Cargando…

Anatomical Assessment vs. Pullback REsting full-cycle rAtio (RFR) Measurement for Evaluation of Focal and Diffuse CoronarY Disease: Rationale and Design of the “READY Register”

Background: The morphology and functional severity of coronary stenosis show poor correlation. However, in clinical practice, the visual assessment of the invasive coronary angiography is still the most common means for evaluating coronary disease. The fractional flow reserve (FFR), the coronary flo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kőszegi, Zsolt, Berta, Balázs, Tóth, Gábor G., Tar, Balázs, Üveges, Áron, Ágoston, András, Szücs, Attila, Szabó, Gábor Tamás, Barta, Judit, Szük, Tibor, Czuriga, Dániel, Komócsi, András, Ruzsa, Zoltán
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8710506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966799
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.784220
_version_ 1784623169627226112
author Kőszegi, Zsolt
Berta, Balázs
Tóth, Gábor G.
Tar, Balázs
Üveges, Áron
Ágoston, András
Szücs, Attila
Szabó, Gábor Tamás
Barta, Judit
Szük, Tibor
Czuriga, Dániel
Komócsi, András
Ruzsa, Zoltán
author_facet Kőszegi, Zsolt
Berta, Balázs
Tóth, Gábor G.
Tar, Balázs
Üveges, Áron
Ágoston, András
Szücs, Attila
Szabó, Gábor Tamás
Barta, Judit
Szük, Tibor
Czuriga, Dániel
Komócsi, András
Ruzsa, Zoltán
author_sort Kőszegi, Zsolt
collection PubMed
description Background: The morphology and functional severity of coronary stenosis show poor correlation. However, in clinical practice, the visual assessment of the invasive coronary angiography is still the most common means for evaluating coronary disease. The fractional flow reserve (FFR), the coronary flow reserve (CFR), and the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) are established indices to determine the hemodynamic significance of a coronary stenosis. Design/Methods: The READY register (NCT04857762) is a prospective, multicentre register of patients who underwent invasive intracoronary FFR and RFR measurement. The main aim of the registry is to compare the visual estimate of coronary lesions and the functional severity of the stenosis assessed by FFR, as well as the RFR pullback. Characterizations of the coronary vessel for predominantly focal, diffuse, or mixed type disease according to visual vs. RFR pullback determination will be compared. The secondary endpoint of the study is a composite of major adverse cardiac events, including death, myocardial infarction, and repeat coronary revascularization at 1 year. These endpoints will be compared in patients with non-ischemic FFR in the subgroup of cases where the local pressure drop indicates a focal lesion according to the definition of ΔRFR > 0.05 (for <25 mm segment length) and in the subgroup without significant ΔRFR. In case of an FFR value above 0.80, an extended physiological analysis is planned to diagnose or exclude microvascular disease using the CFR/FFR index. This includes novel flow dynamic modeling for CFR calculation (CFR(p−3D)). Conclusion: The READY register will define the effect of RFR measurement on visual estimation-based clinical decision-making. It can identify a prognostic value of ΔRFR during RFR pullback, and it would also explore the frequency of microvascular disease in the patient population with FFR > 0.80. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04857762).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8710506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87105062021-12-28 Anatomical Assessment vs. Pullback REsting full-cycle rAtio (RFR) Measurement for Evaluation of Focal and Diffuse CoronarY Disease: Rationale and Design of the “READY Register” Kőszegi, Zsolt Berta, Balázs Tóth, Gábor G. Tar, Balázs Üveges, Áron Ágoston, András Szücs, Attila Szabó, Gábor Tamás Barta, Judit Szük, Tibor Czuriga, Dániel Komócsi, András Ruzsa, Zoltán Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: The morphology and functional severity of coronary stenosis show poor correlation. However, in clinical practice, the visual assessment of the invasive coronary angiography is still the most common means for evaluating coronary disease. The fractional flow reserve (FFR), the coronary flow reserve (CFR), and the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) are established indices to determine the hemodynamic significance of a coronary stenosis. Design/Methods: The READY register (NCT04857762) is a prospective, multicentre register of patients who underwent invasive intracoronary FFR and RFR measurement. The main aim of the registry is to compare the visual estimate of coronary lesions and the functional severity of the stenosis assessed by FFR, as well as the RFR pullback. Characterizations of the coronary vessel for predominantly focal, diffuse, or mixed type disease according to visual vs. RFR pullback determination will be compared. The secondary endpoint of the study is a composite of major adverse cardiac events, including death, myocardial infarction, and repeat coronary revascularization at 1 year. These endpoints will be compared in patients with non-ischemic FFR in the subgroup of cases where the local pressure drop indicates a focal lesion according to the definition of ΔRFR > 0.05 (for <25 mm segment length) and in the subgroup without significant ΔRFR. In case of an FFR value above 0.80, an extended physiological analysis is planned to diagnose or exclude microvascular disease using the CFR/FFR index. This includes novel flow dynamic modeling for CFR calculation (CFR(p−3D)). Conclusion: The READY register will define the effect of RFR measurement on visual estimation-based clinical decision-making. It can identify a prognostic value of ΔRFR during RFR pullback, and it would also explore the frequency of microvascular disease in the patient population with FFR > 0.80. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04857762). Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8710506/ /pubmed/34966799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.784220 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kőszegi, Berta, Tóth, Tar, Üveges, Ágoston, Szücs, Szabó, Barta, Szük, Czuriga, Komócsi and Ruzsa. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Kőszegi, Zsolt
Berta, Balázs
Tóth, Gábor G.
Tar, Balázs
Üveges, Áron
Ágoston, András
Szücs, Attila
Szabó, Gábor Tamás
Barta, Judit
Szük, Tibor
Czuriga, Dániel
Komócsi, András
Ruzsa, Zoltán
Anatomical Assessment vs. Pullback REsting full-cycle rAtio (RFR) Measurement for Evaluation of Focal and Diffuse CoronarY Disease: Rationale and Design of the “READY Register”
title Anatomical Assessment vs. Pullback REsting full-cycle rAtio (RFR) Measurement for Evaluation of Focal and Diffuse CoronarY Disease: Rationale and Design of the “READY Register”
title_full Anatomical Assessment vs. Pullback REsting full-cycle rAtio (RFR) Measurement for Evaluation of Focal and Diffuse CoronarY Disease: Rationale and Design of the “READY Register”
title_fullStr Anatomical Assessment vs. Pullback REsting full-cycle rAtio (RFR) Measurement for Evaluation of Focal and Diffuse CoronarY Disease: Rationale and Design of the “READY Register”
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical Assessment vs. Pullback REsting full-cycle rAtio (RFR) Measurement for Evaluation of Focal and Diffuse CoronarY Disease: Rationale and Design of the “READY Register”
title_short Anatomical Assessment vs. Pullback REsting full-cycle rAtio (RFR) Measurement for Evaluation of Focal and Diffuse CoronarY Disease: Rationale and Design of the “READY Register”
title_sort anatomical assessment vs. pullback resting full-cycle ratio (rfr) measurement for evaluation of focal and diffuse coronary disease: rationale and design of the “ready register”
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8710506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966799
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.784220
work_keys_str_mv AT koszegizsolt anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT bertabalazs anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT tothgaborg anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT tarbalazs anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT uvegesaron anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT agostonandras anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT szucsattila anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT szabogabortamas anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT bartajudit anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT szuktibor anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT czurigadaniel anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT komocsiandras anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister
AT ruzsazoltan anatomicalassessmentvspullbackrestingfullcycleratiorfrmeasurementforevaluationoffocalanddiffusecoronarydiseaserationaleanddesignofthereadyregister