Cargando…
Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox
EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8711069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34963791 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6933 |
_version_ | 1784623300338515968 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Gubbins, Simon Aznar, Inma Broglia, Alessandro |
author_facet | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Gubbins, Simon Aznar, Inma Broglia, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for sheep and goat pox. In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different risk‐based sampling procedures based on clinical visits and laboratory testing are assessed in case of outbreak suspicion, granting animal movements and for repopulation purposes. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective. The estimated probability of transmission beyond the protection zone of 3 km radius from an infectious establishment is 9.6% (95% CI: 3.1–25.8%) and 2.3% (95% CI: 1–5.5%) for the surveillance zone of 10 km radius. This may be considered sufficient to contain the disease spread (95% probability of containing transmission corresponds to 5.3 Km). To contain 99% of the spread, the radius should be increased to 19.4 km (95% CI: 9.8–26.8). This may increase the number of farms in the surveillance zone, since the area would increase fourfold. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8711069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87110692021-12-27 Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Gubbins, Simon Aznar, Inma Broglia, Alessandro EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for sheep and goat pox. In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different risk‐based sampling procedures based on clinical visits and laboratory testing are assessed in case of outbreak suspicion, granting animal movements and for repopulation purposes. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective. The estimated probability of transmission beyond the protection zone of 3 km radius from an infectious establishment is 9.6% (95% CI: 3.1–25.8%) and 2.3% (95% CI: 1–5.5%) for the surveillance zone of 10 km radius. This may be considered sufficient to contain the disease spread (95% probability of containing transmission corresponds to 5.3 Km). To contain 99% of the spread, the radius should be increased to 19.4 km (95% CI: 9.8–26.8). This may increase the number of farms in the surveillance zone, since the area would increase fourfold. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8711069/ /pubmed/34963791 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6933 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Gubbins, Simon Aznar, Inma Broglia, Alessandro Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox |
title | Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox |
title_full | Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox |
title_short | Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox |
title_sort | assessment of the control measures of the category a diseases of animal health law: sheep and goat pox |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8711069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34963791 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6933 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT nielsensørensaxmose assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT alvarezjulio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT bicoutdominiquejoseph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT calistripaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT canalielisabetta assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT drewejulianashley assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT garinbastujibruno assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT gortazarchristian assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT herskinmette assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT michelvirginie assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT mirandachuecamiguelangel assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT padalinobarbara assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT pasqualipaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT sihvonenliisahelena assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT spoolderhans assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT stahlkarl assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT velardeantonio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT viltroparvo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT wincklerchristoph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT declercqkris assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT gubbinssimon assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT aznarinma assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox AT brogliaalessandro assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox |