Cargando…

Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets

BACKGROUND: The proportion of days covered (PDC) is used to estimate medication adherence by looking at the proportion of days in which a person has access to the medication, over a given period of interest. This study aimed to adapt the PDC algorithm to allow for plausible assumptions about prescri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prieto-Merino, David, Mulick, Amy, Armstrong, Craig, Hoult, Helen, Fawcett, Scott, Eliasson, Lina, Clifford, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w
_version_ 1784624157400498176
author Prieto-Merino, David
Mulick, Amy
Armstrong, Craig
Hoult, Helen
Fawcett, Scott
Eliasson, Lina
Clifford, Sarah
author_facet Prieto-Merino, David
Mulick, Amy
Armstrong, Craig
Hoult, Helen
Fawcett, Scott
Eliasson, Lina
Clifford, Sarah
author_sort Prieto-Merino, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The proportion of days covered (PDC) is used to estimate medication adherence by looking at the proportion of days in which a person has access to the medication, over a given period of interest. This study aimed to adapt the PDC algorithm to allow for plausible assumptions about prescription refill behaviour when applied to data from online pharmacy suppliers. METHODS: Three PDC algorithms, the conventional approach (PDC1) and two alternative approaches (PDC2 and PDC3), were used to estimate adherence in a real-world dataset from an online pharmacy. Each algorithm has different denominators and increasing levels of complexity. PDC1, the conventional approach, is the total number of days between first dispensation and a defined end date. PDC2 counts the days until the end of supply date. PDC3 removes from the denominator specifically defined large gaps between refills, which could indicate legitimate reasons for treatment discontinuation. The distribution of the three PDCs across four different follow-up lengths was compared. RESULTS: The dataset included people taking ACE inhibitors (n = 65,905), statins (n = 100,362), and/or thyroid hormones (n = 30,637). The proportion of people taking ACE inhibitors with PDC ≥ 0.8 was 50–74% for PDC1, 81–91% for PDC2, and 86–100% for PDC3 with values depending on drug and length of follow-up. Similar ranges were identified in people taking statins and thyroid hormones. CONCLUSION: These algorithms enable researchers and healthcare providers to assess pharmacy services and individual levels of adherence in real-world databases, particularly in settings where people may switch between different suppliers of medicines, meaning an individual supplier’s data may show temporary but legitimate gaps in access to medication. Accurately identifying problems with adherence provides the foundation for opportunities to improve experience, adherence and outcomes and to reduce medicines wastage. Research with people taking medications and prescribers is required to validate the algorithms’ assumptions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8715592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87155922022-01-05 Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets Prieto-Merino, David Mulick, Amy Armstrong, Craig Hoult, Helen Fawcett, Scott Eliasson, Lina Clifford, Sarah J Pharm Policy Pract Research BACKGROUND: The proportion of days covered (PDC) is used to estimate medication adherence by looking at the proportion of days in which a person has access to the medication, over a given period of interest. This study aimed to adapt the PDC algorithm to allow for plausible assumptions about prescription refill behaviour when applied to data from online pharmacy suppliers. METHODS: Three PDC algorithms, the conventional approach (PDC1) and two alternative approaches (PDC2 and PDC3), were used to estimate adherence in a real-world dataset from an online pharmacy. Each algorithm has different denominators and increasing levels of complexity. PDC1, the conventional approach, is the total number of days between first dispensation and a defined end date. PDC2 counts the days until the end of supply date. PDC3 removes from the denominator specifically defined large gaps between refills, which could indicate legitimate reasons for treatment discontinuation. The distribution of the three PDCs across four different follow-up lengths was compared. RESULTS: The dataset included people taking ACE inhibitors (n = 65,905), statins (n = 100,362), and/or thyroid hormones (n = 30,637). The proportion of people taking ACE inhibitors with PDC ≥ 0.8 was 50–74% for PDC1, 81–91% for PDC2, and 86–100% for PDC3 with values depending on drug and length of follow-up. Similar ranges were identified in people taking statins and thyroid hormones. CONCLUSION: These algorithms enable researchers and healthcare providers to assess pharmacy services and individual levels of adherence in real-world databases, particularly in settings where people may switch between different suppliers of medicines, meaning an individual supplier’s data may show temporary but legitimate gaps in access to medication. Accurately identifying problems with adherence provides the foundation for opportunities to improve experience, adherence and outcomes and to reduce medicines wastage. Research with people taking medications and prescribers is required to validate the algorithms’ assumptions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w. BioMed Central 2021-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8715592/ /pubmed/34965882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Prieto-Merino, David
Mulick, Amy
Armstrong, Craig
Hoult, Helen
Fawcett, Scott
Eliasson, Lina
Clifford, Sarah
Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets
title Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets
title_full Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets
title_fullStr Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets
title_full_unstemmed Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets
title_short Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets
title_sort estimating proportion of days covered (pdc) using real-world online medicine suppliers’ datasets
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w
work_keys_str_mv AT prietomerinodavid estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets
AT mulickamy estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets
AT armstrongcraig estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets
AT houlthelen estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets
AT fawcettscott estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets
AT eliassonlina estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets
AT cliffordsarah estimatingproportionofdayscoveredpdcusingrealworldonlinemedicinesuppliersdatasets