Cargando…

Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy

(1) Background: Recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) and multifocal pattern dystrophy simulating Stargardt disease (“pseudo-Stargardt pattern dystrophy”, PSPD) share phenotypic similitudes, leading to a difficult clinical diagnosis. Our aim was to assess whether a deep learning classifier pretrained...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miere, Alexandra, Zambrowski, Olivia, Kessler, Arthur, Mehanna, Carl-Joe, Pallone, Carlotta, Seknazi, Daniel, Denys, Paul, Amoroso, Francesca, Petit, Eric, Souied, Eric H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245742
_version_ 1784622674185551872
author Miere, Alexandra
Zambrowski, Olivia
Kessler, Arthur
Mehanna, Carl-Joe
Pallone, Carlotta
Seknazi, Daniel
Denys, Paul
Amoroso, Francesca
Petit, Eric
Souied, Eric H.
author_facet Miere, Alexandra
Zambrowski, Olivia
Kessler, Arthur
Mehanna, Carl-Joe
Pallone, Carlotta
Seknazi, Daniel
Denys, Paul
Amoroso, Francesca
Petit, Eric
Souied, Eric H.
author_sort Miere, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) and multifocal pattern dystrophy simulating Stargardt disease (“pseudo-Stargardt pattern dystrophy”, PSPD) share phenotypic similitudes, leading to a difficult clinical diagnosis. Our aim was to assess whether a deep learning classifier pretrained on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images can assist in distinguishing ABCA4-related STGD1 from the PRPH2/RDS-related PSPD and to compare the performance with that of retinal specialists. (2) Methods: We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) using 729 FAF images from normal patients or patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). Transfer learning was then used to update the weights of a ResNet50V2 used to classify the 370 FAF images into STGD1 and PSPD. Retina specialists evaluated the same dataset. The performance of the CNN and that of retina specialists were compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and precision. (3) Results: The CNN accuracy on the test dataset of 111 images was 0.882. The AUROC was 0.890, the precision was 0.883 and the sensitivity was 0.883. The accuracy for retina experts averaged 0.816, whereas for retina fellows it averaged 0.724. (4) Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that, even with small databases, a pretrained CNN is able to distinguish between STGD1 and PSPD with good accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8708395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87083952021-12-25 Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy Miere, Alexandra Zambrowski, Olivia Kessler, Arthur Mehanna, Carl-Joe Pallone, Carlotta Seknazi, Daniel Denys, Paul Amoroso, Francesca Petit, Eric Souied, Eric H. J Clin Med Article (1) Background: Recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) and multifocal pattern dystrophy simulating Stargardt disease (“pseudo-Stargardt pattern dystrophy”, PSPD) share phenotypic similitudes, leading to a difficult clinical diagnosis. Our aim was to assess whether a deep learning classifier pretrained on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images can assist in distinguishing ABCA4-related STGD1 from the PRPH2/RDS-related PSPD and to compare the performance with that of retinal specialists. (2) Methods: We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) using 729 FAF images from normal patients or patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). Transfer learning was then used to update the weights of a ResNet50V2 used to classify the 370 FAF images into STGD1 and PSPD. Retina specialists evaluated the same dataset. The performance of the CNN and that of retina specialists were compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and precision. (3) Results: The CNN accuracy on the test dataset of 111 images was 0.882. The AUROC was 0.890, the precision was 0.883 and the sensitivity was 0.883. The accuracy for retina experts averaged 0.816, whereas for retina fellows it averaged 0.724. (4) Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that, even with small databases, a pretrained CNN is able to distinguish between STGD1 and PSPD with good accuracy. MDPI 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8708395/ /pubmed/34945039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245742 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Miere, Alexandra
Zambrowski, Olivia
Kessler, Arthur
Mehanna, Carl-Joe
Pallone, Carlotta
Seknazi, Daniel
Denys, Paul
Amoroso, Francesca
Petit, Eric
Souied, Eric H.
Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy
title Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy
title_full Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy
title_fullStr Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy
title_short Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy
title_sort deep learning to distinguish abca4-related stargardt disease from prph2-related pseudo-stargardt pattern dystrophy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245742
work_keys_str_mv AT mierealexandra deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy
AT zambrowskiolivia deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy
AT kesslerarthur deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy
AT mehannacarljoe deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy
AT pallonecarlotta deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy
AT seknazidaniel deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy
AT denyspaul deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy
AT amorosofrancesca deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy
AT petiteric deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy
AT souiederich deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy