Cargando…
Comparison and Validation of Ichthyoplankton DNA Extraction Methods
Ichthyoplankton is the cluster of planktonic organisms that consists of fish eggs and larvae. These planktonic stages belong to the temporary zooplankton, representing future exploitable stocks. The study of the early ontogenesis of fish plays a key role in the understanding and evaluation of these...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps4040087 |
_version_ | 1784622592911474688 |
---|---|
author | Lamia, Diouri Théophile, Uwiringiyeyezu Hinde, Abdelouahab Mohamed, Malki Tarik, Baibai Abdelaziz, Soukri |
author_facet | Lamia, Diouri Théophile, Uwiringiyeyezu Hinde, Abdelouahab Mohamed, Malki Tarik, Baibai Abdelaziz, Soukri |
author_sort | Lamia, Diouri |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ichthyoplankton is the cluster of planktonic organisms that consists of fish eggs and larvae. These planktonic stages belong to the temporary zooplankton, representing future exploitable stocks. The study of the early ontogenesis of fish plays a key role in the understanding and evaluation of these populations through the study of their abundance and their spatio-temporal distribution. To better understand and protect these fisheries resources, it is essential to identify the different stages of fish embryonic development. This identification is usually performed using the classical method, based on morphological criteria under a binocular magnifying glass; however, this methodology is not always sufficient and is time consuming and, therefore, it is necessary to rely increasingly on molecular tools. The major problem with these tools is the yield and quality of the nucleic acids extracted from ichthyoplankton, especially in the case of eggs, which are small. Several methods have been used for DNA extraction from ichthyoplankton, either automated or manual, but very often from larvae or adults. In the present work, five fish egg DNA extraction protocols were compared based on their DNA yield and extraction quality, verified by agarose gel electrophoresis and quantitative PCR amplification. The results showed that extraction by our heat-protocol for direct PCR (Hp-dPCR) presents the simplest and cheapest protocol of all the kits used in this study, providing a sufficient quantity and quality of nucleic acids to be used for PCR amplification, and being within the reach of third world laboratories that often do not have sufficiently large budgets to obtain automated kits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8708074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87080742021-12-25 Comparison and Validation of Ichthyoplankton DNA Extraction Methods Lamia, Diouri Théophile, Uwiringiyeyezu Hinde, Abdelouahab Mohamed, Malki Tarik, Baibai Abdelaziz, Soukri Methods Protoc Article Ichthyoplankton is the cluster of planktonic organisms that consists of fish eggs and larvae. These planktonic stages belong to the temporary zooplankton, representing future exploitable stocks. The study of the early ontogenesis of fish plays a key role in the understanding and evaluation of these populations through the study of their abundance and their spatio-temporal distribution. To better understand and protect these fisheries resources, it is essential to identify the different stages of fish embryonic development. This identification is usually performed using the classical method, based on morphological criteria under a binocular magnifying glass; however, this methodology is not always sufficient and is time consuming and, therefore, it is necessary to rely increasingly on molecular tools. The major problem with these tools is the yield and quality of the nucleic acids extracted from ichthyoplankton, especially in the case of eggs, which are small. Several methods have been used for DNA extraction from ichthyoplankton, either automated or manual, but very often from larvae or adults. In the present work, five fish egg DNA extraction protocols were compared based on their DNA yield and extraction quality, verified by agarose gel electrophoresis and quantitative PCR amplification. The results showed that extraction by our heat-protocol for direct PCR (Hp-dPCR) presents the simplest and cheapest protocol of all the kits used in this study, providing a sufficient quantity and quality of nucleic acids to be used for PCR amplification, and being within the reach of third world laboratories that often do not have sufficiently large budgets to obtain automated kits. MDPI 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8708074/ /pubmed/34940398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps4040087 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lamia, Diouri Théophile, Uwiringiyeyezu Hinde, Abdelouahab Mohamed, Malki Tarik, Baibai Abdelaziz, Soukri Comparison and Validation of Ichthyoplankton DNA Extraction Methods |
title | Comparison and Validation of Ichthyoplankton DNA Extraction Methods |
title_full | Comparison and Validation of Ichthyoplankton DNA Extraction Methods |
title_fullStr | Comparison and Validation of Ichthyoplankton DNA Extraction Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison and Validation of Ichthyoplankton DNA Extraction Methods |
title_short | Comparison and Validation of Ichthyoplankton DNA Extraction Methods |
title_sort | comparison and validation of ichthyoplankton dna extraction methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps4040087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamiadiouri comparisonandvalidationofichthyoplanktondnaextractionmethods AT theophileuwiringiyeyezu comparisonandvalidationofichthyoplanktondnaextractionmethods AT hindeabdelouahab comparisonandvalidationofichthyoplanktondnaextractionmethods AT mohamedmalki comparisonandvalidationofichthyoplanktondnaextractionmethods AT tarikbaibai comparisonandvalidationofichthyoplanktondnaextractionmethods AT abdelazizsoukri comparisonandvalidationofichthyoplanktondnaextractionmethods |