Cargando…
Effects of Illness Management and Recovery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
There have been inconsistent findings in the literature with respect to the efficacy of Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) in the psychosocial treatment of people with schizophrenia or other severe mental illnesses. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the effectiveness of IMR, includi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34970161 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.723435 |
_version_ | 1784623597116981248 |
---|---|
author | Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan van Weeghel, Jaap Deen, Mathijs L. van Esveld, Emmie W. Kamperman, Astrid M. Mulder, Cornelis L. |
author_facet | Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan van Weeghel, Jaap Deen, Mathijs L. van Esveld, Emmie W. Kamperman, Astrid M. Mulder, Cornelis L. |
author_sort | Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | There have been inconsistent findings in the literature with respect to the efficacy of Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) in the psychosocial treatment of people with schizophrenia or other severe mental illnesses. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the effectiveness of IMR, including the impact of completion and fidelity. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), 187 outpatients received either IMR plus care as usual (CAU) or only CAU. Multilevel modeling was implemented to investigate group differences over an 18-month period, comprising 12 months of treatment and six months of follow-up. The primary outcome was overall illness management, which was assessed using the client version of the IMR scale. Secondary outcomes included measures regarding illness management, clinical, personal, and functional recovery, and hospitalizations. The interviewers were blinded to group allocation. This clinical trial was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NL4931, NTR5033). Patients who received IMR showed statistically significant improvement in self-reported overall illness management (the primary outcome). Moreover, they showed an improvement in self-esteem, which is a component of personal recovery. There were no effects within the other questionnaires. There were also no statistically significant between-group differences in terms of hospitalizations. Patients in both groups showed statistically significant improvement in clinician-rated overall illness management, social support, clinical and functional recovery, and self-stigma over time. IMR completion was associated with stronger effects. High IMR fidelity was associated with self-esteem. This study confirms the efficacy of IMR in overall illness self-management. To our knowledge, this is the first RCT on IMR to explore the impact of fidelity on treatment efficacy. Future studies should further establish efficacy in personal recovery. To improve efficacy, it appears important to promote IMR completion and fidelity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8712643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87126432021-12-29 Effects of Illness Management and Recovery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan van Weeghel, Jaap Deen, Mathijs L. van Esveld, Emmie W. Kamperman, Astrid M. Mulder, Cornelis L. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry There have been inconsistent findings in the literature with respect to the efficacy of Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) in the psychosocial treatment of people with schizophrenia or other severe mental illnesses. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the effectiveness of IMR, including the impact of completion and fidelity. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), 187 outpatients received either IMR plus care as usual (CAU) or only CAU. Multilevel modeling was implemented to investigate group differences over an 18-month period, comprising 12 months of treatment and six months of follow-up. The primary outcome was overall illness management, which was assessed using the client version of the IMR scale. Secondary outcomes included measures regarding illness management, clinical, personal, and functional recovery, and hospitalizations. The interviewers were blinded to group allocation. This clinical trial was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NL4931, NTR5033). Patients who received IMR showed statistically significant improvement in self-reported overall illness management (the primary outcome). Moreover, they showed an improvement in self-esteem, which is a component of personal recovery. There were no effects within the other questionnaires. There were also no statistically significant between-group differences in terms of hospitalizations. Patients in both groups showed statistically significant improvement in clinician-rated overall illness management, social support, clinical and functional recovery, and self-stigma over time. IMR completion was associated with stronger effects. High IMR fidelity was associated with self-esteem. This study confirms the efficacy of IMR in overall illness self-management. To our knowledge, this is the first RCT on IMR to explore the impact of fidelity on treatment efficacy. Future studies should further establish efficacy in personal recovery. To improve efficacy, it appears important to promote IMR completion and fidelity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8712643/ /pubmed/34970161 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.723435 Text en Copyright © 2021 Roosenschoon, van Weeghel, Deen, van Esveld, Kamperman and Mulder. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan van Weeghel, Jaap Deen, Mathijs L. van Esveld, Emmie W. Kamperman, Astrid M. Mulder, Cornelis L. Effects of Illness Management and Recovery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Effects of Illness Management and Recovery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Effects of Illness Management and Recovery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Effects of Illness Management and Recovery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Illness Management and Recovery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Effects of Illness Management and Recovery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effects of illness management and recovery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34970161 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.723435 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roosenschoonbertjan effectsofillnessmanagementandrecoveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanweegheljaap effectsofillnessmanagementandrecoveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT deenmathijsl effectsofillnessmanagementandrecoveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanesveldemmiew effectsofillnessmanagementandrecoveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kampermanastridm effectsofillnessmanagementandrecoveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT muldercornelisl effectsofillnessmanagementandrecoveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |