The usefulness of balloon occlusive left ventricular lead delivery in combination with the quadripolar active fixation lead for a patient with complex coronary venous morphology
por: Sasaki, Shingo, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Shetty, Anoop K., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Therapy in a Large, Multicenter UK Registry
por: Behar, Jonathan M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Left ventricular resynchronization with left bundle branch area pacing: does the type of capture matter?
por: Curila, Karol, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_hpj2mcc0escbs1b9spb0a2flig