Cargando…

Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Early After COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

The incidence of thromboembolic complications in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is well recognized. The present study retrospectively evaluated the type and prevalence of lung perfusion defects in early–post-COVID-19 patients with hypoxia and was aimed to identify the risk factors for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sajal, De, Mudalsha, Ravina, Tinu, Lukose, Ranganath, T. Ganga, Dibakar, Sahu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Nuclear Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34330803
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.121.262440
_version_ 1784623594405363712
author Sajal, De
Mudalsha, Ravina
Tinu, Lukose
Ranganath, T. Ganga
Dibakar, Sahu
author_facet Sajal, De
Mudalsha, Ravina
Tinu, Lukose
Ranganath, T. Ganga
Dibakar, Sahu
author_sort Sajal, De
collection PubMed
description The incidence of thromboembolic complications in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is well recognized. The present study retrospectively evaluated the type and prevalence of lung perfusion defects in early–post-COVID-19 patients with hypoxia and was aimed to identify the risk factors for mismatched perfusion defects. Methods: We analyzed SPECT/CT images of 54 early–post-COVID-19 patients (44 men and 10 women). Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the risk. Results: The mean age of the study population was 55.4 y (range, 34–76 y). All received prophylactic anticoagulation from the day of hospitalization to the date of perfusion scanning. The median interval between COVID-19–positive reports and lung perfusion scanning was 22 d. Lung perfusion defects (of any type) were observed in most (87%). Twenty-three subjects (42.6%) had mismatched perfusion defects. Mismatched perfusion defects were segmental in 14 subjects (25.9%) and subsegmental in 11 (20.4%). Higher age was a risk factor for mismatched perfusion defects (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99–1.13; P = 0.06). Subjects with a serum D-dimer level of at least 2,500 ng/mL on the day before the scan were not at higher risk for having mismatched perfusion defects (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.34–3.9; P = 0.83). Conclusion: Despite prophylactic anticoagulation, mismatched perfusion defects suggestive of pulmonary thromboembolism were observed. Serum D-dimer level in patients early after COVID-19 is a poor predictor of mismatched perfusion defects. Confirmed evidence of pulmonary embolism by imaging studies should support the decision to extend anticoagulant prophylaxis in post-COVID-19 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8712630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Society of Nuclear Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87126302022-01-21 Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Early After COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Sajal, De Mudalsha, Ravina Tinu, Lukose Ranganath, T. Ganga Dibakar, Sahu J Nucl Med Technol Imaging The incidence of thromboembolic complications in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is well recognized. The present study retrospectively evaluated the type and prevalence of lung perfusion defects in early–post-COVID-19 patients with hypoxia and was aimed to identify the risk factors for mismatched perfusion defects. Methods: We analyzed SPECT/CT images of 54 early–post-COVID-19 patients (44 men and 10 women). Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the risk. Results: The mean age of the study population was 55.4 y (range, 34–76 y). All received prophylactic anticoagulation from the day of hospitalization to the date of perfusion scanning. The median interval between COVID-19–positive reports and lung perfusion scanning was 22 d. Lung perfusion defects (of any type) were observed in most (87%). Twenty-three subjects (42.6%) had mismatched perfusion defects. Mismatched perfusion defects were segmental in 14 subjects (25.9%) and subsegmental in 11 (20.4%). Higher age was a risk factor for mismatched perfusion defects (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99–1.13; P = 0.06). Subjects with a serum D-dimer level of at least 2,500 ng/mL on the day before the scan were not at higher risk for having mismatched perfusion defects (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.34–3.9; P = 0.83). Conclusion: Despite prophylactic anticoagulation, mismatched perfusion defects suggestive of pulmonary thromboembolism were observed. Serum D-dimer level in patients early after COVID-19 is a poor predictor of mismatched perfusion defects. Confirmed evidence of pulmonary embolism by imaging studies should support the decision to extend anticoagulant prophylaxis in post-COVID-19 patients. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8712630/ /pubmed/34330803 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.121.262440 Text en © 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.
spellingShingle Imaging
Sajal, De
Mudalsha, Ravina
Tinu, Lukose
Ranganath, T. Ganga
Dibakar, Sahu
Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Early After COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Early After COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_full Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Early After COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Early After COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Early After COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_short Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Early After COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_sort lung perfusion scintigraphy early after covid-19: a single-center retrospective study
topic Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34330803
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.121.262440
work_keys_str_mv AT sajalde lungperfusionscintigraphyearlyaftercovid19asinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT mudalsharavina lungperfusionscintigraphyearlyaftercovid19asinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT tinulukose lungperfusionscintigraphyearlyaftercovid19asinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT ranganathtganga lungperfusionscintigraphyearlyaftercovid19asinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT dibakarsahu lungperfusionscintigraphyearlyaftercovid19asinglecenterretrospectivestudy