Cargando…

Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria

The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López, Yuly, Muñoz, Laura, Gargallo-Viola, Domingo, Cantón, Rafael, Vila, Jordi, Zsolt, Ilonka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34948159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413363
_version_ 1784622604666011648
author López, Yuly
Muñoz, Laura
Gargallo-Viola, Domingo
Cantón, Rafael
Vila, Jordi
Zsolt, Ilonka
author_facet López, Yuly
Muñoz, Laura
Gargallo-Viola, Domingo
Cantón, Rafael
Vila, Jordi
Zsolt, Ilonka
author_sort López, Yuly
collection PubMed
description The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulation of ozenoxacin (OZN), moxifloxacin (MOX), levofloxacin (LVX), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) into the bacterial cells of 5 species, including Staphylococcus aureus (SA4-149), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SEP7602), Streptococcus pyogenes (SPY165), Streptococcus agalactiae (SAG146), and Enterococcus faecium (EF897) previously characterized.The concentration of quinolone uptake was estimated by agar disc-diffusion bioassay. Furthermore, we determined the inhibitory concentrations 50 (IC(50)) of OZN, MOX, LVX, and CIP against type II topoisomerases from S. aureus.The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The rapid penetration of OZN into the cell was reflected during the first minute of exposure with antibiotic values between 190 and 447 ng/mg (dry weight) of bacteria in all strains. Moreover, OZN showed the greatest inhibitory activity among the quinolones tested for both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV isolated from S. aureus with IC50 values of 10 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. OZN intracellular concentration was significantly higher than that of MOX, LVX and CIP. All of these features may explain the higher in vitro activity of OZN compared to the other tested quinolones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8708121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87081212021-12-25 Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria López, Yuly Muñoz, Laura Gargallo-Viola, Domingo Cantón, Rafael Vila, Jordi Zsolt, Ilonka Int J Mol Sci Article The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulation of ozenoxacin (OZN), moxifloxacin (MOX), levofloxacin (LVX), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) into the bacterial cells of 5 species, including Staphylococcus aureus (SA4-149), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SEP7602), Streptococcus pyogenes (SPY165), Streptococcus agalactiae (SAG146), and Enterococcus faecium (EF897) previously characterized.The concentration of quinolone uptake was estimated by agar disc-diffusion bioassay. Furthermore, we determined the inhibitory concentrations 50 (IC(50)) of OZN, MOX, LVX, and CIP against type II topoisomerases from S. aureus.The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The rapid penetration of OZN into the cell was reflected during the first minute of exposure with antibiotic values between 190 and 447 ng/mg (dry weight) of bacteria in all strains. Moreover, OZN showed the greatest inhibitory activity among the quinolones tested for both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV isolated from S. aureus with IC50 values of 10 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. OZN intracellular concentration was significantly higher than that of MOX, LVX and CIP. All of these features may explain the higher in vitro activity of OZN compared to the other tested quinolones. MDPI 2021-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8708121/ /pubmed/34948159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413363 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
López, Yuly
Muñoz, Laura
Gargallo-Viola, Domingo
Cantón, Rafael
Vila, Jordi
Zsolt, Ilonka
Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria
title Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria
title_full Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria
title_fullStr Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria
title_short Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria
title_sort uptake of ozenoxacin and other quinolones in gram-positive bacteria
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34948159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413363
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezyuly uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria
AT munozlaura uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria
AT gargallovioladomingo uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria
AT cantonrafael uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria
AT vilajordi uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria
AT zsoltilonka uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria