Cargando…
Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm
The aim of this study was to examine whether positive and negative mood states affect auditory distraction in a serial-recall task. The duplex-mechanism account differentiates two types of auditory distraction. The changing-state effect is postulated to be rooted in interference-by-process and to be...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260699 |
_version_ | 1784623846852132864 |
---|---|
author | Kaiser, Saskia Buchner, Axel Bell, Raoul |
author_facet | Kaiser, Saskia Buchner, Axel Bell, Raoul |
author_sort | Kaiser, Saskia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to examine whether positive and negative mood states affect auditory distraction in a serial-recall task. The duplex-mechanism account differentiates two types of auditory distraction. The changing-state effect is postulated to be rooted in interference-by-process and to be automatic. The auditory-deviant effect is attributed to attentional capture by the deviant distractors. Only the auditory-deviant effect, but not the changing-state effect, should be influenced by emotional mood states according to the duplex-mechanism account. Four experiments were conducted to test how auditory distraction is affected by emotional mood states. Mood was induced by autobiographical recall (Experiments 1 and 2) or the presentation of emotional pictures (Experiments 3 and 4). Even though the manipulations were successful in inducing changes in mood, neither positive mood (Experiments 1 and 3) nor negative mood (Experiments 2 and 4) had any effect on distraction despite large samples sizes (N = 851 in total). The results thus are not in line with the hypothesis that auditory distraction is affected by changes in mood state. The results support an automatic-capture account according to which the auditory-deviant effect and the changing-state effect are mainly stimulus-driven effects that are rooted in the automatic processing of the to-be-ignored auditory stream. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8714099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87140992021-12-29 Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm Kaiser, Saskia Buchner, Axel Bell, Raoul PLoS One Research Article The aim of this study was to examine whether positive and negative mood states affect auditory distraction in a serial-recall task. The duplex-mechanism account differentiates two types of auditory distraction. The changing-state effect is postulated to be rooted in interference-by-process and to be automatic. The auditory-deviant effect is attributed to attentional capture by the deviant distractors. Only the auditory-deviant effect, but not the changing-state effect, should be influenced by emotional mood states according to the duplex-mechanism account. Four experiments were conducted to test how auditory distraction is affected by emotional mood states. Mood was induced by autobiographical recall (Experiments 1 and 2) or the presentation of emotional pictures (Experiments 3 and 4). Even though the manipulations were successful in inducing changes in mood, neither positive mood (Experiments 1 and 3) nor negative mood (Experiments 2 and 4) had any effect on distraction despite large samples sizes (N = 851 in total). The results thus are not in line with the hypothesis that auditory distraction is affected by changes in mood state. The results support an automatic-capture account according to which the auditory-deviant effect and the changing-state effect are mainly stimulus-driven effects that are rooted in the automatic processing of the to-be-ignored auditory stream. Public Library of Science 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8714099/ /pubmed/34962933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260699 Text en © 2021 Kaiser et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaiser, Saskia Buchner, Axel Bell, Raoul Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm |
title | Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm |
title_full | Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm |
title_fullStr | Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm |
title_short | Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm |
title_sort | positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaisersaskia positiveandnegativemoodstatesdonotinfluencecrossmodalauditorydistractionintheserialrecallparadigm AT buchneraxel positiveandnegativemoodstatesdonotinfluencecrossmodalauditorydistractionintheserialrecallparadigm AT bellraoul positiveandnegativemoodstatesdonotinfluencecrossmodalauditorydistractionintheserialrecallparadigm |