Cargando…

Comparative study of the adverse event profile of hydroxychloroquine before and during the Sars-CoV2 pandemic

AIMS: At the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, there were no clinically-tested medications for the effective treatment of coronavirus disease. In this context, on 5 March 2020, the French Public Health Council issued several recommendations for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lory, Pauline, Lombardi, Jeffrey, Lacroix, Clémence, Sanchez-Pena, Paola, Romani, Serena, Grandvuillemin, Aurélie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35568573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2021.12.015
_version_ 1784623603621298176
author Lory, Pauline
Lombardi, Jeffrey
Lacroix, Clémence
Sanchez-Pena, Paola
Romani, Serena
Grandvuillemin, Aurélie
author_facet Lory, Pauline
Lombardi, Jeffrey
Lacroix, Clémence
Sanchez-Pena, Paola
Romani, Serena
Grandvuillemin, Aurélie
author_sort Lory, Pauline
collection PubMed
description AIMS: At the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, there were no clinically-tested medications for the effective treatment of coronavirus disease. In this context, on 5 March 2020, the French Public Health Council issued several recommendations for the therapeutic management of this new disease, including the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). An unexpected cardiovascular safety signal was quickly identified as being more frequent than expected thanks to the reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) submitted to French regional pharmacovigilance centres (RPVC). The objective of this study was to compare all ADRs reported with HCQ used in its usual indication, collected before the pandemic period (1985 to 31 December, 2019) with those reported with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) indication (1 January to 21 July, 2020). METHODS: For this purpose, reports were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database and analysed for these two periods. RESULTS: Our study showed a different safety profile in COVID-19 patients with more cardiac disorders (57% of ADRs versus 5% before the pandemic period), especially QT interval prolongation, resulting from an interaction with azithromycin in more than 20% of cases. Hepatobiliary disorders were also significantly more frequent. CONCLUSIONS: These observations could be associated with the effect of the virus itself on the various organs, the profile of the patients treated, and concomitant drug treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8712669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87126692021-12-28 Comparative study of the adverse event profile of hydroxychloroquine before and during the Sars-CoV2 pandemic Lory, Pauline Lombardi, Jeffrey Lacroix, Clémence Sanchez-Pena, Paola Romani, Serena Grandvuillemin, Aurélie Therapie Pharmacovigilance AIMS: At the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, there were no clinically-tested medications for the effective treatment of coronavirus disease. In this context, on 5 March 2020, the French Public Health Council issued several recommendations for the therapeutic management of this new disease, including the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). An unexpected cardiovascular safety signal was quickly identified as being more frequent than expected thanks to the reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) submitted to French regional pharmacovigilance centres (RPVC). The objective of this study was to compare all ADRs reported with HCQ used in its usual indication, collected before the pandemic period (1985 to 31 December, 2019) with those reported with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) indication (1 January to 21 July, 2020). METHODS: For this purpose, reports were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database and analysed for these two periods. RESULTS: Our study showed a different safety profile in COVID-19 patients with more cardiac disorders (57% of ADRs versus 5% before the pandemic period), especially QT interval prolongation, resulting from an interaction with azithromycin in more than 20% of cases. Hepatobiliary disorders were also significantly more frequent. CONCLUSIONS: These observations could be associated with the effect of the virus itself on the various organs, the profile of the patients treated, and concomitant drug treatments. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. 2022 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8712669/ /pubmed/35568573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2021.12.015 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Pharmacovigilance
Lory, Pauline
Lombardi, Jeffrey
Lacroix, Clémence
Sanchez-Pena, Paola
Romani, Serena
Grandvuillemin, Aurélie
Comparative study of the adverse event profile of hydroxychloroquine before and during the Sars-CoV2 pandemic
title Comparative study of the adverse event profile of hydroxychloroquine before and during the Sars-CoV2 pandemic
title_full Comparative study of the adverse event profile of hydroxychloroquine before and during the Sars-CoV2 pandemic
title_fullStr Comparative study of the adverse event profile of hydroxychloroquine before and during the Sars-CoV2 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of the adverse event profile of hydroxychloroquine before and during the Sars-CoV2 pandemic
title_short Comparative study of the adverse event profile of hydroxychloroquine before and during the Sars-CoV2 pandemic
title_sort comparative study of the adverse event profile of hydroxychloroquine before and during the sars-cov2 pandemic
topic Pharmacovigilance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35568573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2021.12.015
work_keys_str_mv AT lorypauline comparativestudyoftheadverseeventprofileofhydroxychloroquinebeforeandduringthesarscov2pandemic
AT lombardijeffrey comparativestudyoftheadverseeventprofileofhydroxychloroquinebeforeandduringthesarscov2pandemic
AT lacroixclemence comparativestudyoftheadverseeventprofileofhydroxychloroquinebeforeandduringthesarscov2pandemic
AT sanchezpenapaola comparativestudyoftheadverseeventprofileofhydroxychloroquinebeforeandduringthesarscov2pandemic
AT romaniserena comparativestudyoftheadverseeventprofileofhydroxychloroquinebeforeandduringthesarscov2pandemic
AT grandvuilleminaurelie comparativestudyoftheadverseeventprofileofhydroxychloroquinebeforeandduringthesarscov2pandemic
AT comparativestudyoftheadverseeventprofileofhydroxychloroquinebeforeandduringthesarscov2pandemic