Cargando…

Effect of Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Cut Quality of PP and PVC-U Materials Coated with Polyurethane and Acrylate Coatings

The article focuses on the machining of polymeric materials polypropylene (PP) and un-plasticized poly vinyl chloride (PVC-U) after surface treatment with polyurethane and acrylate coatings using waterjet technology. Two types of waterjet technologies, abrasive waterjet (AWJ) and waterjet without ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Miroslav, Kolář, Viktor, Šulc, Jan, Mishra, Rajesh Kumar, Hromasová, Monika, Behera, Bijoya Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247542
_version_ 1784622832312909824
author Müller, Miroslav
Kolář, Viktor
Šulc, Jan
Mishra, Rajesh Kumar
Hromasová, Monika
Behera, Bijoya Kumar
author_facet Müller, Miroslav
Kolář, Viktor
Šulc, Jan
Mishra, Rajesh Kumar
Hromasová, Monika
Behera, Bijoya Kumar
author_sort Müller, Miroslav
collection PubMed
description The article focuses on the machining of polymeric materials polypropylene (PP) and un-plasticized poly vinyl chloride (PVC-U) after surface treatment with polyurethane and acrylate coatings using waterjet technology. Two types of waterjet technologies, abrasive waterjet (AWJ) and waterjet without abrasive (WJ), were used. The kerf width and its taper angle, at the inlet and outlet of the waterjet from the workpiece, were evaluated. Significant differences between AWJ and WJ technology were found. WJ technology proved to be less effective due to the creation of a nonuniform cutting gap and significant burrs. AWJ technology was shown to be more efficient, i.e., more uniform cuts were achieved compared to WJ technology, especially at a cutting head traverse speed of 50 mm·min(−1). The most uniform kerf width or taper angle was achieved for PP + MOBIHEL (0.09°). The materials (PP and PVC-U) with the POLURAN coating had higher values of the taper angle of the cutting gap than the material with the MOBIHEL coating at all cutting head traverse speeds. The SEM results showed that the inappropriate cutting head traverse speed and the associated WJ technology resulted in significant destruction of the material to be cut on the underside of the cut. Delamination of the POLURAN and MOBIHEL coatings from the base material PP and PVC-U was not demonstrated by SEM analysis over the range of cutting head traverse speeds, i.e., 50 to 1000 mm·min(−1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8709026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87090262021-12-25 Effect of Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Cut Quality of PP and PVC-U Materials Coated with Polyurethane and Acrylate Coatings Müller, Miroslav Kolář, Viktor Šulc, Jan Mishra, Rajesh Kumar Hromasová, Monika Behera, Bijoya Kumar Materials (Basel) Article The article focuses on the machining of polymeric materials polypropylene (PP) and un-plasticized poly vinyl chloride (PVC-U) after surface treatment with polyurethane and acrylate coatings using waterjet technology. Two types of waterjet technologies, abrasive waterjet (AWJ) and waterjet without abrasive (WJ), were used. The kerf width and its taper angle, at the inlet and outlet of the waterjet from the workpiece, were evaluated. Significant differences between AWJ and WJ technology were found. WJ technology proved to be less effective due to the creation of a nonuniform cutting gap and significant burrs. AWJ technology was shown to be more efficient, i.e., more uniform cuts were achieved compared to WJ technology, especially at a cutting head traverse speed of 50 mm·min(−1). The most uniform kerf width or taper angle was achieved for PP + MOBIHEL (0.09°). The materials (PP and PVC-U) with the POLURAN coating had higher values of the taper angle of the cutting gap than the material with the MOBIHEL coating at all cutting head traverse speeds. The SEM results showed that the inappropriate cutting head traverse speed and the associated WJ technology resulted in significant destruction of the material to be cut on the underside of the cut. Delamination of the POLURAN and MOBIHEL coatings from the base material PP and PVC-U was not demonstrated by SEM analysis over the range of cutting head traverse speeds, i.e., 50 to 1000 mm·min(−1). MDPI 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8709026/ /pubmed/34947137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247542 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Müller, Miroslav
Kolář, Viktor
Šulc, Jan
Mishra, Rajesh Kumar
Hromasová, Monika
Behera, Bijoya Kumar
Effect of Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Cut Quality of PP and PVC-U Materials Coated with Polyurethane and Acrylate Coatings
title Effect of Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Cut Quality of PP and PVC-U Materials Coated with Polyurethane and Acrylate Coatings
title_full Effect of Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Cut Quality of PP and PVC-U Materials Coated with Polyurethane and Acrylate Coatings
title_fullStr Effect of Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Cut Quality of PP and PVC-U Materials Coated with Polyurethane and Acrylate Coatings
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Cut Quality of PP and PVC-U Materials Coated with Polyurethane and Acrylate Coatings
title_short Effect of Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Cut Quality of PP and PVC-U Materials Coated with Polyurethane and Acrylate Coatings
title_sort effect of waterjet machining parameters on the cut quality of pp and pvc-u materials coated with polyurethane and acrylate coatings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247542
work_keys_str_mv AT mullermiroslav effectofwaterjetmachiningparametersonthecutqualityofppandpvcumaterialscoatedwithpolyurethaneandacrylatecoatings
AT kolarviktor effectofwaterjetmachiningparametersonthecutqualityofppandpvcumaterialscoatedwithpolyurethaneandacrylatecoatings
AT sulcjan effectofwaterjetmachiningparametersonthecutqualityofppandpvcumaterialscoatedwithpolyurethaneandacrylatecoatings
AT mishrarajeshkumar effectofwaterjetmachiningparametersonthecutqualityofppandpvcumaterialscoatedwithpolyurethaneandacrylatecoatings
AT hromasovamonika effectofwaterjetmachiningparametersonthecutqualityofppandpvcumaterialscoatedwithpolyurethaneandacrylatecoatings
AT beherabijoyakumar effectofwaterjetmachiningparametersonthecutqualityofppandpvcumaterialscoatedwithpolyurethaneandacrylatecoatings