Cargando…

Implementing community-based human papillomavirus self-sampling with SMS text follow-up for cervical cancer screening in rural, southwestern Uganda

BACKGROUND: Self-collected HPV screening may improve cervical cancer screening coverage in low resource countries, yet data guiding implementation and follow-up of abnormal results are sparse. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort implementation study of HPV self-testing program in Mbarara, Uganda w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph, Naima T, Namuli, Alexcer, Kakuhikire, Bernard, Baguma, Charles, Juliet, Mercy, Ayebare, Patience, Ahereza, Phionah, Tsai, Alexander C, Siedner, Mark J, Randall, Thomas R, Ngonzi, Joseph, Boatin, Adeline A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society of Global Health 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003710
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04036
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Self-collected HPV screening may improve cervical cancer screening coverage in low resource countries, yet data guiding implementation and follow-up of abnormal results are sparse. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort implementation study of HPV self-testing program in Mbarara, Uganda with mobile phones to facilitate result notification and referral for treatment at a regional hospital. The effectiveness of the interventions was analyzed using Proctor’s model of implementation. Women were interviewed following screening and at 6 months to assess acceptability and barriers to follow-up. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: 159 of 194 (82%) of eligible women underwent HPV self-sampling; of these, 27 (17%) returned positive for high-risk HPV subtypes. We sent SMS messages providing test results and follow-up instructions to all participants. Seventeen (63%) hrHPV-positive participants reported receiving SMS text instructions for follow-up, of whom 6 (35%) presented for follow-up. The most common reasons for not returning were: lack of transportation (n = 11), disbelief of results (n = 5), lack of childcare (n = 4), and lack of symptoms (n = 3). Confidence in test results was higher for self-screening compared to VIA (Likert score 4.8 vs 4.4, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of SMS text-based referrals, only one-third of women presented for clinical follow-up after abnormal HPV testing.