Cargando…

Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox

EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Alvarez, Julio, Bicout, Dominique Joseph, Calistri, Paolo, Canali, Elisabetta, Drewe, Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Gonzales Rojas, José Luis, Gortázar, Christian, Herskin, Mette, Michel, Virginie, Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel, Padalino, Barbara, Pasquali, Paolo, Sihvonen, Liisa Helena, Spoolder, Hans, Ståhl, Karl, Velarde, Antonio, Viltrop, Arvo, Winckler, Christoph, De Clercq, Kris, Gubbins, Simon, Aznar, Inma, Broglia, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8711069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34963791
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6933
_version_ 1784623300338515968
author Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Gubbins, Simon
Aznar, Inma
Broglia, Alessandro
author_facet Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Gubbins, Simon
Aznar, Inma
Broglia, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for sheep and goat pox. In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different risk‐based sampling procedures based on clinical visits and laboratory testing are assessed in case of outbreak suspicion, granting animal movements and for repopulation purposes. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective. The estimated probability of transmission beyond the protection zone of 3 km radius from an infectious establishment is 9.6% (95% CI: 3.1–25.8%) and 2.3% (95% CI: 1–5.5%) for the surveillance zone of 10 km radius. This may be considered sufficient to contain the disease spread (95% probability of containing transmission corresponds to 5.3 Km). To contain 99% of the spread, the radius should be increased to 19.4 km (95% CI: 9.8–26.8). This may increase the number of farms in the surveillance zone, since the area would increase fourfold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8711069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87110692021-12-27 Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Gubbins, Simon Aznar, Inma Broglia, Alessandro EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for sheep and goat pox. In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different risk‐based sampling procedures based on clinical visits and laboratory testing are assessed in case of outbreak suspicion, granting animal movements and for repopulation purposes. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective. The estimated probability of transmission beyond the protection zone of 3 km radius from an infectious establishment is 9.6% (95% CI: 3.1–25.8%) and 2.3% (95% CI: 1–5.5%) for the surveillance zone of 10 km radius. This may be considered sufficient to contain the disease spread (95% probability of containing transmission corresponds to 5.3 Km). To contain 99% of the spread, the radius should be increased to 19.4 km (95% CI: 9.8–26.8). This may increase the number of farms in the surveillance zone, since the area would increase fourfold. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8711069/ /pubmed/34963791 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6933 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Gubbins, Simon
Aznar, Inma
Broglia, Alessandro
Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox
title Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox
title_full Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox
title_fullStr Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox
title_short Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox
title_sort assessment of the control measures of the category a diseases of animal health law: sheep and goat pox
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8711069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34963791
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6933
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT nielsensørensaxmose assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT alvarezjulio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT bicoutdominiquejoseph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT calistripaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT canalielisabetta assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT drewejulianashley assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT garinbastujibruno assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT gortazarchristian assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT herskinmette assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT michelvirginie assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT mirandachuecamiguelangel assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT padalinobarbara assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT pasqualipaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT sihvonenliisahelena assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT spoolderhans assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT stahlkarl assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT velardeantonio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT viltroparvo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT wincklerchristoph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT declercqkris assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT gubbinssimon assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT aznarinma assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox
AT brogliaalessandro assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawsheepandgoatpox