Cargando…

Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of different types of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions and were published as origina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonzales-Huaman, Patricia, Fernandez-Chinguel, Jose Ernesto, Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260794
_version_ 1784623848277147648
author Gonzales-Huaman, Patricia
Fernandez-Chinguel, Jose Ernesto
Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
author_facet Gonzales-Huaman, Patricia
Fernandez-Chinguel, Jose Ernesto
Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
author_sort Gonzales-Huaman, Patricia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of different types of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions and were published as original papers in scientific journals. The literature search was performed in June 2021 in PubMed, Central Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Google Scholar; without restrictions in language or publication date. Two independent authors identified studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Whenever possible, meta-analyses were performed. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354). RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were eligible for inclusion (published from 2004 to 2017), from which nine compared enhanced versus standard counseling. Pooled estimates showed that, compared to standard counseling, enhanced counseling was associated with a higher incidence of effective contraceptive use (>3 months) (relative risk [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–1.16), although no significant difference was found in the incidence of long-acting reversible contraceptive use (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.68–2.29), contraceptive uptake (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98–1.15), and obstetric event occurrence (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.57–1.47). Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. In addition, two studies compared contraceptive counseling provided by physicians versus that provided by non-physicians, which did not show significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced contraceptive counseling may favor effective contraceptive use but may not affect the rate of obstetric event occurrence. Also, the studies did not find a difference in the effects of counseling interventions given by different providers. Since evidence certainty was very low, future well-designed RCTs are needed to make informed decisions. REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8714105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87141052021-12-29 Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials Gonzales-Huaman, Patricia Fernandez-Chinguel, Jose Ernesto Taype-Rondan, Alvaro PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of different types of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions and were published as original papers in scientific journals. The literature search was performed in June 2021 in PubMed, Central Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Google Scholar; without restrictions in language or publication date. Two independent authors identified studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Whenever possible, meta-analyses were performed. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354). RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were eligible for inclusion (published from 2004 to 2017), from which nine compared enhanced versus standard counseling. Pooled estimates showed that, compared to standard counseling, enhanced counseling was associated with a higher incidence of effective contraceptive use (>3 months) (relative risk [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–1.16), although no significant difference was found in the incidence of long-acting reversible contraceptive use (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.68–2.29), contraceptive uptake (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98–1.15), and obstetric event occurrence (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.57–1.47). Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. In addition, two studies compared contraceptive counseling provided by physicians versus that provided by non-physicians, which did not show significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced contraceptive counseling may favor effective contraceptive use but may not affect the rate of obstetric event occurrence. Also, the studies did not find a difference in the effects of counseling interventions given by different providers. Since evidence certainty was very low, future well-designed RCTs are needed to make informed decisions. REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354). Public Library of Science 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8714105/ /pubmed/34962913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260794 Text en © 2021 Gonzales-Huaman et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gonzales-Huaman, Patricia
Fernandez-Chinguel, Jose Ernesto
Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_short Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_sort peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260794
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzaleshuamanpatricia periabortioncontraceptivecounselingasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fernandezchingueljoseernesto periabortioncontraceptivecounselingasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tayperondanalvaro periabortioncontraceptivecounselingasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials