Cargando…
Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
BACKGROUND: In recent years, robotic rehabilitation devices have often been used for motor training. However, to date, no systematic reviews of qualitative studies exploring the end-user experiences of robotic devices in motor rehabilitation have been published. The aim of this study was to review e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8710022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3 |
_version_ | 1784623070779015168 |
---|---|
author | Laparidou, Despina Curtis, Ffion Akanuwe, Joseph Goher, Khaled Niroshan Siriwardena, A. Kucukyilmaz, Ayse |
author_facet | Laparidou, Despina Curtis, Ffion Akanuwe, Joseph Goher, Khaled Niroshan Siriwardena, A. Kucukyilmaz, Ayse |
author_sort | Laparidou, Despina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In recent years, robotic rehabilitation devices have often been used for motor training. However, to date, no systematic reviews of qualitative studies exploring the end-user experiences of robotic devices in motor rehabilitation have been published. The aim of this study was to review end-users’ (patients, carers and healthcare professionals) experiences with robotic devices in motor rehabilitation, by conducting a systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies concerning the users’ experiences with such robotic devices. METHODS: Qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with a qualitative element were eligible for inclusion. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2020, supplemented with internet searches and forward and backward citation tracking from the included studies and review articles. Data were synthesised thematically following the Thomas and Harden approach. The CASP Qualitative Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies of this review. RESULTS: The search strategy identified a total of 13,556 citations and after removing duplicates and excluding citations based on title and abstract, and full text screening, 30 studies were included. All studies were considered of acceptable quality. We developed six analytical themes: logistic barriers; technological challenges; appeal and engagement; supportive interactions and relationships; benefits for physical, psychological, and social function(ing); and expanding and sustaining therapeutic options. CONCLUSIONS: Despite experiencing technological and logistic challenges, participants found robotic devices acceptable, useful and beneficial (physically, psychologically, and socially), as well as fun and interesting. Having supportive relationships with significant others and positive therapeutic relationships with healthcare staff were considered the foundation for successful rehabilitation and recovery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8710022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87100222022-01-05 Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis Laparidou, Despina Curtis, Ffion Akanuwe, Joseph Goher, Khaled Niroshan Siriwardena, A. Kucukyilmaz, Ayse J Neuroeng Rehabil Review BACKGROUND: In recent years, robotic rehabilitation devices have often been used for motor training. However, to date, no systematic reviews of qualitative studies exploring the end-user experiences of robotic devices in motor rehabilitation have been published. The aim of this study was to review end-users’ (patients, carers and healthcare professionals) experiences with robotic devices in motor rehabilitation, by conducting a systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies concerning the users’ experiences with such robotic devices. METHODS: Qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with a qualitative element were eligible for inclusion. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2020, supplemented with internet searches and forward and backward citation tracking from the included studies and review articles. Data were synthesised thematically following the Thomas and Harden approach. The CASP Qualitative Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies of this review. RESULTS: The search strategy identified a total of 13,556 citations and after removing duplicates and excluding citations based on title and abstract, and full text screening, 30 studies were included. All studies were considered of acceptable quality. We developed six analytical themes: logistic barriers; technological challenges; appeal and engagement; supportive interactions and relationships; benefits for physical, psychological, and social function(ing); and expanding and sustaining therapeutic options. CONCLUSIONS: Despite experiencing technological and logistic challenges, participants found robotic devices acceptable, useful and beneficial (physically, psychologically, and socially), as well as fun and interesting. Having supportive relationships with significant others and positive therapeutic relationships with healthcare staff were considered the foundation for successful rehabilitation and recovery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3. BioMed Central 2021-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8710022/ /pubmed/34953497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Laparidou, Despina Curtis, Ffion Akanuwe, Joseph Goher, Khaled Niroshan Siriwardena, A. Kucukyilmaz, Ayse Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis |
title | Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis |
title_full | Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis |
title_fullStr | Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis |
title_short | Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis |
title_sort | patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8710022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laparidoudespina patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis AT curtisffion patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis AT akanuwejoseph patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis AT goherkhaled patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis AT niroshansiriwardenaa patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis AT kucukyilmazayse patientcarerandstaffperceptionsofroboticsinmotorrehabilitationasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis |