Cargando…

The Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Background: Laboratory tests of inflammatory mediators are routinely used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences of dynamics of inflammatory markers of the blood in patients with suspected acute appendicitis between complicated AA (CAA), no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaminskas, Ąžuolas Algimantas, Lukšaitė-Lukštė, Raminta, Jasiūnas, Eugenijus, Samuilis, Artūras, Augustinavičius, Vytautas, Kryžauskas, Marius, Strupas, Kęstutis, Poškus, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946329
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121384
_version_ 1784622945712209920
author Kaminskas, Ąžuolas Algimantas
Lukšaitė-Lukštė, Raminta
Jasiūnas, Eugenijus
Samuilis, Artūras
Augustinavičius, Vytautas
Kryžauskas, Marius
Strupas, Kęstutis
Poškus, Tomas
author_facet Kaminskas, Ąžuolas Algimantas
Lukšaitė-Lukštė, Raminta
Jasiūnas, Eugenijus
Samuilis, Artūras
Augustinavičius, Vytautas
Kryžauskas, Marius
Strupas, Kęstutis
Poškus, Tomas
author_sort Kaminskas, Ąžuolas Algimantas
collection PubMed
description Background: Laboratory tests of inflammatory mediators are routinely used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences of dynamics of inflammatory markers of the blood in patients with suspected acute appendicitis between complicated AA (CAA), non-complicated AA (NAA), and when AA was excluded (No-AA). Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients presented to the Emergency Department (ER) of a tertiary hospital center during a three-year period. All patients suspected of acute appendicitis were prospectively registered from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. The dynamics of inflammatory markers of the blood between different types of AA (No-AA, NAA or CAA) during different periods of time are presented. Results: A total of 453 patients were included in the study, with 297 patients in the No-AA group, 99 in the NAA group, and 57 in the CAA group. White blood cell (WBC) count in the No-AA decreased with time, with a statistically significant difference between the <8 h and 25–72 h group. The neutrophils (NEU) percentage decreased in the No-AA group and was statistically significantly different between the <8 h and 25–72 h and <8 h and >72 h groups. C-reactive protein (CRP) increased significantly in the No-AA group throughout all time intervals, and from the first 24 h to the 25–72 h in the NAA and CAA groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the WBC count between No-AA, NAA, and No-AA and CAA groups during the first 24 and 24–48 h. There was a statistically significant difference between NEU percentage and LYMP percentage and in the NEU/LYMP ratio between No-AA and CAA groups through all time periods. CRP was significantly higher in the first 24 h in the CAA than in the No-AA group, and in the 24–48 h in the CAA group than in the No-AA and NAA groups. The linear logistic regression model, involving inflammatory mediators and clinical characteristics, showed mediocre diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing AA with an AUC of 0.737 (0.671–0.802). Conclusions: Increasing concentrations of inflammatory markers are more characteristic in CAA patients than in No-AA during the first 48 h after onset of the disease. A combination of laboratory tests with clinical signs and symptoms has a mediocre diagnostic accuracy in suspecting AA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8709480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87094802021-12-25 The Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis Kaminskas, Ąžuolas Algimantas Lukšaitė-Lukštė, Raminta Jasiūnas, Eugenijus Samuilis, Artūras Augustinavičius, Vytautas Kryžauskas, Marius Strupas, Kęstutis Poškus, Tomas Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background: Laboratory tests of inflammatory mediators are routinely used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences of dynamics of inflammatory markers of the blood in patients with suspected acute appendicitis between complicated AA (CAA), non-complicated AA (NAA), and when AA was excluded (No-AA). Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients presented to the Emergency Department (ER) of a tertiary hospital center during a three-year period. All patients suspected of acute appendicitis were prospectively registered from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. The dynamics of inflammatory markers of the blood between different types of AA (No-AA, NAA or CAA) during different periods of time are presented. Results: A total of 453 patients were included in the study, with 297 patients in the No-AA group, 99 in the NAA group, and 57 in the CAA group. White blood cell (WBC) count in the No-AA decreased with time, with a statistically significant difference between the <8 h and 25–72 h group. The neutrophils (NEU) percentage decreased in the No-AA group and was statistically significantly different between the <8 h and 25–72 h and <8 h and >72 h groups. C-reactive protein (CRP) increased significantly in the No-AA group throughout all time intervals, and from the first 24 h to the 25–72 h in the NAA and CAA groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the WBC count between No-AA, NAA, and No-AA and CAA groups during the first 24 and 24–48 h. There was a statistically significant difference between NEU percentage and LYMP percentage and in the NEU/LYMP ratio between No-AA and CAA groups through all time periods. CRP was significantly higher in the first 24 h in the CAA than in the No-AA group, and in the 24–48 h in the CAA group than in the No-AA and NAA groups. The linear logistic regression model, involving inflammatory mediators and clinical characteristics, showed mediocre diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing AA with an AUC of 0.737 (0.671–0.802). Conclusions: Increasing concentrations of inflammatory markers are more characteristic in CAA patients than in No-AA during the first 48 h after onset of the disease. A combination of laboratory tests with clinical signs and symptoms has a mediocre diagnostic accuracy in suspecting AA. MDPI 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8709480/ /pubmed/34946329 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121384 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kaminskas, Ąžuolas Algimantas
Lukšaitė-Lukštė, Raminta
Jasiūnas, Eugenijus
Samuilis, Artūras
Augustinavičius, Vytautas
Kryžauskas, Marius
Strupas, Kęstutis
Poškus, Tomas
The Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis
title The Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis
title_full The Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis
title_fullStr The Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed The Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis
title_short The Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis
title_sort dynamics of inflammatory markers in patients with suspected acute appendicitis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946329
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121384
work_keys_str_mv AT kaminskasazuolasalgimantas thedynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT luksaiteluksteraminta thedynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT jasiunaseugenijus thedynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT samuilisarturas thedynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT augustinaviciusvytautas thedynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT kryzauskasmarius thedynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT strupaskestutis thedynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT poskustomas thedynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT kaminskasazuolasalgimantas dynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT luksaiteluksteraminta dynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT jasiunaseugenijus dynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT samuilisarturas dynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT augustinaviciusvytautas dynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT kryzauskasmarius dynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT strupaskestutis dynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis
AT poskustomas dynamicsofinflammatorymarkersinpatientswithsuspectedacuteappendicitis