Cargando…
Comparative Natural History of Visual Function From Patients With Biallelic Variants in BBS1 and BBS10
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the natural history of visual function change in cohorts of patients affected with retinal degeneration due to biallelic variants in Bardet-Biedl syndrome genes: BBS1 and BBS10. METHODS: Patients were recruited from nine academic centers from six cou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8711006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.15.26 |
_version_ | 1784623288419352576 |
---|---|
author | Grudzinska Pechhacker, Monika K. Jacobson, Samuel G. Drack, Arlene V. Scipio, Matteo Di Strubbe, Ine Pfeifer, Wanda Duncan, Jacque L. Dollfus, Helene Goetz, Nathalie Muller, Jean Vincent, Andrea L. Aleman, Tomas S. Tumber, Anupreet Van Cauwenbergh, Caroline De Baere, Elfride Bedoukian, Emma Leroy, Bart P. Maynes, Jason T. Munier, Francis L. Tavares, Erika Saleh, Eman Vincent, Ajoy Heon, Elise |
author_facet | Grudzinska Pechhacker, Monika K. Jacobson, Samuel G. Drack, Arlene V. Scipio, Matteo Di Strubbe, Ine Pfeifer, Wanda Duncan, Jacque L. Dollfus, Helene Goetz, Nathalie Muller, Jean Vincent, Andrea L. Aleman, Tomas S. Tumber, Anupreet Van Cauwenbergh, Caroline De Baere, Elfride Bedoukian, Emma Leroy, Bart P. Maynes, Jason T. Munier, Francis L. Tavares, Erika Saleh, Eman Vincent, Ajoy Heon, Elise |
author_sort | Grudzinska Pechhacker, Monika K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the natural history of visual function change in cohorts of patients affected with retinal degeneration due to biallelic variants in Bardet-Biedl syndrome genes: BBS1 and BBS10. METHODS: Patients were recruited from nine academic centers from six countries (Belgium, Canada, France, New Zealand, Switzerland, and the United States). Inclusion criteria were: (1) female or male patients with a clinical diagnosis of retinal dystrophy, (2) biallelic disease-causing variants in BBS1 or BBS10, and (3) measures of visual function for at least one visit. Retrospective data collected included genotypes, age, onset of symptoms, and best corrected visual acuity (VA). When possible, data on refractive error, fundus images and autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomography (OCT), Goldmann kinetic perimetry (VF), electroretinography (ERG), and the systemic phenotype were collected. RESULTS: Sixty-seven individuals had variants in BBS1 (n = 38; 20 female patients and 18 male patients); or BBS10 (n = 29; 14 female patients and 15 male patients). Missense variants were the most common type of variants for patients with BBS1, whereas frameshift variants were most common for BBS10. When ERGs were recordable, rod-cone dystrophy (RCD) was observed in 82% (23/28) of patients with BBS1 and 73% (8/11) of patients with BBS10; cone-rod dystrophy (CORD) was seen in 18% of patients with BBS1 only, and cone dystrophy (COD) was only seen in 3 patients with BBS10 (27%). ERGs were nondetectable earlier in patients with BBS10 than in patients with BBS1. Similarly, VA and VF declined more rapidly in patients with BBS10 compared to patients with BBS1. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal degeneration appears earlier and is more severe in BBS10 cases as compared to those with BBS1 variants. The course of change of visual function appears to relate to genetic subtypes of BBS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8711006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87110062022-01-14 Comparative Natural History of Visual Function From Patients With Biallelic Variants in BBS1 and BBS10 Grudzinska Pechhacker, Monika K. Jacobson, Samuel G. Drack, Arlene V. Scipio, Matteo Di Strubbe, Ine Pfeifer, Wanda Duncan, Jacque L. Dollfus, Helene Goetz, Nathalie Muller, Jean Vincent, Andrea L. Aleman, Tomas S. Tumber, Anupreet Van Cauwenbergh, Caroline De Baere, Elfride Bedoukian, Emma Leroy, Bart P. Maynes, Jason T. Munier, Francis L. Tavares, Erika Saleh, Eman Vincent, Ajoy Heon, Elise Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Retina PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the natural history of visual function change in cohorts of patients affected with retinal degeneration due to biallelic variants in Bardet-Biedl syndrome genes: BBS1 and BBS10. METHODS: Patients were recruited from nine academic centers from six countries (Belgium, Canada, France, New Zealand, Switzerland, and the United States). Inclusion criteria were: (1) female or male patients with a clinical diagnosis of retinal dystrophy, (2) biallelic disease-causing variants in BBS1 or BBS10, and (3) measures of visual function for at least one visit. Retrospective data collected included genotypes, age, onset of symptoms, and best corrected visual acuity (VA). When possible, data on refractive error, fundus images and autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomography (OCT), Goldmann kinetic perimetry (VF), electroretinography (ERG), and the systemic phenotype were collected. RESULTS: Sixty-seven individuals had variants in BBS1 (n = 38; 20 female patients and 18 male patients); or BBS10 (n = 29; 14 female patients and 15 male patients). Missense variants were the most common type of variants for patients with BBS1, whereas frameshift variants were most common for BBS10. When ERGs were recordable, rod-cone dystrophy (RCD) was observed in 82% (23/28) of patients with BBS1 and 73% (8/11) of patients with BBS10; cone-rod dystrophy (CORD) was seen in 18% of patients with BBS1 only, and cone dystrophy (COD) was only seen in 3 patients with BBS10 (27%). ERGs were nondetectable earlier in patients with BBS10 than in patients with BBS1. Similarly, VA and VF declined more rapidly in patients with BBS10 compared to patients with BBS1. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal degeneration appears earlier and is more severe in BBS10 cases as compared to those with BBS1 variants. The course of change of visual function appears to relate to genetic subtypes of BBS. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8711006/ /pubmed/34940782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.15.26 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Retina Grudzinska Pechhacker, Monika K. Jacobson, Samuel G. Drack, Arlene V. Scipio, Matteo Di Strubbe, Ine Pfeifer, Wanda Duncan, Jacque L. Dollfus, Helene Goetz, Nathalie Muller, Jean Vincent, Andrea L. Aleman, Tomas S. Tumber, Anupreet Van Cauwenbergh, Caroline De Baere, Elfride Bedoukian, Emma Leroy, Bart P. Maynes, Jason T. Munier, Francis L. Tavares, Erika Saleh, Eman Vincent, Ajoy Heon, Elise Comparative Natural History of Visual Function From Patients With Biallelic Variants in BBS1 and BBS10 |
title | Comparative Natural History of Visual Function From Patients With Biallelic Variants in BBS1 and BBS10 |
title_full | Comparative Natural History of Visual Function From Patients With Biallelic Variants in BBS1 and BBS10 |
title_fullStr | Comparative Natural History of Visual Function From Patients With Biallelic Variants in BBS1 and BBS10 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Natural History of Visual Function From Patients With Biallelic Variants in BBS1 and BBS10 |
title_short | Comparative Natural History of Visual Function From Patients With Biallelic Variants in BBS1 and BBS10 |
title_sort | comparative natural history of visual function from patients with biallelic variants in bbs1 and bbs10 |
topic | Retina |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8711006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.15.26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grudzinskapechhackermonikak comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT jacobsonsamuelg comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT drackarlenev comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT scipiomatteodi comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT strubbeine comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT pfeiferwanda comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT duncanjacquel comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT dollfushelene comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT goetznathalie comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT mullerjean comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT vincentandreal comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT alemantomass comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT tumberanupreet comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT vancauwenberghcaroline comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT debaereelfride comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT bedoukianemma comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT leroybartp comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT maynesjasont comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT munierfrancisl comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT tavareserika comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT saleheman comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT vincentajoy comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 AT heonelise comparativenaturalhistoryofvisualfunctionfrompatientswithbiallelicvariantsinbbs1andbbs10 |