Cargando…
Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy
(1) Background: Recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) and multifocal pattern dystrophy simulating Stargardt disease (“pseudo-Stargardt pattern dystrophy”, PSPD) share phenotypic similitudes, leading to a difficult clinical diagnosis. Our aim was to assess whether a deep learning classifier pretrained...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245742 |
_version_ | 1784622674185551872 |
---|---|
author | Miere, Alexandra Zambrowski, Olivia Kessler, Arthur Mehanna, Carl-Joe Pallone, Carlotta Seknazi, Daniel Denys, Paul Amoroso, Francesca Petit, Eric Souied, Eric H. |
author_facet | Miere, Alexandra Zambrowski, Olivia Kessler, Arthur Mehanna, Carl-Joe Pallone, Carlotta Seknazi, Daniel Denys, Paul Amoroso, Francesca Petit, Eric Souied, Eric H. |
author_sort | Miere, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) and multifocal pattern dystrophy simulating Stargardt disease (“pseudo-Stargardt pattern dystrophy”, PSPD) share phenotypic similitudes, leading to a difficult clinical diagnosis. Our aim was to assess whether a deep learning classifier pretrained on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images can assist in distinguishing ABCA4-related STGD1 from the PRPH2/RDS-related PSPD and to compare the performance with that of retinal specialists. (2) Methods: We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) using 729 FAF images from normal patients or patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). Transfer learning was then used to update the weights of a ResNet50V2 used to classify the 370 FAF images into STGD1 and PSPD. Retina specialists evaluated the same dataset. The performance of the CNN and that of retina specialists were compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and precision. (3) Results: The CNN accuracy on the test dataset of 111 images was 0.882. The AUROC was 0.890, the precision was 0.883 and the sensitivity was 0.883. The accuracy for retina experts averaged 0.816, whereas for retina fellows it averaged 0.724. (4) Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that, even with small databases, a pretrained CNN is able to distinguish between STGD1 and PSPD with good accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8708395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87083952021-12-25 Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy Miere, Alexandra Zambrowski, Olivia Kessler, Arthur Mehanna, Carl-Joe Pallone, Carlotta Seknazi, Daniel Denys, Paul Amoroso, Francesca Petit, Eric Souied, Eric H. J Clin Med Article (1) Background: Recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) and multifocal pattern dystrophy simulating Stargardt disease (“pseudo-Stargardt pattern dystrophy”, PSPD) share phenotypic similitudes, leading to a difficult clinical diagnosis. Our aim was to assess whether a deep learning classifier pretrained on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images can assist in distinguishing ABCA4-related STGD1 from the PRPH2/RDS-related PSPD and to compare the performance with that of retinal specialists. (2) Methods: We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) using 729 FAF images from normal patients or patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). Transfer learning was then used to update the weights of a ResNet50V2 used to classify the 370 FAF images into STGD1 and PSPD. Retina specialists evaluated the same dataset. The performance of the CNN and that of retina specialists were compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and precision. (3) Results: The CNN accuracy on the test dataset of 111 images was 0.882. The AUROC was 0.890, the precision was 0.883 and the sensitivity was 0.883. The accuracy for retina experts averaged 0.816, whereas for retina fellows it averaged 0.724. (4) Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that, even with small databases, a pretrained CNN is able to distinguish between STGD1 and PSPD with good accuracy. MDPI 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8708395/ /pubmed/34945039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245742 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Miere, Alexandra Zambrowski, Olivia Kessler, Arthur Mehanna, Carl-Joe Pallone, Carlotta Seknazi, Daniel Denys, Paul Amoroso, Francesca Petit, Eric Souied, Eric H. Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy |
title | Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy |
title_full | Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy |
title_fullStr | Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy |
title_short | Deep Learning to Distinguish ABCA4-Related Stargardt Disease from PRPH2-Related Pseudo-Stargardt Pattern Dystrophy |
title_sort | deep learning to distinguish abca4-related stargardt disease from prph2-related pseudo-stargardt pattern dystrophy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mierealexandra deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy AT zambrowskiolivia deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy AT kesslerarthur deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy AT mehannacarljoe deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy AT pallonecarlotta deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy AT seknazidaniel deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy AT denyspaul deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy AT amorosofrancesca deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy AT petiteric deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy AT souiederich deeplearningtodistinguishabca4relatedstargardtdiseasefromprph2relatedpseudostargardtpatterndystrophy |