Cargando…
Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
AIMS: There are conflicting data on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of permanent AF at device implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13599 |
_version_ | 1784623639695458304 |
---|---|
author | Rapacciuolo, Antonio Iacopino, Saverio D'Onofrio, Antonio Curnis, Antonio Pisanò, Ennio C. Biffi, Mauro Della Bella, Paolo Dello Russo, Antonio Caravati, Fabrizio Zanotto, Gabriele Calvi, Valeria Rovaris, Giovanni Senatore, Gaetano Nicolis, Daniele Santamaria, Matteo Giammaria, Massimo Maglia, Giampiero Duca, Antonio Ammirati, Giuseppe Romano, Salvo Andrea Piacenti, Marcello Celentano, Eduardo Bisignani, Giovanni Vaccaro, Paola Miracapillo, Gennaro Bertini, Matteo Nigro, Gerardo Giacopelli, Daniele Gargaro, Alessio Bisceglia, Caterina |
author_facet | Rapacciuolo, Antonio Iacopino, Saverio D'Onofrio, Antonio Curnis, Antonio Pisanò, Ennio C. Biffi, Mauro Della Bella, Paolo Dello Russo, Antonio Caravati, Fabrizio Zanotto, Gabriele Calvi, Valeria Rovaris, Giovanni Senatore, Gaetano Nicolis, Daniele Santamaria, Matteo Giammaria, Massimo Maglia, Giampiero Duca, Antonio Ammirati, Giuseppe Romano, Salvo Andrea Piacenti, Marcello Celentano, Eduardo Bisignani, Giovanni Vaccaro, Paola Miracapillo, Gennaro Bertini, Matteo Nigro, Gerardo Giacopelli, Daniele Gargaro, Alessio Bisceglia, Caterina |
author_sort | Rapacciuolo, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: There are conflicting data on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of permanent AF at device implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed remote monitoring data from 1141 CRT defibrillators. Propensity score with inverse‐probability weighting method was used to balance AF and sinus rhythm (SR) groups. Analysis endpoints included total mortality, appropriate defibrillation shocks, and CRT percentage. There were 229 patients (20.1%) in the AF group and 912 patients (79.9%) in the SR group. Compared with SR patients, AF patients were older (median age, 77 vs. 72 years, P < 0.001), more frequently male (82.5% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.02), and had higher heart rate (75.7 vs. 71.0 b.p.m., P < 0.001). Of the 229 AF patients, 162 (70.7%) received suboptimal CRT (<98%) and 67 (29.3%) had adequate CRT (≥98%). During a median follow‐up of 24 months, total mortality did not differ between AF and SR groups (propensity‐score‐weighted hazard ratio, HR 1.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.82–2.15], P = 0.25). The risk of appropriate shocks was significantly higher in the AF group with <98% CRT than in the SR group (weighted‐HR, 1.99 [1.21–3.26], P = 0.006) and was similar in the AF group with ≥98% CRT versus the SR group (1.29 [0.66–2.53], P = 0.45). During follow‐up, sinus rhythm was recovered in 23 patients in the AF group (10%) after a median time of 106 (42–256) days. The rate of sinus rhythm recovery in the AF group was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.8–6.7) per 100 patient‐years; the rate of permanent AF occurrence in the SR group was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.9–3.3) per 100 patient‐years. CONCLUSIONS: Although mortality was similar across patient groups, patients with permanent AF and suboptimal CRT had twofold higher risk of appropriate shocks than SR patients or AF patients with CRT ≥ 98%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8712818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87128182022-01-04 Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation Rapacciuolo, Antonio Iacopino, Saverio D'Onofrio, Antonio Curnis, Antonio Pisanò, Ennio C. Biffi, Mauro Della Bella, Paolo Dello Russo, Antonio Caravati, Fabrizio Zanotto, Gabriele Calvi, Valeria Rovaris, Giovanni Senatore, Gaetano Nicolis, Daniele Santamaria, Matteo Giammaria, Massimo Maglia, Giampiero Duca, Antonio Ammirati, Giuseppe Romano, Salvo Andrea Piacenti, Marcello Celentano, Eduardo Bisignani, Giovanni Vaccaro, Paola Miracapillo, Gennaro Bertini, Matteo Nigro, Gerardo Giacopelli, Daniele Gargaro, Alessio Bisceglia, Caterina ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: There are conflicting data on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of permanent AF at device implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed remote monitoring data from 1141 CRT defibrillators. Propensity score with inverse‐probability weighting method was used to balance AF and sinus rhythm (SR) groups. Analysis endpoints included total mortality, appropriate defibrillation shocks, and CRT percentage. There were 229 patients (20.1%) in the AF group and 912 patients (79.9%) in the SR group. Compared with SR patients, AF patients were older (median age, 77 vs. 72 years, P < 0.001), more frequently male (82.5% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.02), and had higher heart rate (75.7 vs. 71.0 b.p.m., P < 0.001). Of the 229 AF patients, 162 (70.7%) received suboptimal CRT (<98%) and 67 (29.3%) had adequate CRT (≥98%). During a median follow‐up of 24 months, total mortality did not differ between AF and SR groups (propensity‐score‐weighted hazard ratio, HR 1.