Cargando…

Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries

Background and Purpose: Premedication with either oral midazolam or intranasal dexmedetomidine prior to surgery remains less than ideal. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of those two drug regimens would have any beneficial effects on the preoperative sedation and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Yu-Hang, Wang, Cheng-Yu, Li, Yang, Chen, Jia, Li, Jun, Wu, Junzheng, Liu, Hua-Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34975463
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.648699
_version_ 1784624034091106304
author Cai, Yu-Hang
Wang, Cheng-Yu
Li, Yang
Chen, Jia
Li, Jun
Wu, Junzheng
Liu, Hua-Cheng
author_facet Cai, Yu-Hang
Wang, Cheng-Yu
Li, Yang
Chen, Jia
Li, Jun
Wu, Junzheng
Liu, Hua-Cheng
author_sort Cai, Yu-Hang
collection PubMed
description Background and Purpose: Premedication with either oral midazolam or intranasal dexmedetomidine prior to surgery remains less than ideal. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of those two drug regimens would have any beneficial effects on the preoperative sedation and the children’s compliance during anesthesia inhalation induction. Experimental Approach: One hundred thirty-eight children aged 2–6 years were randomly allocated into three groups: Group M with oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg(−1), Group D with intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 μg kg(−1), and Group M + D with intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg kg(−1) plus oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg(−1). The primary outcome was the children’s compliance during inhalation induction with sevoflurane. The secondary outcomes included the preoperative sedative effects, behavior scores, parental separation anxiety scores, and the postoperative incidence of emergence agitation and recovery time. Results: Subjects in Group M + D showed higher satisfaction scores of compliance (p = 0.0049) and mask acceptance (MAS) (p = 0.0049) during anesthesia inhalation induction. Subjects in Group M + D had a significantly shorter time than those in Groups M and D to achieve the desired sedation level (p < 0.001) and remained at a higher sedation score in the holding area and up to the anesthesia induction after drug administration (p < 0.001). Conclusion and Implications: We conclude that pediatric patients premedicated with intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg kg(−1) plus oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg(−1) had significantly improved anesthesia induction compliance, and quicker onset to achieve and maintain a satisfactory level of sedation than those premedicated separately with two drugs. Therefore, the combined premed regimen is a greater choice when we are expecting a higher quality of sedation and a smoother anesthesia induction in children undergoing the surgeries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8714926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87149262021-12-30 Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries Cai, Yu-Hang Wang, Cheng-Yu Li, Yang Chen, Jia Li, Jun Wu, Junzheng Liu, Hua-Cheng Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background and Purpose: Premedication with either oral midazolam or intranasal dexmedetomidine prior to surgery remains less than ideal. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of those two drug regimens would have any beneficial effects on the preoperative sedation and the children’s compliance during anesthesia inhalation induction. Experimental Approach: One hundred thirty-eight children aged 2–6 years were randomly allocated into three groups: Group M with oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg(−1), Group D with intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 μg kg(−1), and Group M + D with intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg kg(−1) plus oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg(−1). The primary outcome was the children’s compliance during inhalation induction with sevoflurane. The secondary outcomes included the preoperative sedative effects, behavior scores, parental separation anxiety scores, and the postoperative incidence of emergence agitation and recovery time. Results: Subjects in Group M + D showed higher satisfaction scores of compliance (p = 0.0049) and mask acceptance (MAS) (p = 0.0049) during anesthesia inhalation induction. Subjects in Group M + D had a significantly shorter time than those in Groups M and D to achieve the desired sedation level (p < 0.001) and remained at a higher sedation score in the holding area and up to the anesthesia induction after drug administration (p < 0.001). Conclusion and Implications: We conclude that pediatric patients premedicated with intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg kg(−1) plus oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg(−1) had significantly improved anesthesia induction compliance, and quicker onset to achieve and maintain a satisfactory level of sedation than those premedicated separately with two drugs. Therefore, the combined premed regimen is a greater choice when we are expecting a higher quality of sedation and a smoother anesthesia induction in children undergoing the surgeries. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8714926/ /pubmed/34975463 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.648699 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cai, Wang, Li, Chen, Li, Wu and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Cai, Yu-Hang
Wang, Cheng-Yu
Li, Yang
Chen, Jia
Li, Jun
Wu, Junzheng
Liu, Hua-Cheng
Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries
title Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries
title_full Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries
title_fullStr Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries
title_short Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries
title_sort comparison of the effects of oral midazolam and intranasal dexmedetomidine on preoperative sedation and anesthesia induction in children undergoing surgeries
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34975463
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.648699
work_keys_str_mv AT caiyuhang comparisonoftheeffectsoforalmidazolamandintranasaldexmedetomidineonpreoperativesedationandanesthesiainductioninchildrenundergoingsurgeries
AT wangchengyu comparisonoftheeffectsoforalmidazolamandintranasaldexmedetomidineonpreoperativesedationandanesthesiainductioninchildrenundergoingsurgeries
AT liyang comparisonoftheeffectsoforalmidazolamandintranasaldexmedetomidineonpreoperativesedationandanesthesiainductioninchildrenundergoingsurgeries
AT chenjia comparisonoftheeffectsoforalmidazolamandintranasaldexmedetomidineonpreoperativesedationandanesthesiainductioninchildrenundergoingsurgeries
AT lijun comparisonoftheeffectsoforalmidazolamandintranasaldexmedetomidineonpreoperativesedationandanesthesiainductioninchildrenundergoingsurgeries
AT wujunzheng comparisonoftheeffectsoforalmidazolamandintranasaldexmedetomidineonpreoperativesedationandanesthesiainductioninchildrenundergoingsurgeries
AT liuhuacheng comparisonoftheeffectsoforalmidazolamandintranasaldexmedetomidineonpreoperativesedationandanesthesiainductioninchildrenundergoingsurgeries