Cargando…

Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy

PURPOSE: Since it is practically significant to explore how to repair the public’s trust in charities during accidental crisis, this study explored the crisis response strategies that charitable organizations with and without crisis histories could adopt when facing a current accidental crisis. PART...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Xuhui, Ren, Zirong, Liu, Zhengjie, Li, Weijian, Sun, Binghai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984036
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S341650
_version_ 1784622961344380928
author Yuan, Xuhui
Ren, Zirong
Liu, Zhengjie
Li, Weijian
Sun, Binghai
author_facet Yuan, Xuhui
Ren, Zirong
Liu, Zhengjie
Li, Weijian
Sun, Binghai
author_sort Yuan, Xuhui
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Since it is practically significant to explore how to repair the public’s trust in charities during accidental crisis, this study explored the crisis response strategies that charitable organizations with and without crisis histories could adopt when facing a current accidental crisis. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Study 1 (N = 177) used a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to examine the effects of crisis history (no crisis history vs. crisis history) and crisis response strategies (diminish vs. rebuild) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis. Study 2 adopting a 3 × 2 between-subjects design examined the effects of crisis history (victim crisis history vs. accidental crisis history vs. preventable crisis history) and crisis response strategies (diminish vs. rebuild) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis. RESULTS: The results of Study 1 showed that the diminish strategy adopted by charities in an accidental crisis can enhance public trust. However, if the charity has a crisis history, the rebuild strategy will enhance public trust. The results of Study 2 showed that, under the victim crisis history condition, participants’ charity trust was borderline significantly higher than their pre-test charity trust when the diminish strategy was used. However, rebuild strategies did not significantly increase trust. Under the accidental crisis history condition, diminish strategies improved trust after the accidental crisis, while rebuild strategies did not. Under the preventable crisis history condition, diminish strategies did not improve trust after an accidental crisis, while rebuild strategies did. CONCLUSION: Charities should adopt a diminish strategy when experiencing their first accidental crisis. Charities with a victim or accidental crisis history should adopt a diminish strategy when facing a current accidental crisis. However, if a charity has a preventable crisis history, rebuild strategies are the most appropriate response to a current accidental crisis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8709546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87095462022-01-03 Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy Yuan, Xuhui Ren, Zirong Liu, Zhengjie Li, Weijian Sun, Binghai Psychol Res Behav Manag Original Research PURPOSE: Since it is practically significant to explore how to repair the public’s trust in charities during accidental crisis, this study explored the crisis response strategies that charitable organizations with and without crisis histories could adopt when facing a current accidental crisis. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Study 1 (N = 177) used a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to examine the effects of crisis history (no crisis history vs. crisis history) and crisis response strategies (diminish vs. rebuild) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis. Study 2 adopting a 3 × 2 between-subjects design examined the effects of crisis history (victim crisis history vs. accidental crisis history vs. preventable crisis history) and crisis response strategies (diminish vs. rebuild) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis. RESULTS: The results of Study 1 showed that the diminish strategy adopted by charities in an accidental crisis can enhance public trust. However, if the charity has a crisis history, the rebuild strategy will enhance public trust. The results of Study 2 showed that, under the victim crisis history condition, participants’ charity trust was borderline significantly higher than their pre-test charity trust when the diminish strategy was used. However, rebuild strategies did not significantly increase trust. Under the accidental crisis history condition, diminish strategies improved trust after the accidental crisis, while rebuild strategies did not. Under the preventable crisis history condition, diminish strategies did not improve trust after an accidental crisis, while rebuild strategies did. CONCLUSION: Charities should adopt a diminish strategy when experiencing their first accidental crisis. Charities with a victim or accidental crisis history should adopt a diminish strategy when facing a current accidental crisis. However, if a charity has a preventable crisis history, rebuild strategies are the most appropriate response to a current accidental crisis. Dove 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8709546/ /pubmed/34984036 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S341650 Text en © 2021 Yuan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yuan, Xuhui
Ren, Zirong
Liu, Zhengjie
Li, Weijian
Sun, Binghai
Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy
title Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy
title_full Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy
title_fullStr Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy
title_short Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy
title_sort repairing charity trust in times of accidental crisis: the role of crisis history and crisis response strategy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984036
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S341650
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanxuhui repairingcharitytrustintimesofaccidentalcrisistheroleofcrisishistoryandcrisisresponsestrategy
AT renzirong repairingcharitytrustintimesofaccidentalcrisistheroleofcrisishistoryandcrisisresponsestrategy
AT liuzhengjie repairingcharitytrustintimesofaccidentalcrisistheroleofcrisishistoryandcrisisresponsestrategy
AT liweijian repairingcharitytrustintimesofaccidentalcrisistheroleofcrisishistoryandcrisisresponsestrategy
AT sunbinghai repairingcharitytrustintimesofaccidentalcrisistheroleofcrisishistoryandcrisisresponsestrategy