Cargando…
Non-GM Genome Editing Approaches in Crops
CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing technologies have the potential to fast-track large-scale crop breeding programs. However, the rigid cell wall limits the delivery of CRISPR/Cas components into plant cells, decreasing genome editing efficiency. Established methods, such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens-m...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2021.817279 |
_version_ | 1784624226504802304 |
---|---|
author | Gong, Zheng Cheng, Ming Botella, Jose R. |
author_facet | Gong, Zheng Cheng, Ming Botella, Jose R. |
author_sort | Gong, Zheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing technologies have the potential to fast-track large-scale crop breeding programs. However, the rigid cell wall limits the delivery of CRISPR/Cas components into plant cells, decreasing genome editing efficiency. Established methods, such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated or biolistic transformation have been used to integrate genetic cassettes containing CRISPR components into the plant genome. Although efficient, these methods pose several problems, including 1) The transformation process requires laborious and time-consuming tissue culture and regeneration steps; 2) many crop species and elite varieties are recalcitrant to transformation; 3) The segregation of transgenes in vegetatively propagated or highly heterozygous crops, such as pineapple, is either difficult or impossible; and 4) The production of a genetically modified first generation can lead to public controversy and onerous government regulations. The development of transgene-free genome editing technologies can address many problems associated with transgenic-based approaches. Transgene-free genome editing have been achieved through the delivery of preassembled CRISPR/Cas ribonucleoproteins, although its application is limited. The use of viral vectors for delivery of CRISPR/Cas components has recently emerged as a powerful alternative but it requires further exploration. In this review, we discuss the different strategies, principles, applications, and future directions of transgene-free genome editing methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8715957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87159572021-12-30 Non-GM Genome Editing Approaches in Crops Gong, Zheng Cheng, Ming Botella, Jose R. Front Genome Ed Genome Editing CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing technologies have the potential to fast-track large-scale crop breeding programs. However, the rigid cell wall limits the delivery of CRISPR/Cas components into plant cells, decreasing genome editing efficiency. Established methods, such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated or biolistic transformation have been used to integrate genetic cassettes containing CRISPR components into the plant genome. Although efficient, these methods pose several problems, including 1) The transformation process requires laborious and time-consuming tissue culture and regeneration steps; 2) many crop species and elite varieties are recalcitrant to transformation; 3) The segregation of transgenes in vegetatively propagated or highly heterozygous crops, such as pineapple, is either difficult or impossible; and 4) The production of a genetically modified first generation can lead to public controversy and onerous government regulations. The development of transgene-free genome editing technologies can address many problems associated with transgenic-based approaches. Transgene-free genome editing have been achieved through the delivery of preassembled CRISPR/Cas ribonucleoproteins, although its application is limited. The use of viral vectors for delivery of CRISPR/Cas components has recently emerged as a powerful alternative but it requires further exploration. In this review, we discuss the different strategies, principles, applications, and future directions of transgene-free genome editing methods. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8715957/ /pubmed/34977860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2021.817279 Text en Copyright © 2021 Gong, Cheng and Botella. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genome Editing Gong, Zheng Cheng, Ming Botella, Jose R. Non-GM Genome Editing Approaches in Crops |
title | Non-GM Genome Editing Approaches in Crops |
title_full | Non-GM Genome Editing Approaches in Crops |
title_fullStr | Non-GM Genome Editing Approaches in Crops |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-GM Genome Editing Approaches in Crops |
title_short | Non-GM Genome Editing Approaches in Crops |
title_sort | non-gm genome editing approaches in crops |
topic | Genome Editing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2021.817279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gongzheng nongmgenomeeditingapproachesincrops AT chengming nongmgenomeeditingapproachesincrops AT botellajoser nongmgenomeeditingapproachesincrops |