Cargando…

Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The optimal technique of abdominal wall infiltration for chronic abdominal wall pain due to anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare pain reduction after an abdominal wall anaesthetic injection by use of an ultrasound-guided te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobs, Monica L Y E, van den Dungen-Roelofsen, Rosanne, Heemskerk, Jeroen, Scheltinga, Marc R M, Roumen, Rudi M H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab124
_version_ 1784624187139162112
author Jacobs, Monica L Y E
van den Dungen-Roelofsen, Rosanne
Heemskerk, Jeroen
Scheltinga, Marc R M
Roumen, Rudi M H
author_facet Jacobs, Monica L Y E
van den Dungen-Roelofsen, Rosanne
Heemskerk, Jeroen
Scheltinga, Marc R M
Roumen, Rudi M H
author_sort Jacobs, Monica L Y E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal technique of abdominal wall infiltration for chronic abdominal wall pain due to anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare pain reduction after an abdominal wall anaesthetic injection by use of an ultrasound-guided technique (US) or given freehand (FH). METHODS: In this multicentre non-blinded randomized trial, adult patients with ACNES were randomized (1:1) to an US or a FH injection technique. Primary outcome was the proportion of injections achieving a minimum of 50 per cent pain reduction on the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0–10) 15–20 min after abdominal wall infiltration (‘successful response’). Secondary outcomes were treatment efficacy after 6 weeks and 3 months, and the influence of the subcutaneous tissue thickness on treatment outcome. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and April 2020, 391 injections (US = 192, FH = 199) were administered in 117 randomized patients (US = 55, FH = 62; 76.0 per cent female, mean age 45 years). The proportion of successful responses did not significantly differ immediately after the injection regimen (US 27.1 per cent versus FH 33.2 per cent; P = 0.19) or after 3 months (US 29.4 per cent versus FH 30.5 per cent; P = 0.90). Success was not determined by subcutaneous tissue thickness. CONCLUSION: Pain relief following abdominal wall infiltration by a US or FH technique in ACNES is similar and not influenced by subcutaneous tissue thickness. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Clinical Trial Register NL8465.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8715735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87157352022-01-04 Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial Jacobs, Monica L Y E van den Dungen-Roelofsen, Rosanne Heemskerk, Jeroen Scheltinga, Marc R M Roumen, Rudi M H BJS Open Randomized Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: The optimal technique of abdominal wall infiltration for chronic abdominal wall pain due to anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare pain reduction after an abdominal wall anaesthetic injection by use of an ultrasound-guided technique (US) or given freehand (FH). METHODS: In this multicentre non-blinded randomized trial, adult patients with ACNES were randomized (1:1) to an US or a FH injection technique. Primary outcome was the proportion of injections achieving a minimum of 50 per cent pain reduction on the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0–10) 15–20 min after abdominal wall infiltration (‘successful response’). Secondary outcomes were treatment efficacy after 6 weeks and 3 months, and the influence of the subcutaneous tissue thickness on treatment outcome. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and April 2020, 391 injections (US = 192, FH = 199) were administered in 117 randomized patients (US = 55, FH = 62; 76.0 per cent female, mean age 45 years). The proportion of successful responses did not significantly differ immediately after the injection regimen (US 27.1 per cent versus FH 33.2 per cent; P = 0.19) or after 3 months (US 29.4 per cent versus FH 30.5 per cent; P = 0.90). Success was not determined by subcutaneous tissue thickness. CONCLUSION: Pain relief following abdominal wall infiltration by a US or FH technique in ACNES is similar and not influenced by subcutaneous tissue thickness. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Clinical Trial Register NL8465. Oxford University Press 2021-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8715735/ /pubmed/34964825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab124 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Randomized Clinical Trial
Jacobs, Monica L Y E
van den Dungen-Roelofsen, Rosanne
Heemskerk, Jeroen
Scheltinga, Marc R M
Roumen, Rudi M H
Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial
title Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial
title_full Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial
title_short Ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): randomized clinical trial
title_sort ultrasound-guided abdominal wall infiltration versus freehand technique in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (acnes): randomized clinical trial
topic Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab124
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsmonicalye ultrasoundguidedabdominalwallinfiltrationversusfreehandtechniqueinanteriorcutaneousnerveentrapmentsyndromeacnesrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT vandendungenroelofsenrosanne ultrasoundguidedabdominalwallinfiltrationversusfreehandtechniqueinanteriorcutaneousnerveentrapmentsyndromeacnesrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT heemskerkjeroen ultrasoundguidedabdominalwallinfiltrationversusfreehandtechniqueinanteriorcutaneousnerveentrapmentsyndromeacnesrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT scheltingamarcrm ultrasoundguidedabdominalwallinfiltrationversusfreehandtechniqueinanteriorcutaneousnerveentrapmentsyndromeacnesrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT roumenrudimh ultrasoundguidedabdominalwallinfiltrationversusfreehandtechniqueinanteriorcutaneousnerveentrapmentsyndromeacnesrandomizedclinicaltrial