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.82–2.15], P = 0.25). The risk of appropriate shocks was significantly higher in the AF group with <98% CRT than in the SR group (weighted‐HR, 1.99 [1.21–3.26], P = 0.006) and was similar in the AF group with ≥98% CRT versus the SR group (1.29 [0.66–2.53], P = 0.45). During follow‐up, sinus rhythm was recovered in 23 patients in the AF group (10%) after a median time of 106 (42–256) days. The rate of sinus rhythm recovery in the AF group was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.8–6.7) per 100 patient‐years; the rate of permanent AF occurrence in the SR group was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.9–3.3) per 100 patient‐years. CONCLUSIONS: Although mortality was similar across patient groups, patients with permanent AF and suboptimal CRT had twofold higher risk of appropriate shocks than SR patients or AF patients with CRT ≥ 98%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8712818/ /pubmed/34514741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13599 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rapacciuolo, Antonio Iacopino, Saverio D'Onofrio, Antonio Curnis, Antonio Pisanò, Ennio C. Biffi, Mauro Della Bella, Paolo Dello Russo, Antonio Caravati, Fabrizio Zanotto, Gabriele Calvi, Valeria Rovaris, Giovanni Senatore, Gaetano Nicolis, Daniele Santamaria, Matteo Giammaria, Massimo Maglia, Giampiero Duca, Antonio Ammirati, Giuseppe Romano, Salvo Andrea Piacenti, Marcello Celentano, Eduardo Bisignani, Giovanni Vaccaro, Paola Miracapillo, Gennaro Bertini, Matteo Nigro, Gerardo Giacopelli, Daniele Gargaro, Alessio Bisceglia, Caterina Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation |
title | Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation |
title_full | Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation |
title_fullStr | Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation |
title_short | Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation |
title_sort | cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rapacciuoloantonio cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT iacopinosaverio cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT donofrioantonio cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT curnisantonio cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT pisanoennioc cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT biffimauro cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT dellabellapaolo cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT dellorussoantonio cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT caravatifabrizio cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT zanottogabriele cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT calvivaleria cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT rovarisgiovanni cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT senatoregaetano cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT nicolisdaniele cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT santamariamatteo cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT giammariamassimo cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT magliagiampiero cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT ducaantonio cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT ammiratigiuseppe cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT romanosalvoandrea cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT piacentimarcello cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT celentanoeduardo cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT bisignanigiovanni cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT vaccaropaola cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT miracapillogennaro cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT bertinimatteo cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT nigrogerardo cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT giacopellidaniele cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT gargaroalessio cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation AT biscegliacaterina cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation |