Cargando…

Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

AIMS: The primary objective of this study was to compare the postoperative infection rate between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional dressings for closed incisions following soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare rates of adverse wound events and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shields, David W., Razii, Nima, Doonan, James, Mahendra, Ashish, Gupta, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8711667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0103.R1
_version_ 1784623410678071296
author Shields, David W.
Razii, Nima
Doonan, James
Mahendra, Ashish
Gupta, Sanjay
author_facet Shields, David W.
Razii, Nima
Doonan, James
Mahendra, Ashish
Gupta, Sanjay
author_sort Shields, David W.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The primary objective of this study was to compare the postoperative infection rate between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional dressings for closed incisions following soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare rates of adverse wound events and functional scores. METHODS: In this prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients were randomized to either NPWT or conventional sterile occlusive dressings. A total of 17 patients, with a mean age of 54 years (21 to 81), were successfully recruited and none were lost to follow-up. Wound reviews were undertaken to identify any surgical site infection (SSI) or adverse wound events within 30 days. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score were recorded as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). RESULTS: There were two out of seven patients in the control group (28.6%), and two out of ten patients in the intervention group (20%) who were diagnosed with a SSI (p > 0.999), while one additional adverse wound event was identified in the control group (p = 0.593). No significant differences in PROMs were identified between the groups at either 30 days (TESS, p = 0.987; MSTS, p = 0.951) or six-month (TESS, p = 0.400) follow-up. However, neoadjuvant radiotherapy was significantly associated with a SSI within 30 days of surgery, across all patients (p = 0.029). The mean preoperative modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) was also significantly higher among patients who developed a postoperative adverse wound event (p = 0.028), including a SSI (p = 0.008), across both groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first RCT comparing NPWT with conventional dressings following musculoskeletal tumour surgery. Postoperative wound complications are common in this group of patients and we observed an overall SSI rate of 23.5%. We propose proceeding to a multicentre trial, which will help more clearly define the role of closed incision NPWT in STS surgery. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1049–1056.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8711667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87116672022-01-13 Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial Shields, David W. Razii, Nima Doonan, James Mahendra, Ashish Gupta, Sanjay Bone Jt Open Oncology AIMS: The primary objective of this study was to compare the postoperative infection rate between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional dressings for closed incisions following soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare rates of adverse wound events and functional scores. METHODS: In this prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients were randomized to either NPWT or conventional sterile occlusive dressings. A total of 17 patients, with a mean age of 54 years (21 to 81), were successfully recruited and none were lost to follow-up. Wound reviews were undertaken to identify any surgical site infection (SSI) or adverse wound events within 30 days. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score were recorded as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). RESULTS: There were two out of seven patients in the control group (28.6%), and two out of ten patients in the intervention group (20%) who were diagnosed with a SSI (p > 0.999), while one additional adverse wound event was identified in the control group (p = 0.593). No significant differences in PROMs were identified between the groups at either 30 days (TESS, p = 0.987; MSTS, p = 0.951) or six-month (TESS, p = 0.400) follow-up. However, neoadjuvant radiotherapy was significantly associated with a SSI within 30 days of surgery, across all patients (p = 0.029). The mean preoperative modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) was also significantly higher among patients who developed a postoperative adverse wound event (p = 0.028), including a SSI (p = 0.008), across both groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first RCT comparing NPWT with conventional dressings following musculoskeletal tumour surgery. Postoperative wound complications are common in this group of patients and we observed an overall SSI rate of 23.5%. We propose proceeding to a multicentre trial, which will help more clearly define the role of closed incision NPWT in STS surgery. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1049–1056. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8711667/ /pubmed/34905941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0103.R1 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Shields, David W.
Razii, Nima
Doonan, James
Mahendra, Ashish
Gupta, Sanjay
Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_short Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_sort closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8711667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0103.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT shieldsdavidw closedincisionnegativepressurewoundtherapyversusconventionaldressingsfollowingsofttissuesarcomaexcisionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT raziinima closedincisionnegativepressurewoundtherapyversusconventionaldressingsfollowingsofttissuesarcomaexcisionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT doonanjames closedincisionnegativepressurewoundtherapyversusconventionaldressingsfollowingsofttissuesarcomaexcisionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mahendraashish closedincisionnegativepressurewoundtherapyversusconventionaldressingsfollowingsofttissuesarcomaexcisionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guptasanjay closedincisionnegativepressurewoundtherapyversusconventionaldressingsfollowingsofttissuesarcomaexcisionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial