Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of filling in endodontically treated root canals using the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups that were assigned b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8713498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35036377 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_113_21 |
_version_ | 1784623776004046848 |
---|---|
author | Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo Mayta-Tovalino, Frank Lúcar-Flores, Cecilia Mendoza, Roman Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel Guillen-Galarza, Carlos |
author_facet | Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo Mayta-Tovalino, Frank Lúcar-Flores, Cecilia Mendoza, Roman Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel Guillen-Galarza, Carlos |
author_sort | Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of filling in endodontically treated root canals using the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups that were assigned by simple randomization according to the filling technique. Once the endodontic treatment was performed, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the quality according to the radiographic density and tomography was taken to evaluate the quality according to the tomographic volume of spaces, compared with the post-preparation biomechanical tomography. Finally, we performed a statistical analysis (Student’s t-test) to evaluate whether there were differences between the types of filling. RESULTS: Radiographic radiodensity was 182.89 ± 9.81 and 186.72 ± 6.97 HU for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. The void volume was 3.75 ± 2.35 and 2.43 ± 1.18 mm(3) for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found between the techniques for both filling quality parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8713498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87134982022-01-14 A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo Mayta-Tovalino, Frank Lúcar-Flores, Cecilia Mendoza, Roman Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel Guillen-Galarza, Carlos J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of filling in endodontically treated root canals using the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups that were assigned by simple randomization according to the filling technique. Once the endodontic treatment was performed, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the quality according to the radiographic density and tomography was taken to evaluate the quality according to the tomographic volume of spaces, compared with the post-preparation biomechanical tomography. Finally, we performed a statistical analysis (Student’s t-test) to evaluate whether there were differences between the types of filling. RESULTS: Radiographic radiodensity was 182.89 ± 9.81 and 186.72 ± 6.97 HU for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. The void volume was 3.75 ± 2.35 and 2.43 ± 1.18 mm(3) for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found between the techniques for both filling quality parameters. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8713498/ /pubmed/35036377 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_113_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo Mayta-Tovalino, Frank Lúcar-Flores, Cecilia Mendoza, Roman Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel Guillen-Galarza, Carlos A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-percha with Two Different Protocols: An In-vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of endodontically treated root canals obturated using gutta-percha with two different protocols: an in-vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8713498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35036377 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_113_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munivedegregoriarnaldo acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT maytatovalinofrank acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT lucarflorescecilia acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT mendozaroman acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT alviteztemochedaniel acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT guillengalarzacarlos acomparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT munivedegregoriarnaldo comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT maytatovalinofrank comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT lucarflorescecilia comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT mendozaroman comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT alviteztemochedaniel comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy AT guillengalarzacarlos comparativeevaluationofendodonticallytreatedrootcanalsobturatedusingguttaperchawithtwodifferentprotocolsaninvitrostudy |