Cargando…

The Borderline Bias in Explicit Emotion Interpretation

Atypical emotion interpretation has been widely reported in individuals with borderline personality disorder (iBPD); however, empirical studies reported mixed results so far. We suggest that discrepancies in observations of emotion interpretation by iBPD can be explained by biases related to their f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyniewska, Sylwia, Dąbrowska, Joanna, Makowska, Iwona, Jankowiak-Siuda, Kamila, Rymarczyk, Krystyna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34975623
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733742
_version_ 1784624204760481792
author Hyniewska, Sylwia
Dąbrowska, Joanna
Makowska, Iwona
Jankowiak-Siuda, Kamila
Rymarczyk, Krystyna
author_facet Hyniewska, Sylwia
Dąbrowska, Joanna
Makowska, Iwona
Jankowiak-Siuda, Kamila
Rymarczyk, Krystyna
author_sort Hyniewska, Sylwia
collection PubMed
description Atypical emotion interpretation has been widely reported in individuals with borderline personality disorder (iBPD); however, empirical studies reported mixed results so far. We suggest that discrepancies in observations of emotion interpretation by iBPD can be explained by biases related to their fear of rejection and abandonment, i.e., the three moral emotions of anger, disgust, and contempt. In this study, we hypothesized that iBPD would show a higher tendency to correctly interpret these three displays of social rejection and attribute more negative valence. A total of 28 inpatient iBPDs and 28 healthy controls were asked to judge static and dynamic facial expressions in terms of emotions, valence, and self-reported arousal evoked by the observed faces. Our results partially confirmed our expectations. The iBPD correctly interpreted the three unambiguous moral emotions. Contempt, a complex emotion with a difficulty in recognizing facial expressions, was recognized better by iBPD than by healthy controls. All negative emotions were judged more negatively by iBPD than by controls, but no difference was observed in the neutral or positive emotion. Alexithymia and anxiety trait and state levels were controlled in all analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8715824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87158242021-12-30 The Borderline Bias in Explicit Emotion Interpretation Hyniewska, Sylwia Dąbrowska, Joanna Makowska, Iwona Jankowiak-Siuda, Kamila Rymarczyk, Krystyna Front Psychol Psychology Atypical emotion interpretation has been widely reported in individuals with borderline personality disorder (iBPD); however, empirical studies reported mixed results so far. We suggest that discrepancies in observations of emotion interpretation by iBPD can be explained by biases related to their fear of rejection and abandonment, i.e., the three moral emotions of anger, disgust, and contempt. In this study, we hypothesized that iBPD would show a higher tendency to correctly interpret these three displays of social rejection and attribute more negative valence. A total of 28 inpatient iBPDs and 28 healthy controls were asked to judge static and dynamic facial expressions in terms of emotions, valence, and self-reported arousal evoked by the observed faces. Our results partially confirmed our expectations. The iBPD correctly interpreted the three unambiguous moral emotions. Contempt, a complex emotion with a difficulty in recognizing facial expressions, was recognized better by iBPD than by healthy controls. All negative emotions were judged more negatively by iBPD than by controls, but no difference was observed in the neutral or positive emotion. Alexithymia and anxiety trait and state levels were controlled in all analyses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8715824/ /pubmed/34975623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733742 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hyniewska, Dąbrowska, Makowska, Jankowiak-Siuda and Rymarczyk. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hyniewska, Sylwia
Dąbrowska, Joanna
Makowska, Iwona
Jankowiak-Siuda, Kamila
Rymarczyk, Krystyna
The Borderline Bias in Explicit Emotion Interpretation
title The Borderline Bias in Explicit Emotion Interpretation
title_full The Borderline Bias in Explicit Emotion Interpretation
title_fullStr The Borderline Bias in Explicit Emotion Interpretation
title_full_unstemmed The Borderline Bias in Explicit Emotion Interpretation
title_short The Borderline Bias in Explicit Emotion Interpretation
title_sort borderline bias in explicit emotion interpretation
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34975623
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733742
work_keys_str_mv AT hyniewskasylwia theborderlinebiasinexplicitemotioninterpretation
AT dabrowskajoanna theborderlinebiasinexplicitemotioninterpretation
AT makowskaiwona theborderlinebiasinexplicitemotioninterpretation
AT jankowiaksiudakamila theborderlinebiasinexplicitemotioninterpretation
AT rymarczykkrystyna theborderlinebiasinexplicitemotioninterpretation
AT hyniewskasylwia borderlinebiasinexplicitemotioninterpretation
AT dabrowskajoanna borderlinebiasinexplicitemotioninterpretation
AT makowskaiwona borderlinebiasinexplicitemotioninterpretation
AT jankowiaksiudakamila borderlinebiasinexplicitemotioninterpretation
AT rymarczykkrystyna borderlinebiasinexplicitemotioninterpretation