Cargando…
Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature
Background and objectives: The skin recently became the main focus of regenerative medicine and, in this context, skin substitutes are fully entering into the plastic surgeon’s armamentarium. Among the various types of skin substitutes, dermal substitutes (DSs) are the most used. Our study aims to r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121367 |
_version_ | 1784622710756737024 |
---|---|
author | Cottone, Giuseppe Amendola, Francesco Strada, Carlo Bagnato, Maria Chiara Brambilla, Roberto De Francesco, Francesco Vaienti, Luca |
author_facet | Cottone, Giuseppe Amendola, Francesco Strada, Carlo Bagnato, Maria Chiara Brambilla, Roberto De Francesco, Francesco Vaienti, Luca |
author_sort | Cottone, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and objectives: The skin recently became the main focus of regenerative medicine and, in this context, skin substitutes are fully entering into the plastic surgeon’s armamentarium. Among the various types of skin substitutes, dermal substitutes (DSs) are the most used. Our study aims to retrospectively compare three renowned and extremely similar DS in the management of critical lower limb wounds in the largest cohort analysis currently present in literature. Materials and Methods: We followed a strict protocol of application and evaluation of the DS for each patient and wound and, after a meticulous bias reduction process, we compared final outcomes in terms of efficacy and speed in achieving the defect coverage. Results: Among patients who did not receive a skin graft after the DS, we registered a wound healed surface of 50% for Pelnac, 52% for Integra, and 19% for Nevelia, after 30 days from the external silicon layer removal; among those who received a skin graft after the DS, we observed a significantly lower mean percentage of graft take after 7 days with Pelnac (53%) compared to Integra and Nevelia (92% and 80%, respectively). The overall percentage of wound healed surface obtained after 30 days from the external silicon sheet removal, either with or without skin graft, was 71% for Pelnac, 63% for Integra and 63% for Nevelia. We also ran a sub-group analysis only including grafted wounds with a negative microbiological test and the mean percentage of graft take was similar this time. Eventually, we assessed the influence of the wound’s “chronicity” on its healing, comparing the mean graft take only in “acute” wounds who received a skin graft and it resulted 63% for Pelnac, 91% for Integra and 75% for Nevelia. Conclusions: Integra demonstrates the highest rate of skin graft viability and the highest rate of skin graft takes after 7 days. Pelnac shows the quickest induction of secondary healing in acute wounds. Nevelia is not different from Integra and shows a superior graft take compared to Pelnac, but features the lowest secondary healing induction rate. No differences exist between the three DSs in terms of wound healing after 30 days from the skin graft or from the removal of the external silicon layer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8708540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87085402021-12-25 Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature Cottone, Giuseppe Amendola, Francesco Strada, Carlo Bagnato, Maria Chiara Brambilla, Roberto De Francesco, Francesco Vaienti, Luca Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and objectives: The skin recently became the main focus of regenerative medicine and, in this context, skin substitutes are fully entering into the plastic surgeon’s armamentarium. Among the various types of skin substitutes, dermal substitutes (DSs) are the most used. Our study aims to retrospectively compare three renowned and extremely similar DS in the management of critical lower limb wounds in the largest cohort analysis currently present in literature. Materials and Methods: We followed a strict protocol of application and evaluation of the DS for each patient and wound and, after a meticulous bias reduction process, we compared final outcomes in terms of efficacy and speed in achieving the defect coverage. Results: Among patients who did not receive a skin graft after the DS, we registered a wound healed surface of 50% for Pelnac, 52% for Integra, and 19% for Nevelia, after 30 days from the external silicon layer removal; among those who received a skin graft after the DS, we observed a significantly lower mean percentage of graft take after 7 days with Pelnac (53%) compared to Integra and Nevelia (92% and 80%, respectively). The overall percentage of wound healed surface obtained after 30 days from the external silicon sheet removal, either with or without skin graft, was 71% for Pelnac, 63% for Integra and 63% for Nevelia. We also ran a sub-group analysis only including grafted wounds with a negative microbiological test and the mean percentage of graft take was similar this time. Eventually, we assessed the influence of the wound’s “chronicity” on its healing, comparing the mean graft take only in “acute” wounds who received a skin graft and it resulted 63% for Pelnac, 91% for Integra and 75% for Nevelia. Conclusions: Integra demonstrates the highest rate of skin graft viability and the highest rate of skin graft takes after 7 days. Pelnac shows the quickest induction of secondary healing in acute wounds. Nevelia is not different from Integra and shows a superior graft take compared to Pelnac, but features the lowest secondary healing induction rate. No differences exist between the three DSs in terms of wound healing after 30 days from the skin graft or from the removal of the external silicon layer. MDPI 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8708540/ /pubmed/34946312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121367 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cottone, Giuseppe Amendola, Francesco Strada, Carlo Bagnato, Maria Chiara Brambilla, Roberto De Francesco, Francesco Vaienti, Luca Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature |
title | Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature |
title_full | Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature |
title_short | Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature |
title_sort | comparison of efficacy among three dermal substitutes in the management of critical lower-limb wounds: the largest biases-reduced single-center retrospective cohort study in literature |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121367 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cottonegiuseppe comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature AT amendolafrancesco comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature AT stradacarlo comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature AT bagnatomariachiara comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature AT brambillaroberto comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature AT defrancescofrancesco comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature AT vaientiluca comparisonofefficacyamongthreedermalsubstitutesinthemanagementofcriticallowerlimbwoundsthelargestbiasesreducedsinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudyinliterature |