Cargando…
Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets
BACKGROUND: The proportion of days covered (PDC) is used to estimate medication adherence by looking at the proportion of days in which a person has access to the medication, over a given period of interest. This study aimed to adapt the PDC algorithm to allow for plausible assumptions about prescri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w |
_version_ | 1784624157400498176 |
---|---|
author | Prieto-Merino, David Mulick, Amy Armstrong, Craig Hoult, Helen Fawcett, Scott Eliasson, Lina Clifford, Sarah |
author_facet | Prieto-Merino, David Mulick, Amy Armstrong, Craig Hoult, Helen Fawcett, Scott Eliasson, Lina Clifford, Sarah |
author_sort | Prieto-Merino, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The proportion of days covered (PDC) is used to estimate medication adherence by looking at the proportion of days in which a person has access to the medication, over a given period of interest. This study aimed to adapt the PDC algorithm to allow for plausible assumptions about prescription refill behaviour when applied to data from online pharmacy suppliers. METHODS: Three PDC algorithms, the conventional approach (PDC1) and two alternative approaches (PDC2 and PDC3), were used to estimate adherence in a real-world dataset from an online pharmacy. Each algorithm has different denominators and increasing levels of complexity. PDC1, the conventional approach, is the total number of days between first dispensation and a defined end date. PDC2 counts the days until the end of supply date. PDC3 removes from the denominator specifically defined large gaps between refills, which could indicate legitimate reasons for treatment discontinuation. The distribution of the three PDCs across four different follow-up lengths was compared. RESULTS: The dataset included people taking ACE inhibitors (n = 65,905), statins (n = 100,362), and/or thyroid hormones (n = 30,637). The proportion of people taking ACE inhibitors with PDC ≥ 0.8 was 50–74% for PDC1, 81–91% for PDC2, and 86–100% for PDC3 with values depending on drug and length of follow-up. Similar ranges were identified in people taking statins and thyroid hormones. CONCLUSION: These algorithms enable researchers and healthcare providers to assess pharmacy services and individual levels of adherence in real-world databases, particularly in settings where people may switch between different suppliers of medicines, meaning an individual supplier’s data may show temporary but legitimate gaps in access to medication. Accurately identifying problems with adherence provides the foundation for opportunities to improve experience, adherence and outcomes and to reduce medicines wastage. Research with people taking medications and prescribers is required to validate the algorithms’ assumptions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8715592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87155922022-01-05 Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets Prieto-Merino, David Mulick, Amy Armstrong, Craig Hoult, Helen Fawcett, Scott Eliasson, Lina Clifford, Sarah J Pharm Policy Pract Research BACKGROUND: The proportion of days covered (PDC) is used to estimate medication adherence by looking at the proportion of days in which a person has access to the medication, over a given period of interest. This study aimed to adapt the PDC algorithm to allow for plausible assumptions about prescription refill behaviour when applied to data from online pharmacy suppliers. METHODS: Three PDC algorithms, the conventional approach (PDC1) and two alternative approaches (PDC2 and PDC3), were used to estimate adherence in a real-world dataset from an online pharmacy. Each algorithm has different denominators and increasing levels of complexity. PDC1, the conventional approach, is the total number of days between first dispensation and a defined end date. PDC2 counts the days until the end of supply date. PDC3 removes from the denominator specifically defined large gaps between refills, which could indicate legitimate reasons for treatment discontinuation. The distribution of the three PDCs across four different follow-up lengths was compared. RESULTS: The dataset included people taking ACE inhibitors (n = 65,905), statins (n = 100,362), and/or thyroid hormones (n = 30,637). The proportion of people taking ACE inhibitors with PDC ≥ 0.8 was 50–74% for PDC1, 81–91% for PDC2, and 86–100% for PDC3 with values depending on drug and length of follow-up. Similar ranges were identified in people taking statins and thyroid hormones. CONCLUSION: These algorithms enable researchers and healthcare providers to assess pharmacy services and individual levels of adherence in real-world databases, particularly in settings where people may switch between different suppliers of medicines, meaning an individual supplier’s data may show temporary but legitimate gaps in access to medication. Accurately identifying problems with adherence provides the foundation for opportunities to improve experience, adherence and outcomes and to reduce medicines wastage. Research with people taking medications and prescribers is required to validate the algorithms’ assumptions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w. BioMed Central 2021-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8715592/ /pubmed/34965882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Prieto-Merino, David Mulick, Amy Armstrong, Craig Hoult, Helen Fawcett, Scott Eliasson, Lina Clifford, Sarah Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets |
title | Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets |
title_full | Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets |
title_fullStr | Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets |
title_short | Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets |
title_sort | estimating proportion of days covered (pdc) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prietomerinodavid estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets AT mulickamy estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets AT armstrongcraig estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets AT houlthelen estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets AT fawcettscott estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets AT eliassonlina estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets AT cliffordsarah estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets |