Cargando…

Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19

BACKGROUND: Testing individuals suspected of severe acute respiratory syndrome–like coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is essential to reduce the spread of disease. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the false negativity rate of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test when utilized f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gresh, Jared, Kisner, Harold, DuChateau, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00113-7
_version_ 1784622959834431488
author Gresh, Jared
Kisner, Harold
DuChateau, Brian
author_facet Gresh, Jared
Kisner, Harold
DuChateau, Brian
author_sort Gresh, Jared
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Testing individuals suspected of severe acute respiratory syndrome–like coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is essential to reduce the spread of disease. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the false negativity rate of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test when utilized for testing individuals suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Concurrent swab samples were collected from patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection by their healthcare provider within two different urgent care centers located in Easton, MA, USA and East Bridgewater, MA, USA. One swab was tested using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test. Negative results in patients considered at moderate to high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection were confirmed at a regional reference laboratory by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the additional swab sample. The data included in this study was collected retrospectively as an analysis of routine clinical practice. RESULTS: From October 19, 2020 to January 3, 2021, a total of 2241 tests were performed using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test, with 549 (24.5%) testing positive and 1692 (75.5%) testing negative. A subset (800) of the samples rendering a negative LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test was also tested using a PCR-based test for SARS-CoV-2. Of this subset, 770 (96.3%) tested negative, and 30 (3.8%) tested positive. Negative results obtained with the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test demonstrated 96.3% agreement with PCR-based tests (CI 95%, 94.7–97.4%). A cycle threshold (C(T)) was available for 17 of the 30 specimens that yielded discordant results, with an average C(T) value of 31.2, an SD of 3.0, and a range of 25.2–36.3. C(T) was > 30.0 in 11/17 specimens (64.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test had a low false-negative rate of 3.8% when used in a community-based setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8709539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87095392021-12-27 Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 Gresh, Jared Kisner, Harold DuChateau, Brian Diagn Progn Res Research BACKGROUND: Testing individuals suspected of severe acute respiratory syndrome–like coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is essential to reduce the spread of disease. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the false negativity rate of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test when utilized for testing individuals suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Concurrent swab samples were collected from patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection by their healthcare provider within two different urgent care centers located in Easton, MA, USA and East Bridgewater, MA, USA. One swab was tested using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test. Negative results in patients considered at moderate to high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection were confirmed at a regional reference laboratory by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the additional swab sample. The data included in this study was collected retrospectively as an analysis of routine clinical practice. RESULTS: From October 19, 2020 to January 3, 2021, a total of 2241 tests were performed using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test, with 549 (24.5%) testing positive and 1692 (75.5%) testing negative. A subset (800) of the samples rendering a negative LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test was also tested using a PCR-based test for SARS-CoV-2. Of this subset, 770 (96.3%) tested negative, and 30 (3.8%) tested positive. Negative results obtained with the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test demonstrated 96.3% agreement with PCR-based tests (CI 95%, 94.7–97.4%). A cycle threshold (C(T)) was available for 17 of the 30 specimens that yielded discordant results, with an average C(T) value of 31.2, an SD of 3.0, and a range of 25.2–36.3. C(T) was > 30.0 in 11/17 specimens (64.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test had a low false-negative rate of 3.8% when used in a community-based setting. BioMed Central 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8709539/ /pubmed/34952653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00113-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Gresh, Jared
Kisner, Harold
DuChateau, Brian
Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19
title Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19
title_full Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19
title_fullStr Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19
title_short Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19
title_sort urgent care study of the lumiradx sars-cov-2 ag test for rapid diagnosis of covid-19
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00113-7
work_keys_str_mv AT greshjared urgentcarestudyofthelumiradxsarscov2agtestforrapiddiagnosisofcovid19
AT kisnerharold urgentcarestudyofthelumiradxsarscov2agtestforrapiddiagnosisofcovid19
AT duchateaubrian urgentcarestudyofthelumiradxsarscov2agtestforrapiddiagnosisofcovid19