Cargando…
Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria
The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34948159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413363 |
_version_ | 1784622604666011648 |
---|---|
author | López, Yuly Muñoz, Laura Gargallo-Viola, Domingo Cantón, Rafael Vila, Jordi Zsolt, Ilonka |
author_facet | López, Yuly Muñoz, Laura Gargallo-Viola, Domingo Cantón, Rafael Vila, Jordi Zsolt, Ilonka |
author_sort | López, Yuly |
collection | PubMed |
description | The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulation of ozenoxacin (OZN), moxifloxacin (MOX), levofloxacin (LVX), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) into the bacterial cells of 5 species, including Staphylococcus aureus (SA4-149), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SEP7602), Streptococcus pyogenes (SPY165), Streptococcus agalactiae (SAG146), and Enterococcus faecium (EF897) previously characterized.The concentration of quinolone uptake was estimated by agar disc-diffusion bioassay. Furthermore, we determined the inhibitory concentrations 50 (IC(50)) of OZN, MOX, LVX, and CIP against type II topoisomerases from S. aureus.The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The rapid penetration of OZN into the cell was reflected during the first minute of exposure with antibiotic values between 190 and 447 ng/mg (dry weight) of bacteria in all strains. Moreover, OZN showed the greatest inhibitory activity among the quinolones tested for both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV isolated from S. aureus with IC50 values of 10 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. OZN intracellular concentration was significantly higher than that of MOX, LVX and CIP. All of these features may explain the higher in vitro activity of OZN compared to the other tested quinolones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8708121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87081212021-12-25 Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria López, Yuly Muñoz, Laura Gargallo-Viola, Domingo Cantón, Rafael Vila, Jordi Zsolt, Ilonka Int J Mol Sci Article The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulation of ozenoxacin (OZN), moxifloxacin (MOX), levofloxacin (LVX), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) into the bacterial cells of 5 species, including Staphylococcus aureus (SA4-149), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SEP7602), Streptococcus pyogenes (SPY165), Streptococcus agalactiae (SAG146), and Enterococcus faecium (EF897) previously characterized.The concentration of quinolone uptake was estimated by agar disc-diffusion bioassay. Furthermore, we determined the inhibitory concentrations 50 (IC(50)) of OZN, MOX, LVX, and CIP against type II topoisomerases from S. aureus.The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The rapid penetration of OZN into the cell was reflected during the first minute of exposure with antibiotic values between 190 and 447 ng/mg (dry weight) of bacteria in all strains. Moreover, OZN showed the greatest inhibitory activity among the quinolones tested for both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV isolated from S. aureus with IC50 values of 10 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. OZN intracellular concentration was significantly higher than that of MOX, LVX and CIP. All of these features may explain the higher in vitro activity of OZN compared to the other tested quinolones. MDPI 2021-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8708121/ /pubmed/34948159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413363 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article López, Yuly Muñoz, Laura Gargallo-Viola, Domingo Cantón, Rafael Vila, Jordi Zsolt, Ilonka Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria |
title | Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria |
title_full | Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria |
title_fullStr | Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria |
title_short | Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria |
title_sort | uptake of ozenoxacin and other quinolones in gram-positive bacteria |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34948159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezyuly uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria AT munozlaura uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria AT gargallovioladomingo uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria AT cantonrafael uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria AT vilajordi uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria AT zsoltilonka uptakeofozenoxacinandotherquinolonesingrampositivebacteria |