Cargando…
Quality Assessment of Investigational Medicinal Products in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: One Year of Activity at the Clinical Trials Office
One year after the spread of the pandemic, we analyzed the assessment results of the quality documentation submitted to the Clinical Trials Office of the Italian Medicines Agency as part of the request for authorization of clinical trials with a COVID-19 indication. In this article, we report the cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34959722 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14121321 |
_version_ | 1784622883126902784 |
---|---|
author | Dri, Diego Alejandro Praticò, Giulia Gaucci, Elisa Marianecci, Carlotta Gramaglia, Donatella |
author_facet | Dri, Diego Alejandro Praticò, Giulia Gaucci, Elisa Marianecci, Carlotta Gramaglia, Donatella |
author_sort | Dri, Diego Alejandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | One year after the spread of the pandemic, we analyzed the assessment results of the quality documentation submitted to the Clinical Trials Office of the Italian Medicines Agency as part of the request for authorization of clinical trials with a COVID-19 indication. In this article, we report the classification of the documentation type, an overview of the assessment results, and the related issues focusing on the most frequently detected ones. Relevant data regarding the Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs) tested in COVID-19 clinical trials and their quality profiles are provided in the perspective of increasing transparency and availability of information. Some criticalities that have been exacerbated by the management of clinical trials during the emergency period are highlighted. Results confirm that IMPs tested in authorized COVID-19 clinical trials are developed in agreement with the same legal requirements for quality, safety, and efficacy as for any other medicinal product in the European Union (EU). The same strong regulatory framework applies, and there is no lowering in the safety profile due to the pandemic; authorized IMPs meet the highest standards of quality. The regulatory network should capitalize on lessons learned from the emergency setting. Some take-home messages are provided that could support the regulatory framework to expand its boundaries by innovating and evolving even though remaining strong and effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8709226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87092262021-12-25 Quality Assessment of Investigational Medicinal Products in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: One Year of Activity at the Clinical Trials Office Dri, Diego Alejandro Praticò, Giulia Gaucci, Elisa Marianecci, Carlotta Gramaglia, Donatella Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Article One year after the spread of the pandemic, we analyzed the assessment results of the quality documentation submitted to the Clinical Trials Office of the Italian Medicines Agency as part of the request for authorization of clinical trials with a COVID-19 indication. In this article, we report the classification of the documentation type, an overview of the assessment results, and the related issues focusing on the most frequently detected ones. Relevant data regarding the Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs) tested in COVID-19 clinical trials and their quality profiles are provided in the perspective of increasing transparency and availability of information. Some criticalities that have been exacerbated by the management of clinical trials during the emergency period are highlighted. Results confirm that IMPs tested in authorized COVID-19 clinical trials are developed in agreement with the same legal requirements for quality, safety, and efficacy as for any other medicinal product in the European Union (EU). The same strong regulatory framework applies, and there is no lowering in the safety profile due to the pandemic; authorized IMPs meet the highest standards of quality. The regulatory network should capitalize on lessons learned from the emergency setting. Some take-home messages are provided that could support the regulatory framework to expand its boundaries by innovating and evolving even though remaining strong and effective. MDPI 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8709226/ /pubmed/34959722 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14121321 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dri, Diego Alejandro Praticò, Giulia Gaucci, Elisa Marianecci, Carlotta Gramaglia, Donatella Quality Assessment of Investigational Medicinal Products in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: One Year of Activity at the Clinical Trials Office |
title | Quality Assessment of Investigational Medicinal Products in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: One Year of Activity at the Clinical Trials Office |
title_full | Quality Assessment of Investigational Medicinal Products in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: One Year of Activity at the Clinical Trials Office |
title_fullStr | Quality Assessment of Investigational Medicinal Products in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: One Year of Activity at the Clinical Trials Office |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality Assessment of Investigational Medicinal Products in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: One Year of Activity at the Clinical Trials Office |
title_short | Quality Assessment of Investigational Medicinal Products in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: One Year of Activity at the Clinical Trials Office |
title_sort | quality assessment of investigational medicinal products in covid-19 clinical trials: one year of activity at the clinical trials office |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34959722 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14121321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dridiegoalejandro qualityassessmentofinvestigationalmedicinalproductsincovid19clinicaltrialsoneyearofactivityattheclinicaltrialsoffice AT praticogiulia qualityassessmentofinvestigationalmedicinalproductsincovid19clinicaltrialsoneyearofactivityattheclinicaltrialsoffice AT gauccielisa qualityassessmentofinvestigationalmedicinalproductsincovid19clinicaltrialsoneyearofactivityattheclinicaltrialsoffice AT marianeccicarlotta qualityassessmentofinvestigationalmedicinalproductsincovid19clinicaltrialsoneyearofactivityattheclinicaltrialsoffice AT gramagliadonatella qualityassessmentofinvestigationalmedicinalproductsincovid19clinicaltrialsoneyearofactivityattheclinicaltrialsoffice |