Cargando…

Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

BACKGROUND: In recent years, robotic rehabilitation devices have often been used for motor training. However, to date, no systematic reviews of qualitative studies exploring the end-user experiences of robotic devices in motor rehabilitation have been published. The aim of this study was to review e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laparidou, Despina, Curtis, Ffion, Akanuwe, Joseph, Goher, Khaled, Niroshan Siriwardena, A., Kucukyilmaz, Ayse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8710022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3
_version_ 1784623070779015168
author Laparidou, Despina
Curtis, Ffion
Akanuwe, Joseph
Goher, Khaled
Niroshan Siriwardena, A.
Kucukyilmaz, Ayse
author_facet Laparidou, Despina
Curtis, Ffion
Akanuwe, Joseph
Goher, Khaled
Niroshan Siriwardena, A.
Kucukyilmaz, Ayse
author_sort Laparidou, Despina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, robotic rehabilitation devices have often been used for motor training. However, to date, no systematic reviews of qualitative studies exploring the end-user experiences of robotic devices in motor rehabilitation have been published. The aim of this study was to review end-users’ (patients, carers and healthcare professionals) experiences with robotic devices in motor rehabilitation, by conducting a systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies concerning the users’ experiences with such robotic devices. METHODS: Qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with a qualitative element were eligible for inclusion. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2020, supplemented with internet searches and forward and backward citation tracking from the included studies and review articles. Data were synthesised thematically following the Thomas and Harden approach. The CASP Qualitative Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies of this review. RESULTS: The search strategy identified a total of 13,556 citations and after removing duplicates and excluding citations based on title and abstract, and full text screening, 30 studies were included. All studies were considered of acceptable quality. We developed six analytical themes: logistic barriers; technological challenges; appeal and engagement; supportive interactions and relationships; benefits for physical, psychological, and social function(ing); and expanding and sustaining therapeutic options. CONCLUSIONS: Despite experiencing technological and logistic challenges, participants found robotic devices acceptable, useful and beneficial (physically, psychologically, and socially), as well as fun and interesting. Having supportive relationships with significant others and positive therapeutic relationships with healthcare staff were considered the foundation for successful rehabilitation and recovery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8710022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87100222022-01-05 Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis Laparidou, Despina Curtis, Ffion Akanuwe, Joseph Goher, Khaled Niroshan Siriwardena, A. Kucukyilmaz, Ayse J Neuroeng Rehabil Review BACKGROUND: In recent years, robotic rehabilitation devices have often been used for motor training. However, to date, no systematic reviews of qualitative studies exploring the end-user experiences of robotic devices in motor rehabilitation have been published. The aim of this study was to review end-users’ (patients, carers and healthcare professionals) experiences with robotic devices in motor rehabilitation, by conducting a systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies concerning the users’ experiences with such robotic devices. METHODS: Qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with a qualitative element were eligible for inclusion. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2020, supplemented with internet searches and forward and backward citation tracking from the included studies and review articles. Data were synthesised thematically following the Thomas and Harden approach. The CASP Qualitative Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies of this review. RESULTS: The search strategy identified a total of 13,556 citations and after removing duplicates and excluding citations based on title and abstract, and full text screening, 30 studies were included. All studies were considered of acceptable quality. We developed six analytical themes: logistic barriers; technological challenges; appeal and engagement; supportive interactions and relationships; benefits for physical, psychological, and social function(ing); and expanding and sustaining therapeutic options. CONCLUSIONS: Despite experiencing technological and logistic challenges, participants found robotic devices acceptable, useful and beneficial (physically, psychologically, and socially), as well as fun and interesting. Having supportive relationships with significant others and positive therapeutic relationships with healthcare staff were considered the foundation for successful rehabilitation and recovery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3. BioMed Central 2021-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8710022/ /pubmed/34953497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Laparidou, Despina
Curtis, Ffion
Akanuwe, Joseph
Goher, Khaled
Niroshan Siriwardena, A.
Kucukyilmaz, Ayse
Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_full Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_fullStr Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_short Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_sort patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8710022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3
work_keys_str_mv AT laparidoudespina patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT curtisffion patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT akanuwejoseph patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT goherkhaled patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT niroshansiriwardenaa patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT kucukyilmazayse patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis