Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure patients: the LAICA study

AIMS: The aim of the LAICA study was to evaluate the long‐term effectiveness and safety of intermittent levosimendan infusion in patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial of intermittent levos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García‐González, Martín J., Aldea Perona, Ana, Lara Padron, Antonio, Morales Rull, José Luis, Martínez‐Sellés, Manuel, de Mora Martin, Manuel, López Díaz, Javier, López Fernandez, Silvia, Ortiz Oficialdegui, Pilar, Jiménez Sosa, Alejandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13670
_version_ 1784623630153416704
author García‐González, Martín J.
Aldea Perona, Ana
Lara Padron, Antonio
Morales Rull, José Luis
Martínez‐Sellés, Manuel
de Mora Martin, Manuel
López Díaz, Javier
López Fernandez, Silvia
Ortiz Oficialdegui, Pilar
Jiménez Sosa, Alejandro
author_facet García‐González, Martín J.
Aldea Perona, Ana
Lara Padron, Antonio
Morales Rull, José Luis
Martínez‐Sellés, Manuel
de Mora Martin, Manuel
López Díaz, Javier
López Fernandez, Silvia
Ortiz Oficialdegui, Pilar
Jiménez Sosa, Alejandro
author_sort García‐González, Martín J.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of the LAICA study was to evaluate the long‐term effectiveness and safety of intermittent levosimendan infusion in patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial of intermittent levosimendan 0.1 μg/kg/min as a continuous 24‐h intravenous infusion administered once monthly for 1 year in patients with AdHF. The primary endpoint [incidence of rehospitalization (admission to the emergency department or hospital ward for >12 h) for acute decompensated HF or clinical deterioration of the underlying HF] occurred in 23/70 (33%) of the levosimendan group (Group I) and 12/27 (44%) of the placebo group (Group II) (P = 0.286). The incidence of hospital readmissions for acute decompensated HF (Group I vs. Group II) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 4.2% vs. 18.2% (P = 0.036); 12.8% vs. 33.3% (P = 0.02); 25.7% vs. 40.7% (P = 0.147); 32.8% vs. 44.4% (P = 0.28), respectively. In a secondary pre‐specified time‐to‐event analysis no differences were observed in admission for acute decompensated HF between patients treated with levosimendan compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.66; 95% CI, 0.32–1.32; P = 0.24). Cumulative incidence for the aggregated endpoint of acute decompensation of HF and/or death at 1 and 3 months were significatively lower in the levosimendan group than in placebo group [5.7% vs. 25.9% (P = 0.004) and 17.1% vs. 48.1% (P = 0.001), respectively], but not at 6 and 12 months [34.2% vs. 59.2% (P = 0.025); 41.4% vs. 66.6% (P = 0.022), respectively]. Survival probability was significantly higher in patients who received levosimendan compared with those who received placebo (log rank: 4.06; P = 0.044). There were no clinically relevant differences in tolerability between levosimendan and placebo and no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, intermittent levosimendan in patients with AdHF produced a statistically non‐significant reduction in the incidence of hospital readmissions for acute decompensated HF, a significantly lower cumulative incidence of acute decompensation of HF and/or death at 1 and 3 month of treatment and a significant improvement in survival during 12 months of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8712777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87127772022-01-04 Efficacy and safety of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure patients: the LAICA study García‐González, Martín J. Aldea Perona, Ana Lara Padron, Antonio Morales Rull, José Luis Martínez‐Sellés, Manuel de Mora Martin, Manuel López Díaz, Javier López Fernandez, Silvia Ortiz Oficialdegui, Pilar Jiménez Sosa, Alejandro ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: The aim of the LAICA study was to evaluate the long‐term effectiveness and safety of intermittent levosimendan infusion in patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial of intermittent levosimendan 0.1 μg/kg/min as a continuous 24‐h intravenous infusion administered once monthly for 1 year in patients with AdHF. The primary endpoint [incidence of