Cargando…
Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The optimal technique of abdominal wall infiltration for chronic abdominal wall pain due to anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare pain reduction after an abdominal wall anaesthetic injection by use of an ultrasound-guided te...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab124 |
_version_ | 1784624187139162112 |
---|---|
author | Jacobs, Monica L Y E van den Dungen-Roelofsen, Rosanne Heemskerk, Jeroen Scheltinga, Marc R M Roumen, Rudi M H |
author_facet | Jacobs, Monica L Y E van den Dungen-Roelofsen, Rosanne Heemskerk, Jeroen Scheltinga, Marc R M Roumen, Rudi M H |
author_sort | Jacobs, Monica L Y E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal technique of abdominal wall infiltration for chronic abdominal wall pain due to anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare pain reduction after an abdominal wall anaesthetic injection by use of an ultrasound-guided technique (US) or given freehand (FH). METHODS: In this multicentre non-blinded randomized trial, adult patients with ACNES were randomized (1:1) to an US or a FH injection technique. Primary outcome was the proportion of injections achieving a minimum of 50 per cent pain reduction on the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0–10) 15–20 min after abdominal wall infiltration (‘successful response’). Secondary outcomes were treatment efficacy after 6 weeks and 3 months, and the influence of the subcutaneous tissue thickness on treatment outcome. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and April 2020, 391 injections (US = 192, FH = 199) were administered in 117 randomized patients (US = 55, FH = 62; 76.0 per cent female, mean age 45 years). The proportion of successful responses did not significantly differ immediately after the injection regimen (US 27.1 per cent versus FH 33.2 per cent; P = 0.19) or after 3 months (US 29.4 per cent versus FH 30.5 per cent; P = 0.90). Success was not determined by subcutaneous tissue thickness. CONCLUSION: Pain relief following abdominal wall infiltration by a US or FH technique in ACNES is similar and not influenced by subcutaneous tissue thickness. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Clinical Trial Register NL8465. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8715735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87157352022-01-04 Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial Jacobs, Monica L Y E van den Dungen-Roelofsen, Rosanne Heemskerk, Jeroen Scheltinga, Marc R M Roumen, Rudi M H BJS Open Randomized Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: The optimal technique of abdominal wall infiltration for chronic abdominal wall pain due to anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare pain reduction after an abdominal wall anaesthetic injection by use of an ultrasound-guided technique (US) or given freehand (FH). METHODS: In this multicentre non-blinded randomized trial, adult patients with ACNES were randomized (1:1) to an US or a FH injection technique. Primary outcome was the proportion of injections achieving a minimum of 50 per cent pain reduction on the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0–10) 15–20 min after abdominal wall infiltration (‘successful response’). Secondary outcomes were treatment efficacy after 6 weeks and 3 months, and the influence of the subcutaneous tissue thickness on treatment outcome. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and April 2020, 391 injections (US = 192, FH = 199) were administered in 117 randomized patients (US = 55, FH = 62; 76.0 per cent female, mean age 45 years). The proportion of successful responses did not significantly differ immediately after the injection regimen (US 27.1 per cent versus FH 33.2 per cent; P = 0.19) or after 3 months (US 29.4 per cent versus FH 30.5 per cent; P = 0.90). Success was not determined by subcutaneous tissue thickness. CONCLUSION: Pain relief following abdominal wall infiltration by a US or FH technique in ACNES is similar and not influenced by subcutaneous tissue thickness. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Clinical Trial Register NL8465. Oxford University Press 2021-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8715735/ /pubmed/34964825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab124 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Randomized Clinical Trial Jacobs, Monica L Y E van den Dungen-Roelofsen, Rosanne Heemskerk, Jeroen Scheltinga, Marc R M Roumen, Rudi M H Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial |
title | Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (acnes): randomized clinical trial |
topic | Randomized Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacobsmonicalye ultrasoundguidedabdominalwallinfiltrationversusfreehandtechniqueinanteriorcutaneousnerveentrapmentsyndromeacnesrandomizedclinicaltrial AT vandendungenroelofsenrosanne ultrasoundguidedabdominalwallinfiltrationversusfreehandtechniqueinanteriorcutaneousnerveentrapmentsyndromeacnesrandomizedclinicaltrial AT heemskerkjeroen ultrasoundguidedabdominalwallinfiltrationversusfreehandtechniqueinanteriorcutaneousnerveentrapmentsyndromeacnesrandomizedclinicaltrial AT scheltingamarcrm ultrasoundguidedabdominalwallinfiltrationversusfreehandtechniqueinanteriorcutaneousnerveentrapmentsyndromeacnesrandomizedclinicaltrial AT roumenrudimh ultrasoundguidedabdominalwallinfiltrationversusfreehandtechniqueinanteriorcutaneousnerveentrapmentsyndromeacnesrandomizedclinicaltrial |