Cargando…

Functional, oncological outcomes and safety of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma with high anatomical complexity: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching method

BACKGROUND: Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is widely applied for small renal masses. However, the indication of NSS in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with high anatomical complexity is controversial. Thus, we compare functional and oncological outcomes, and safety of NSS versus ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xuanyu, Su, Zhonghua, Lv, Peng, Liu, Zeqi, Bai, Song
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051622
_version_ 1784623678534713344
author Zhang, Xuanyu
Su, Zhonghua
Lv, Peng
Liu, Zeqi
Bai, Song
author_facet Zhang, Xuanyu
Su, Zhonghua
Lv, Peng
Liu, Zeqi
Bai, Song
author_sort Zhang, Xuanyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is widely applied for small renal masses. However, the indication of NSS in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with high anatomical complexity is controversial. Thus, we compare functional and oncological outcomes, and safety of NSS versus radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with localised RCC with high anatomical complexity Radius, Exophytic/endophytic, Nearness, Anterior/posterior, Location. (R.E.N.A.L.) score ≥10. METHODS: We evaluated 575 patients with localised RCC that underwent NSS or RN at our centre between January 2013 and December 2018. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, tumour data, surgery procedure, perioperative data and survival data were recorded. After propensity score matching, the variables were compared by binary paired logistic regression. The change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was compared with covariance analysis adjusted for baseline value. Recurrence and survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: In the matched group, NSS showed lower eGFR loss compared with the RN group (17.81 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs 28.28 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p<0.001). Moreover, the recurrence-free survival (p=0.002), cardiocerebrovascular disease-specific survival (p=0.015) and overall survival (p=0.017) of patients with NSS were better than those that underwent RN. Cancer-specific survival in both groups showed no difference (p=0.323). The incidence of minor and major complications in the two groups showed no difference (p=0.144, p=0.108). CONCLUSION: NSS resulted in better preservation of renal function and oncological outcomes compared with RN, with acceptable complications. These findings could help improve clinical decision making for patients with localised RCC with high anatomical complexity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000040652.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8712983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87129832022-01-11 Functional, oncological outcomes and safety of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma with high anatomical complexity: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching method Zhang, Xuanyu Su, Zhonghua Lv, Peng Liu, Zeqi Bai, Song BMJ Open Urology BACKGROUND: Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is widely applied for small renal masses. However, the indication of NSS in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with high anatomical complexity is controversial. Thus, we compare functional and oncological outcomes, and safety of NSS versus radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with localised RCC with high anatomical complexity Radius, Exophytic/endophytic, Nearness, Anterior/posterior, Location. (R.E.N.A.L.) score ≥10. METHODS: We evaluated 575 patients with localised RCC that underwent NSS or RN at our centre between January 2013 and December 2018. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, tumour data, surgery procedure, perioperative data and survival data were recorded. After propensity score matching, the variables were compared by binary paired logistic regression. The change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was compared with covariance analysis adjusted for baseline value. Recurrence and survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: In the matched group, NSS showed lower eGFR loss compared with the RN group (17.81 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs 28.28 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p<0.001). Moreover, the recurrence-free survival (p=0.002), cardiocerebrovascular disease-specific survival (p=0.015) and overall survival (p=0.017) of patients with NSS were better than those that underwent RN. Cancer-specific survival in both groups showed no difference (p=0.323). The incidence of minor and major complications in the two groups showed no difference (p=0.144, p=0.108). CONCLUSION: NSS resulted in better preservation of renal function and oncological outcomes compared with RN, with acceptable complications. These findings could help improve clinical decision making for patients with localised RCC with high anatomical complexity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000040652. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8712983/ /pubmed/34952876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051622 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Urology
Zhang, Xuanyu
Su, Zhonghua
Lv, Peng
Liu, Zeqi
Bai, Song
Functional, oncological outcomes and safety of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma with high anatomical complexity: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching method
title Functional, oncological outcomes and safety of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma with high anatomical complexity: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching method
title_full Functional, oncological outcomes and safety of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma with high anatomical complexity: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching method
title_fullStr Functional, oncological outcomes and safety of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma with high anatomical complexity: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching method
title_full_unstemmed Functional, oncological outcomes and safety of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma with high anatomical complexity: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching method
title_short Functional, oncological outcomes and safety of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma with high anatomical complexity: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching method
title_sort functional, oncological outcomes and safety of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma with high anatomical complexity: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching method
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051622
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxuanyu functionaloncologicaloutcomesandsafetyofnephronsparingsurgeryversusradicalnephrectomyinpatientswithlocalisedrenalcellcarcinomawithhighanatomicalcomplexityaretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematchingmethod
AT suzhonghua functionaloncologicaloutcomesandsafetyofnephronsparingsurgeryversusradicalnephrectomyinpatientswithlocalisedrenalcellcarcinomawithhighanatomicalcomplexityaretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematchingmethod
AT lvpeng functionaloncologicaloutcomesandsafetyofnephronsparingsurgeryversusradicalnephrectomyinpatientswithlocalisedrenalcellcarcinomawithhighanatomicalcomplexityaretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematchingmethod
AT liuzeqi functionaloncologicaloutcomesandsafetyofnephronsparingsurgeryversusradicalnephrectomyinpatientswithlocalisedrenalcellcarcinomawithhighanatomicalcomplexityaretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematchingmethod
AT baisong functionaloncologicaloutcomesandsafetyofnephronsparingsurgeryversusradicalnephrectomyinpatientswithlocalisedrenalcellcarcinomawithhighanatomicalcomplexityaretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematchingmethod