Cargando…

Telemedicine Use and Satisfaction Among Radiation Oncologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Current Trends and Future Opportunities

PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine became an attractive alternative to in-person appointments. The role of telemedicine in patients who undergo frequent on-site treatment, such as radiation therapy, is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine telemedicine use, physician sat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damico, Nicholas J., Deshane, Alok, Kharouta, Michael, Wu, Anna, Wang, Gi-Ming, Machtay, Mitchell X., Kumar, Aryavarta, Choi, Serah, Bhatt, Aashish D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8713057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34993359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100835
_version_ 1784623693599604736
author Damico, Nicholas J.
Deshane, Alok
Kharouta, Michael
Wu, Anna
Wang, Gi-Ming
Machtay, Mitchell X.
Kumar, Aryavarta
Choi, Serah
Bhatt, Aashish D.
author_facet Damico, Nicholas J.
Deshane, Alok
Kharouta, Michael
Wu, Anna
Wang, Gi-Ming
Machtay, Mitchell X.
Kumar, Aryavarta
Choi, Serah
Bhatt, Aashish D.
author_sort Damico, Nicholas J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine became an attractive alternative to in-person appointments. The role of telemedicine in patients who undergo frequent on-site treatment, such as radiation therapy, is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine telemedicine use, physician satisfaction, and barriers to continued use in radiation oncology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous, electronic survey was distributed to radiation oncologists internationally between June and October 2020. Respondents described demographic and practice characteristics, and a 5-point Likert scale assessed provider satisfaction, ease of use, and overall utility of telemedicine. Analyses include descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons using the χ(2) test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The response rate was 4.3%. Two hundred thirty-two respondents completed the survey, 63.8% of whom were male, 52.6% aged 50 or younger, and 78.0% from the United States. Only 14.2% used telemedicine previously, which increased to 93.1% during COVID-19. Among all telemedicine users, usage rates were 77.9% for initial consultations, 97.2% for follow-up visits, and 35.9% for on-treatment visits. Of the respondents, 69.8% reported that <25% of patients requiring treatment experienced delays due to COVID-19. Most conducted appointments from the workplace, with 40.1% also doing so from home. Satisfaction was high at 73.8%, perceived usefulness was 76.9%, and 81.5% hope to continue using telemedicine after the pandemic. However, 82.4% had concerns with the inability to examine patients and 63.0% had concerns about poor patient access to the required technology. In addition, 49.5% had concerns regarding continued billing/reimbursement, less commonly at government centers (18.8%) compared with academic/satellite facilities (52.7%) and free-standing centers/community hospitals (50.7%, P = .039 for both comparisons). These concerns were also significantly higher among US physicians (53.2% vs 34.9%, P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Widespread adoption of telemedicine by radiation oncologists occurred during COVID-19 with high rates of satisfaction and interest in continued use. Sustained reimbursement for telemedicine services is a significant concern, particularly in the United States and outside of government facilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8713057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87130572022-01-05 Telemedicine Use and Satisfaction Among Radiation Oncologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Current Trends and Future Opportunities Damico, Nicholas J. Deshane, Alok Kharouta, Michael Wu, Anna Wang, Gi-Ming Machtay, Mitchell X. Kumar, Aryavarta Choi, Serah Bhatt, Aashish D. Adv Radiat Oncol Research Letter PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine became an attractive alternative to in-person appointments. The role of telemedicine in patients who undergo frequent on-site treatment, such as radiation therapy, is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine telemedicine use, physician satisfaction, and barriers to continued use in radiation oncology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous, electronic survey was distributed to radiation oncologists internationally between June and October 2020. Respondents described demographic and practice characteristics, and a 5-point Likert scale assessed provider satisfaction, ease of use, and overall utility of telemedicine. Analyses include descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons using the χ(2) test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The response rate was 4.3%. Two hundred thirty-two respondents completed the survey, 63.8% of whom were male, 52.6% aged 50 or younger, and 78.0% from the United States. Only 14.2% used telemedicine previously, which increased to 93.1% during COVID-19. Among all telemedicine users, usage rates were 77.9% for initial consultations, 97.2% for follow-up visits, and 35.9% for on-treatment visits. Of the respondents, 69.8% reported that <25% of patients requiring treatment experienced delays due to COVID-19. Most conducted appointments from the workplace, with 40.1% also doing so from home. Satisfaction was high at 73.8%, perceived usefulness was 76.9%, and 81.5% hope to continue using telemedicine after the pandemic. However, 82.4% had concerns with the inability to examine patients and 63.0% had concerns about poor patient access to the required technology. In addition, 49.5% had concerns regarding continued billing/reimbursement, less commonly at government centers (18.8%) compared with academic/satellite facilities (52.7%) and free-standing centers/community hospitals (50.7%, P = .039 for both comparisons). These concerns were also significantly higher among US physicians (53.2% vs 34.9%, P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Widespread adoption of telemedicine by radiation oncologists occurred during COVID-19 with high rates of satisfaction and interest in continued use. Sustained reimbursement for telemedicine services is a significant concern, particularly in the United States and outside of government facilities. Elsevier 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8713057/ /pubmed/34993359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100835 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Letter
Damico, Nicholas J.
Deshane, Alok
Kharouta, Michael
Wu, Anna
Wang, Gi-Ming
Machtay, Mitchell X.
Kumar, Aryavarta
Choi, Serah
Bhatt, Aashish D.
Telemedicine Use and Satisfaction Among Radiation Oncologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Current Trends and Future Opportunities
title Telemedicine Use and Satisfaction Among Radiation Oncologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Current Trends and Future Opportunities
title_full Telemedicine Use and Satisfaction Among Radiation Oncologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Current Trends and Future Opportunities
title_fullStr Telemedicine Use and Satisfaction Among Radiation Oncologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Current Trends and Future Opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine Use and Satisfaction Among Radiation Oncologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Current Trends and Future Opportunities
title_short Telemedicine Use and Satisfaction Among Radiation Oncologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Current Trends and Future Opportunities
title_sort telemedicine use and satisfaction among radiation oncologists during the covid-19 pandemic: evaluation of current trends and future opportunities
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8713057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34993359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100835
work_keys_str_mv AT damiconicholasj telemedicineuseandsatisfactionamongradiationoncologistsduringthecovid19pandemicevaluationofcurrenttrendsandfutureopportunities
AT deshanealok telemedicineuseandsatisfactionamongradiationoncologistsduringthecovid19pandemicevaluationofcurrenttrendsandfutureopportunities
AT kharoutamichael telemedicineuseandsatisfactionamongradiationoncologistsduringthecovid19pandemicevaluationofcurrenttrendsandfutureopportunities
AT wuanna telemedicineuseandsatisfactionamongradiationoncologistsduringthecovid19pandemicevaluationofcurrenttrendsandfutureopportunities
AT wanggiming telemedicineuseandsatisfactionamongradiationoncologistsduringthecovid19pandemicevaluationofcurrenttrendsandfutureopportunities
AT machtaymitchellx telemedicineuseandsatisfactionamongradiationoncologistsduringthecovid19pandemicevaluationofcurrenttrendsandfutureopportunities
AT kumararyavarta telemedicineuseandsatisfactionamongradiationoncologistsduringthecovid19pandemicevaluationofcurrenttrendsandfutureopportunities
AT choiserah telemedicineuseandsatisfactionamongradiationoncologistsduringthecovid19pandemicevaluationofcurrenttrendsandfutureopportunities
AT bhattaashishd telemedicineuseandsatisfactionamongradiationoncologistsduringthecovid19pandemicevaluationofcurrenttrendsandfutureopportunities