Cargando…

Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature

Background and objectives: The skin recently became the main focus of regenerative medicine and, in this context, skin substitutes are fully entering into the plastic surgeon’s armamentarium. Among the various types of skin substitutes, dermal substitutes (DSs) are the most used. Our study aims to r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cottone, Giuseppe, Amendola, Francesco, Strada, Carlo, Bagnato, Maria Chiara, Brambilla, Roberto, De Francesco, Francesco, Vaienti, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121367
_version_ 1784622710756737024
author Cottone, Giuseppe
Amendola, Francesco
Strada, Carlo
Bagnato, Maria Chiara
Brambilla, Roberto
De Francesco, Francesco
Vaienti, Luca
author_facet Cottone, Giuseppe
Amendola, Francesco
Strada, Carlo
Bagnato, Maria Chiara
Brambilla, Roberto
De Francesco, Francesco
Vaienti, Luca
author_sort Cottone, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description Background and objectives: The skin recently became the main focus of regenerative medicine and, in this context, skin substitutes are fully entering into the plastic surgeon’s armamentarium. Among the various types of skin substitutes, dermal substitutes (DSs) are the most used. Our study aims to retrospectively compare three renowned and extremely similar DS in the management of critical lower limb wounds in the largest cohort analysis currently present in literature. Materials and Methods: We followed a strict protocol of application and evaluation of the DS for each patient and wound and, after a meticulous bias reduction process, we compared final outcomes in terms of efficacy and speed in achieving the defect coverage. Results: Among patients who did not receive a skin graft after the DS, we registered a wound healed surface of 50% for Pelnac, 52% for Integra, and 19% for Nevelia, after 30 days from the external silicon layer removal; among those who received a skin graft after the DS, we observed a significantly lower mean percentage of graft take after 7 days with Pelnac (53%) compared to Integra and Nevelia (92% and 80%, respectively). The overall percentage of wound healed surface obtained after 30 days from the external silicon sheet removal, either with or without skin graft, was 71% for Pelnac, 63% for Integra and 63% for Nevelia. We also ran a sub-group analysis only including grafted wounds with a negative microbiological test and the mean percentage of graft take was similar this time. Eventually, we assessed the influence of the wound’s “chronicity” on its healing, comparing the mean graft take only in “acute” wounds who received a skin graft and it resulted 63% for Pelnac, 91% for Integra and 75% for Nevelia. Conclusions: Integra demonstrates the highest rate of skin graft viability and the highest rate of skin graft takes after 7 days. Pelnac shows the quickest induction of secondary healing in acute wounds. Nevelia is not different from Integra and shows a superior graft take compared to Pelnac, but features the lowest secondary healing induction rate. No differences exist between the three DSs in terms of wound healing after 30 days from the skin graft or from the removal of the external silicon layer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8708540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87085402021-12-25 Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature Cottone, Giuseppe Amendola, Francesco Strada, Carlo Bagnato, Maria Chiara Brambilla, Roberto De Francesco, Francesco Vaienti, Luca Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and objectives: The skin recently became the main focus of regenerative medicine and, in this context, skin substitutes are fully entering into the plastic surgeon’s armamentarium. Among the various types of skin substitutes, dermal substitutes (DSs) are the most used. Our study aims to retrospectively compare three renowned and extremely similar DS in the management of critical lower limb wounds in the largest cohort analysis currently present in literature. Materials and Methods: We followed a strict protocol of application and evaluation of the DS for each patient and wound and, after a meticulous bias reduction process, we compared final outcomes in terms of efficacy and speed in achieving the defect coverage. Results: Among patients who did not receive a skin graft after the DS, we registered a wound healed surface of 50% for Pelnac, 52% for Integra, and 19% for Nevelia, after 30 days from the external silicon layer removal; among those who received a skin graft after the DS, we observed a significantly lower mean percentage of graft take after 7 days with Pelnac (53%) compared to Integra and Nevelia (92% and 80%, respectively). The overall percentage of wound healed surface obtained after 30 days from the external silicon sheet removal, either with or without skin graft, was 71% for Pelnac, 63% for Integra and 63% for Nevelia. We also ran a sub-group analysis only including grafted wounds with a negative microbiological test and the mean percentage of graft take was similar this time. Eventually, we assessed the influence of the wound’s “chronicity” on its healing, comparing the mean graft take only in “acute” wounds who received a skin graft and it resulted 63% for Pelnac, 91% for Integra and 75% for Nevelia. Conclusions: Integra demonstrates the highest rate of skin graft viability and the highest rate of skin graft takes after 7 days. Pelnac shows the quickest induction of secondary healing in acute wounds. Nevelia is not different from Integra and shows a superior graft take compared to Pelnac, but features the lowest secondary healing induction rate. No differences exist between the three DSs in terms of wound healing after 30 days from the skin graft or from the removal of the external silicon layer. MDPI 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8708540/ /pubmed/34946312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121367 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cottone, Giuseppe
Amendola, Francesco
Strada, Carlo
Bagnato, Maria Chiara
Brambilla, Roberto
De Francesco, Francesco
Vaienti, Luca
Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature
title Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature
title_full Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature
title_fullStr Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature
title_short Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature
title_sort comparison of efficacy among three dermal substitutes in the management of critical lower-limb wounds: the largest biases-reduced single-center retrospective cohort study in literature
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121367
work_keys_str_mv AT cottonegiuseppe comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature
AT amendolafrancesco comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature
AT stradacarlo comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature
AT bagnatomariachiara comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature
AT brambillaroberto comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature
AT defrancescofrancesco comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature
AT vaientiluca comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature