Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of filling in endodontically treated root canals using the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups that were assigned b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo, Mayta-Tovalino, Frank, Lúcar-Flores, Cecilia, Mendoza, Roman, Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel, Guillen-Galarza, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8713498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35036377
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_113_21
_version_ 1784623776004046848
author Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
Lúcar-Flores, Cecilia
Mendoza, Roman
Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel
Guillen-Galarza, Carlos
author_facet Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
Lúcar-Flores, Cecilia
Mendoza, Roman
Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel
Guillen-Galarza, Carlos
author_sort Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of filling in endodontically treated root canals using the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups that were assigned by simple randomization according to the filling technique. Once the endodontic treatment was performed, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the quality according to the radiographic density and tomography was taken to evaluate the quality according to the tomographic volume of spaces, compared with the post-preparation biomechanical tomography. Finally, we performed a statistical analysis (Student’s t-test) to evaluate whether there were differences between the types of filling. RESULTS: Radiographic radiodensity was 182.89 ± 9.81 and 186.72 ± 6.97 HU for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. The void volume was 3.75 ± 2.35 and 2.43 ± 1.18 mm(3) for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found between the techniques for both filling quality parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8713498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87134982022-01-14 A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo Mayta-Tovalino, Frank Lúcar-Flores, Cecilia Mendoza, Roman Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel Guillen-Galarza, Carlos J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of filling in endodontically treated root canals using the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups that were assigned by simple randomization according to the filling technique. Once the endodontic treatment was performed, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the quality according to the radiographic density and tomography was taken to evaluate the quality according to the tomographic volume of spaces, compared with the post-preparation biomechanical tomography. Finally, we performed a statistical analysis (Student’s t-test) to evaluate whether there were differences between the types of filling. RESULTS: Radiographic radiodensity was 182.89 ± 9.81 and 186.72 ± 6.97 HU for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. The void volume was 3.75 ± 2.35 and 2.43 ± 1.18 mm(3) for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found between the techniques for both filling quality parameters. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8713498/ /pubmed/35036377 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_113_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
Lúcar-Flores, Cecilia
Mendoza, Roman
Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel
Guillen-Galarza, Carlos
A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of endodontically treated root canals obturated using gutta-percha with two different protocols: an in-vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8713498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35036377
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_113_21
work_keys_str_mv AT munivedegregoriarnaldo acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT maytatovalinofrank acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT lucarflorescecilia acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT mendozaroman acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT alviteztemochedaniel acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT guillengalarzacarlos acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT munivedegregoriarnaldo comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT maytatovalinofrank comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT lucarflorescecilia comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT mendozaroman comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT alviteztemochedaniel comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy
AT guillengalarzacarlos comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy