Cargando…

Dermatology residency research policies: A 2021 national survey

BACKGROUND: In this follow-up study to previous work, the authors survey the availability of key measures and resources pertaining to residency research in U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited dermatology residency programs, including potential policy changes followin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anand, Pratibha, Szeto, Mindy D., Flaten, Hania, D'Angelo, Josephine, Dunnick, Cory A., Dellavalle, Robert P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2021.05.003
_version_ 1784623936303005696
author Anand, Pratibha
Szeto, Mindy D.
Flaten, Hania
D'Angelo, Josephine
Dunnick, Cory A.
Dellavalle, Robert P.
author_facet Anand, Pratibha
Szeto, Mindy D.
Flaten, Hania
D'Angelo, Josephine
Dunnick, Cory A.
Dellavalle, Robert P.
author_sort Anand, Pratibha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this follow-up study to previous work, the authors survey the availability of key measures and resources pertaining to residency research in U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited dermatology residency programs, including potential policy changes following the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The chief objective of this survey was to evaluate and compare dermatology programs’ resident research requirements and guidelines. METHODS: This cross-sectional study employed a 13-item survey administered online in early 2021 to assess the degree to which dermatology residency programs require and support their new physician graduates in scholarly research endeavors. RESULTS: A total of 32 program directors representing 30 dermatology residency programs (30 of 138 accredited programs contacted [22%]) responded to the survey. Almost all programs described quality improvement project requirements for residents and were able to provide funding for resident conference participation. Most programs also reported resident publication requirements and the availability of research electives. However, the vast majority did not have required research rotations or a formal mentorship program. The COVID-19 pandemic did not have a substantial impact on residency research requirements. CONCLUSION: Our survey provides objective data about the current dermatology resident research requirements across the United States. These findings may prove valuable to prospective applicants, residency programs, and accrediting agencies in improving, advancing, and structuring dermatology residency guidelines and resources with the aim of encouraging new physician trainees to pursue research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8714577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87145772022-01-12 Dermatology residency research policies: A 2021 national survey Anand, Pratibha Szeto, Mindy D. Flaten, Hania D'Angelo, Josephine Dunnick, Cory A. Dellavalle, Robert P. Int J Womens Dermatol Original Research BACKGROUND: In this follow-up study to previous work, the authors survey the availability of key measures and resources pertaining to residency research in U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited dermatology residency programs, including potential policy changes following the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The chief objective of this survey was to evaluate and compare dermatology programs’ resident research requirements and guidelines. METHODS: This cross-sectional study employed a 13-item survey administered online in early 2021 to assess the degree to which dermatology residency programs require and support their new physician graduates in scholarly research endeavors. RESULTS: A total of 32 program directors representing 30 dermatology residency programs (30 of 138 accredited programs contacted [22%]) responded to the survey. Almost all programs described quality improvement project requirements for residents and were able to provide funding for resident conference participation. Most programs also reported resident publication requirements and the availability of research electives. However, the vast majority did not have required research rotations or a formal mentorship program. The COVID-19 pandemic did not have a substantial impact on residency research requirements. CONCLUSION: Our survey provides objective data about the current dermatology resident research requirements across the United States. These findings may prove valuable to prospective applicants, residency programs, and accrediting agencies in improving, advancing, and structuring dermatology residency guidelines and resources with the aim of encouraging new physician trainees to pursue research. Elsevier 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8714577/ /pubmed/35028383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2021.05.003 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Women's Dermatologic Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Anand, Pratibha
Szeto, Mindy D.
Flaten, Hania
D'Angelo, Josephine
Dunnick, Cory A.
Dellavalle, Robert P.
Dermatology residency research policies: A 2021 national survey
title Dermatology residency research policies: A 2021 national survey
title_full Dermatology residency research policies: A 2021 national survey
title_fullStr Dermatology residency research policies: A 2021 national survey
title_full_unstemmed Dermatology residency research policies: A 2021 national survey
title_short Dermatology residency research policies: A 2021 national survey
title_sort dermatology residency research policies: a 2021 national survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2021.05.003
work_keys_str_mv AT anandpratibha dermatologyresidencyresearchpoliciesa2021nationalsurvey
AT szetomindyd dermatologyresidencyresearchpoliciesa2021nationalsurvey
AT flatenhania dermatologyresidencyresearchpoliciesa2021nationalsurvey
AT dangelojosephine dermatologyresidencyresearchpoliciesa2021nationalsurvey
AT dunnickcorya dermatologyresidencyresearchpoliciesa2021nationalsurvey
AT dellavallerobertp dermatologyresidencyresearchpoliciesa2021nationalsurvey