Cargando…
Improving equity in the distribution and financing of health services in Mauritius, a small island state with deeply rooted welfare state standards
BACKGROUND: Ensuring benefits of free healthcare services are accessible to those in need is essential to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). Mauritius has sustained a welfare state over four decades with free health services in all public facilities. However, paradoxically, the national UHC se...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8710888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006757 |
_version_ | 1784623261036838912 |
---|---|
author | Nundoochan, Ajoy |
author_facet | Nundoochan, Ajoy |
author_sort | Nundoochan, Ajoy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ensuring benefits of free healthcare services are accessible to those in need is essential to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). Mauritius has sustained a welfare state over four decades with free health services in all public facilities. However, paradoxically, the national UHC service coverage index stood at only 63 in 2017. An assessment of who benefits from health interventions is, therefore, vital to shape future health financing strategies. METHODS: The study applied benefit incidence analysis (BIA) to understand the distribution of healthcare utilisation and spending in comparison to income distribution. Also, a financial incidence analysis (FIA) was conducted to assess the progressivity of the health financing systems. Data from the national survey on household out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure for health were used for the purpose of BIA and FIA. Concentration curves and concentration indices (CI) were nationally estimated and disaggregated to rural/urban levels. Kakwani index (KI) was calculated to assess the progressivity of private healthcare financing. RESULTS: The CI for outpatient, inpatient and day care within the public health sector is estimated at −0.33, –0.14 and −0.14, respectively. Overall, CI in the public sector is −0.26. Benefit distribution in the private sector is pro-rich with CI of 0.27. Healthcare financing is regressive as demonstrated by a KI of −0.004, with the poorest population groups contributing a large share, in terms of taxes and OOP, to finance the health system. CONCLUSION: The BIA posits that government spending on public healthcare has resulted in significant pro-poor services distribution. This is largely offset by pro-rich distribution in the private sector. Thus, implying health financing strategies must be reviewed to promote financial protection against catastrophic health payments and bolster efforts to improve UHC service coverage index and achieve UHC Target 3.8 under Sustainable Development Goal 3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8710888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87108882022-01-10 Improving equity in the distribution and financing of health services in Mauritius, a small island state with deeply rooted welfare state standards Nundoochan, Ajoy BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Ensuring benefits of free healthcare services are accessible to those in need is essential to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). Mauritius has sustained a welfare state over four decades with free health services in all public facilities. However, paradoxically, the national UHC service coverage index stood at only 63 in 2017. An assessment of who benefits from health interventions is, therefore, vital to shape future health financing strategies. METHODS: The study applied benefit incidence analysis (BIA) to understand the distribution of healthcare utilisation and spending in comparison to income distribution. Also, a financial incidence analysis (FIA) was conducted to assess the progressivity of the health financing systems. Data from the national survey on household out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure for health were used for the purpose of BIA and FIA. Concentration curves and concentration indices (CI) were nationally estimated and disaggregated to rural/urban levels. Kakwani index (KI) was calculated to assess the progressivity of private healthcare financing. RESULTS: The CI for outpatient, inpatient and day care within the public health sector is estimated at −0.33, –0.14 and −0.14, respectively. Overall, CI in the public sector is −0.26. Benefit distribution in the private sector is pro-rich with CI of 0.27. Healthcare financing is regressive as demonstrated by a KI of −0.004, with the poorest population groups contributing a large share, in terms of taxes and OOP, to finance the health system. CONCLUSION: The BIA posits that government spending on public healthcare has resulted in significant pro-poor services distribution. This is largely offset by pro-rich distribution in the private sector. Thus, implying health financing strategies must be reviewed to promote financial protection against catastrophic health payments and bolster efforts to improve UHC service coverage index and achieve UHC Target 3.8 under Sustainable Development Goal 3. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8710888/ /pubmed/34952858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006757 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nundoochan, Ajoy Improving equity in the distribution and financing of health services in Mauritius, a small island state with deeply rooted welfare state standards |
title | Improving equity in the distribution and financing of health services in Mauritius, a small island state with deeply rooted welfare state standards |
title_full | Improving equity in the distribution and financing of health services in Mauritius, a small island state with deeply rooted welfare state standards |
title_fullStr | Improving equity in the distribution and financing of health services in Mauritius, a small island state with deeply rooted welfare state standards |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving equity in the distribution and financing of health services in Mauritius, a small island state with deeply rooted welfare state standards |
title_short | Improving equity in the distribution and financing of health services in Mauritius, a small island state with deeply rooted welfare state standards |
title_sort | improving equity in the distribution and financing of health services in mauritius, a small island state with deeply rooted welfare state standards |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8710888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006757 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nundoochanajoy improvingequityinthedistributionandfinancingofhealthservicesinmauritiusasmallislandstatewithdeeplyrootedwelfarestatestandards |