rehospitalization (admission to the emergency department or hospital ward for >12 h) for acute decompensated HF or clinical deterioration of the underlying HF] occurred in 23/70 (33%) of the levosimendan group (Group I) and 12/27 (44%) of the placebo group (Group II) (P = 0.286). The incidence of hospital readmissions for acute decompensated HF (Group I vs. Group II) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 4.2% vs. 18.2% (P = 0.036); 12.8% vs. 33.3% (P = 0.02); 25.7% vs. 40.7% (P = 0.147); 32.8% vs. 44.4% (P = 0.28), respectively. In a secondary pre‐specified time‐to‐event analysis no differences were observed in admission for acute decompensated HF between patients treated with levosimendan compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.66; 95% CI, 0.32–1.32; P = 0.24). Cumulative incidence for the aggregated endpoint of acute decompensation of HF and/or death at 1 and 3 months were significatively lower in the levosimendan group than in placebo group [5.7% vs. 25.9% (P = 0.004) and 17.1% vs. 48.1% (P = 0.001), respectively], but not at 6 and 12 months [34.2% vs. 59.2% (P = 0.025); 41.4% vs. 66.6% (P = 0.022), respectively]. Survival probability was significantly higher in patients who received levosimendan compared with those who received placebo (log rank: 4.06; P = 0.044). There were no clinically relevant differences in tolerability between levosimendan and placebo and no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, intermittent levosimendan in patients with AdHF produced a statistically non‐significant reduction in the incidence of hospital readmissions for acute decompensated HF, a significantly lower cumulative incidence of acute decompensation of HF and/or death at 1 and 3 month of treatment and a significant improvement in survival during 12 months of treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8712777/ /pubmed/34716753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13670 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
García‐González, Martín J.
Aldea Perona, Ana
Lara Padron, Antonio
Morales Rull, José Luis
Martínez‐Sellés, Manuel
de Mora Martin, Manuel
López Díaz, Javier
López Fernandez, Silvia
Ortiz Oficialdegui, Pilar
Jiménez Sosa, Alejandro
Efficacy and safety of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure patients: the LAICA study
title Efficacy and safety of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure patients: the LAICA study
title_full Efficacy and safety of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure patients: the LAICA study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure patients: the LAICA study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure patients: the LAICA study
title_short Efficacy and safety of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure patients: the LAICA study
title_sort efficacy and safety of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure patients: the laica study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13670
work_keys_str_mv AT garciagonzalezmartinj efficacyandsafetyofintermittentrepeatedlevosimendaninfusionsinadvancedheartfailurepatientsthelaicastudy
AT aldeaperonaana efficacyandsafetyofintermittentrepeatedlevosimendaninfusionsinadvancedheartfailurepatientsthelaicastudy
AT larapadronantonio efficacyandsafetyofintermittentrepeatedlevosimendaninfusionsinadvancedheartfailurepatientsthelaicastudy
AT moralesrulljoseluis efficacyandsafetyofintermittentrepeatedlevosimendaninfusionsinadvancedheartfailurepatientsthelaicastudy
AT martinezsellesmanuel efficacyandsafetyofintermittentrepeatedlevosimendaninfusionsinadvancedheartfailurepatientsthelaicastudy
AT demoramartinmanuel efficacyandsafetyofintermittentrepeatedlevosimendaninfusionsinadvancedheartfailurepatientsthelaicastudy
AT lopezdiazjavier efficacyandsafetyofintermittentrepeatedlevosimendaninfusionsinadvancedheartfailurepatientsthelaicastudy
AT lopezfernandezsilvia efficacyandsafetyofintermittentrepeatedlevosimendaninfusionsinadvancedheartfailurepatientsthelaicastudy
AT ortizoficialdeguipilar efficacyandsafetyofintermittentrepeatedlevosimendaninfusionsinadvancedheartfailurepatientsthelaicastudy
AT jimenezsosaalejandro efficacyandsafetyofintermittentrepeatedlevosimendaninfusionsinadvancedheartfailurepatientsthelaicastudy