Cargando…
Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section
Objective: To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic isthmocele repair on isthmocele-related symptoms and/or fertility-related problems. The residual myometrial thickness before and after subsequent cesarean section was also evaluated. Design: Retrospective, case series. Setting: Public university hosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945080 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245785 |
_version_ | 1784622730329456640 |
---|---|
author | Karampelas, Stavros Salem Wehbe, Georges de Landsheere, Laurent Badr, Dominique A. Tebache, Linda Nisolle, Michelle |
author_facet | Karampelas, Stavros Salem Wehbe, Georges de Landsheere, Laurent Badr, Dominique A. Tebache, Linda Nisolle, Michelle |
author_sort | Karampelas, Stavros |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic isthmocele repair on isthmocele-related symptoms and/or fertility-related problems. The residual myometrial thickness before and after subsequent cesarean section was also evaluated. Design: Retrospective, case series. Setting: Public university hospital. Population: Women with isthmocele (residual myometrium < 5 mm) complaining of abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain or secondary infertility not otherwise specified. Methods: Women’s complaints and the residual myometrium were assessed pre-operatively and at three to six months post-operatively. In patients who conceived after surgery, the latter was measured at least six months after delivery by cesarean section. Main Outcome Measures: Resolution of the main symptom three to six months after surgery and persistence of laparoscopic repair benefits after subsequent cesarean section were considered as primary outcome measures. Results: Overall, 31 women underwent laparoscopic isthmocele repair. The success rates of the surgery as improvement of abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain and secondary infertility were 71.4% (10 of 14), 83.3% (10 of 12) and 83.3% (10 of 12), respectively. Mean residual myometrial thickness increased significantly from 1.77 mm pre-operatively to 6.67 mm, three to six months post-operatively. Mean myometrial thickness in patients who underwent subsequent cesarean section (N = 7) was 4.49 mm. In this sub-group, there was no significant difference between the mean myometrial thickness measured after the laparoscopic isthmocele repair and that measured after the subsequent cesarean section. None of these patients reported recurrence of their symptoms after delivery. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the laparoscopic isthmocele excision and repair is an appropriate approach for the treatment of isthmocele-related symptoms when done by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. The benefit of this new surgical approach seems to persist even after a subsequent cesarean section. Further investigations and prospective studies are required to confirm this finding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8708618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87086182021-12-25 Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section Karampelas, Stavros Salem Wehbe, Georges de Landsheere, Laurent Badr, Dominique A. Tebache, Linda Nisolle, Michelle J Clin Med Article Objective: To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic isthmocele repair on isthmocele-related symptoms and/or fertility-related problems. The residual myometrial thickness before and after subsequent cesarean section was also evaluated. Design: Retrospective, case series. Setting: Public university hospital. Population: Women with isthmocele (residual myometrium < 5 mm) complaining of abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain or secondary infertility not otherwise specified. Methods: Women’s complaints and the residual myometrium were assessed pre-operatively and at three to six months post-operatively. In patients who conceived after surgery, the latter was measured at least six months after delivery by cesarean section. Main Outcome Measures: Resolution of the main symptom three to six months after surgery and persistence of laparoscopic repair benefits after subsequent cesarean section were considered as primary outcome measures. Results: Overall, 31 women underwent laparoscopic isthmocele repair. The success rates of the surgery as improvement of abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain and secondary infertility were 71.4% (10 of 14), 83.3% (10 of 12) and 83.3% (10 of 12), respectively. Mean residual myometrial thickness increased significantly from 1.77 mm pre-operatively to 6.67 mm, three to six months post-operatively. Mean myometrial thickness in patients who underwent subsequent cesarean section (N = 7) was 4.49 mm. In this sub-group, there was no significant difference between the mean myometrial thickness measured after the laparoscopic isthmocele repair and that measured after the subsequent cesarean section. None of these patients reported recurrence of their symptoms after delivery. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the laparoscopic isthmocele excision and repair is an appropriate approach for the treatment of isthmocele-related symptoms when done by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. The benefit of this new surgical approach seems to persist even after a subsequent cesarean section. Further investigations and prospective studies are required to confirm this finding. MDPI 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8708618/ /pubmed/34945080 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245785 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Karampelas, Stavros Salem Wehbe, Georges de Landsheere, Laurent Badr, Dominique A. Tebache, Linda Nisolle, Michelle Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section |
title | Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section |
title_full | Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section |
title_short | Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section |
title_sort | laparoscopic isthmocele repair: efficacy and benefits before and after subsequent cesarean section |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945080 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karampelasstavros laparoscopicisthmocelerepairefficacyandbenefitsbeforeandaftersubsequentcesareansection AT salemwehbegeorges laparoscopicisthmocelerepairefficacyandbenefitsbeforeandaftersubsequentcesareansection AT delandsheerelaurent laparoscopicisthmocelerepairefficacyandbenefitsbeforeandaftersubsequentcesareansection AT badrdominiquea laparoscopicisthmocelerepairefficacyandbenefitsbeforeandaftersubsequentcesareansection AT tebachelinda laparoscopicisthmocelerepairefficacyandbenefitsbeforeandaftersubsequentcesareansection AT nisollemichelle laparoscopicisthmocelerepairefficacyandbenefitsbeforeandaftersubsequentcesareansection |