Cargando…

A Diagnostic Nomogram Based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Bone Metastasis of Gastric Cancer

Purpose: To develop an effective diagnostic model for bone metastasis of gastric cancer by combining (18)F-FDG PET/CT and clinical data. Materials and Methods: A total of 212 gastric cancer patients with abnormal bone imaging scans based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively enrolled between Sept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Chunhui, Lin, Xiaoping, Li, Zhoulei, Chen, Zhifeng, Xie, Wenhui, Zhang, Xiangsong, Wang, Xiaoyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34970546
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.783466
_version_ 1784623624544583680
author Wu, Chunhui
Lin, Xiaoping
Li, Zhoulei
Chen, Zhifeng
Xie, Wenhui
Zhang, Xiangsong
Wang, Xiaoyan
author_facet Wu, Chunhui
Lin, Xiaoping
Li, Zhoulei
Chen, Zhifeng
Xie, Wenhui
Zhang, Xiangsong
Wang, Xiaoyan
author_sort Wu, Chunhui
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To develop an effective diagnostic model for bone metastasis of gastric cancer by combining (18)F-FDG PET/CT and clinical data. Materials and Methods: A total of 212 gastric cancer patients with abnormal bone imaging scans based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively enrolled between September 2009 and March 2020. Risk factors for bone metastasis of gastric cancer were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis and used to create a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration plots. Results: The diagnostic power of the binary logistic regression model incorporating skeleton-related symptoms, anemia, the SUVmax of bone lesions, bone changes, the location of bone lesions, ALP, LDH, CEA, and CA19-9 was significantly higher than that of the model using only clinical factors (p = 0.008). The diagnostic model for bone metastasis of gastric cancer using a combination of clinical and imaging data showed an appropriate goodness of fit according to a calibration test (p = 0.294) and good discriminating ability (AUC = 0.925). Conclusions: The diagnostic model combined with the (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings and clinical data showed a better diagnosis performance for bone metastasis of gastric cancer than the other studied models. Compared with the model using clinical factors alone, the additional (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings could improve the diagnostic efficacy of identifying bone metastases in gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8712756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87127562021-12-29 A Diagnostic Nomogram Based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Bone Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Wu, Chunhui Lin, Xiaoping Li, Zhoulei Chen, Zhifeng Xie, Wenhui Zhang, Xiangsong Wang, Xiaoyan Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Purpose: To develop an effective diagnostic model for bone metastasis of gastric cancer by combining (18)F-FDG PET/CT and clinical data. Materials and Methods: A total of 212 gastric cancer patients with abnormal bone imaging scans based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively enrolled between September 2009 and March 2020. Risk factors for bone metastasis of gastric cancer were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis and used to create a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration plots. Results: The diagnostic power of the binary logistic regression model incorporating skeleton-related symptoms, anemia, the SUVmax of bone lesions, bone changes, the location of bone lesions, ALP, LDH, CEA, and CA19-9 was significantly higher than that of the model using only clinical factors (p = 0.008). The diagnostic model for bone metastasis of gastric cancer using a combination of clinical and imaging data showed an appropriate goodness of fit according to a calibration test (p = 0.294) and good discriminating ability (AUC = 0.925). Conclusions: The diagnostic model combined with the (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings and clinical data showed a better diagnosis performance for bone metastasis of gastric cancer than the other studied models. Compared with the model using clinical factors alone, the additional (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings could improve the diagnostic efficacy of identifying bone metastases in gastric cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8712756/ /pubmed/34970546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.783466 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wu, Lin, Li, Chen, Xie, Zhang and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cell and Developmental Biology
Wu, Chunhui
Lin, Xiaoping
Li, Zhoulei
Chen, Zhifeng
Xie, Wenhui
Zhang, Xiangsong
Wang, Xiaoyan
A Diagnostic Nomogram Based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Bone Metastasis of Gastric Cancer
title A Diagnostic Nomogram Based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Bone Metastasis of Gastric Cancer
title_full A Diagnostic Nomogram Based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Bone Metastasis of Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr A Diagnostic Nomogram Based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Bone Metastasis of Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed A Diagnostic Nomogram Based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Bone Metastasis of Gastric Cancer
title_short A Diagnostic Nomogram Based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Bone Metastasis of Gastric Cancer
title_sort diagnostic nomogram based on (18)f-fdg pet/ct for bone metastasis of gastric cancer
topic Cell and Developmental Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34970546
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.783466
work_keys_str_mv AT wuchunhui adiagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT linxiaoping adiagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT lizhoulei adiagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT chenzhifeng adiagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT xiewenhui adiagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT zhangxiangsong adiagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT wangxiaoyan adiagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT wuchunhui diagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT linxiaoping diagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT lizhoulei diagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT chenzhifeng diagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT xiewenhui diagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT zhangxiangsong diagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer
AT wangxiaoyan diagnosticnomogrambasedon18ffdgpetctforbonemetastasisofgastriccancer