Cargando…
Towards an ecological definition of sepsis: a viewpoint
In critically ill patients with sepsis, there is a grave lack of effective treatment options to address the illness-defining inappropriate host response. Currently, treatment is limited to source control and supportive care, albeit with imminent approval of immune modulating drugs for COVID-19-assoc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-021-00427-2 |
_version_ | 1784624121435389952 |
---|---|
author | Bauer, Michael Shankar-Hari, Manu Thomas-Rüddel, Daniel O. Wetzker, Reinhard |
author_facet | Bauer, Michael Shankar-Hari, Manu Thomas-Rüddel, Daniel O. Wetzker, Reinhard |
author_sort | Bauer, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | In critically ill patients with sepsis, there is a grave lack of effective treatment options to address the illness-defining inappropriate host response. Currently, treatment is limited to source control and supportive care, albeit with imminent approval of immune modulating drugs for COVID-19-associated lung failure the potential of host-directed strategies appears on the horizon. We suggest expanding the concept of sepsis by incorporating infectious stress within the general stress response of the cell to define sepsis as an illness state characterized by allostatic overload and failing adaptive responses along with biotic (pathogen) and abiotic (e.g., malnutrition) environmental stress factors. This would allow conceptualizing the failing organismic responses to pathogens in sepsis with an ancient response pattern depending on the energy state of cells and organs towards other environmental stressors in general. Hence, the present review aims to decipher the heuristic value of a biological definition of sepsis as a failing stress response. These considerations may motivate a better understanding of the processes underlying “host defense failure” on the organismic, organ, cell and molecular levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8715410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87154102021-12-29 Towards an ecological definition of sepsis: a viewpoint Bauer, Michael Shankar-Hari, Manu Thomas-Rüddel, Daniel O. Wetzker, Reinhard Intensive Care Med Exp Reviews In critically ill patients with sepsis, there is a grave lack of effective treatment options to address the illness-defining inappropriate host response. Currently, treatment is limited to source control and supportive care, albeit with imminent approval of immune modulating drugs for COVID-19-associated lung failure the potential of host-directed strategies appears on the horizon. We suggest expanding the concept of sepsis by incorporating infectious stress within the general stress response of the cell to define sepsis as an illness state characterized by allostatic overload and failing adaptive responses along with biotic (pathogen) and abiotic (e.g., malnutrition) environmental stress factors. This would allow conceptualizing the failing organismic responses to pathogens in sepsis with an ancient response pattern depending on the energy state of cells and organs towards other environmental stressors in general. Hence, the present review aims to decipher the heuristic value of a biological definition of sepsis as a failing stress response. These considerations may motivate a better understanding of the processes underlying “host defense failure” on the organismic, organ, cell and molecular levels. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8715410/ /pubmed/34964952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-021-00427-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Reviews Bauer, Michael Shankar-Hari, Manu Thomas-Rüddel, Daniel O. Wetzker, Reinhard Towards an ecological definition of sepsis: a viewpoint |
title | Towards an ecological definition of sepsis: a viewpoint |
title_full | Towards an ecological definition of sepsis: a viewpoint |
title_fullStr | Towards an ecological definition of sepsis: a viewpoint |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards an ecological definition of sepsis: a viewpoint |
title_short | Towards an ecological definition of sepsis: a viewpoint |
title_sort | towards an ecological definition of sepsis: a viewpoint |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-021-00427-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bauermichael towardsanecologicaldefinitionofsepsisaviewpoint AT shankarharimanu towardsanecologicaldefinitionofsepsisaviewpoint AT thomasruddeldanielo towardsanecologicaldefinitionofsepsisaviewpoint AT wetzkerreinhard towardsanecologicaldefinitionofsepsisaviewpoint |