Cargando…

Immediate Hemodynamic Responses to Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation in Critically Ill Elderly Patients

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) may develop diaphragmatic dysfunction, especially when artificial airways are used. Positive effects have been observed when using the transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS) technique in different clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olímpio Júnior, Hebert, Camilo, Gustavo Bittencourt, Fioritto, Aline Priori, Lopes, Agnaldo José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8716245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9091278
_version_ 1784624282905608192
author Olímpio Júnior, Hebert
Camilo, Gustavo Bittencourt
Fioritto, Aline Priori
Lopes, Agnaldo José
author_facet Olímpio Júnior, Hebert
Camilo, Gustavo Bittencourt
Fioritto, Aline Priori
Lopes, Agnaldo José
author_sort Olímpio Júnior, Hebert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) may develop diaphragmatic dysfunction, especially when artificial airways are used. Positive effects have been observed when using the transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS) technique in different clinical conditions. However, no study has evaluated the safety of TEDS in patients admitted to ICUs. This study is aimed at evaluating the influence of TEDS on the hemodynamic and vital parameters of critically ill elderly patients under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). METHODS: Forty-seven patients aged >60 years under IMV were evaluated for hemodynamic variables before and after TEDS. The procedure lasted 30 minutes and was performed once. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 33 men and 14 women with a mean age of 69.9 ± 7.64 years. The mean systolic blood pressures pre-TEDS and post-TEDS were 126.6 ± 23.7 and 122.9 ± 25.9, respectively (p = 0.467). The mean diastolic blood pressures pre-TEDS and post-TEDS were 71.1 ± 12.2 and 67.7 ± 14.2, respectively (p = 0.223). No significant differences in the mean arterial pressure or heart rate were found between the pre-TEDS and post-TEDS time points (p = 0.335 and p = 0.846, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that TEDS does not have clinically relevant impacts on hemodynamic or vital parameters in critically ill elderly patients. These findings point to the possible safety of TEDS application in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8716245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87162452021-12-30 Immediate Hemodynamic Responses to Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation in Critically Ill Elderly Patients Olímpio Júnior, Hebert Camilo, Gustavo Bittencourt Fioritto, Aline Priori Lopes, Agnaldo José Rehabil Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) may develop diaphragmatic dysfunction, especially when artificial airways are used. Positive effects have been observed when using the transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS) technique in different clinical conditions. However, no study has evaluated the safety of TEDS in patients admitted to ICUs. This study is aimed at evaluating the influence of TEDS on the hemodynamic and vital parameters of critically ill elderly patients under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). METHODS: Forty-seven patients aged >60 years under IMV were evaluated for hemodynamic variables before and after TEDS. The procedure lasted 30 minutes and was performed once. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 33 men and 14 women with a mean age of 69.9 ± 7.64 years. The mean systolic blood pressures pre-TEDS and post-TEDS were 126.6 ± 23.7 and 122.9 ± 25.9, respectively (p = 0.467). The mean diastolic blood pressures pre-TEDS and post-TEDS were 71.1 ± 12.2 and 67.7 ± 14.2, respectively (p = 0.223). No significant differences in the mean arterial pressure or heart rate were found between the pre-TEDS and post-TEDS time points (p = 0.335 and p = 0.846, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that TEDS does not have clinically relevant impacts on hemodynamic or vital parameters in critically ill elderly patients. These findings point to the possible safety of TEDS application in this population. Hindawi 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8716245/ /pubmed/34976410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9091278 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hebert Olímpio Júnior et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olímpio Júnior, Hebert
Camilo, Gustavo Bittencourt
Fioritto, Aline Priori
Lopes, Agnaldo José
Immediate Hemodynamic Responses to Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation in Critically Ill Elderly Patients
title Immediate Hemodynamic Responses to Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation in Critically Ill Elderly Patients
title_full Immediate Hemodynamic Responses to Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation in Critically Ill Elderly Patients
title_fullStr Immediate Hemodynamic Responses to Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation in Critically Ill Elderly Patients
title_full_unstemmed Immediate Hemodynamic Responses to Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation in Critically Ill Elderly Patients
title_short Immediate Hemodynamic Responses to Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation in Critically Ill Elderly Patients
title_sort immediate hemodynamic responses to transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation in critically ill elderly patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8716245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9091278
work_keys_str_mv AT olimpiojuniorhebert immediatehemodynamicresponsestotranscutaneouselectricaldiaphragmaticstimulationincriticallyillelderlypatients
AT camilogustavobittencourt immediatehemodynamicresponsestotranscutaneouselectricaldiaphragmaticstimulationincriticallyillelderlypatients
AT fiorittoalinepriori immediatehemodynamicresponsestotranscutaneouselectricaldiaphragmaticstimulationincriticallyillelderlypatients
AT lopesagnaldojose immediatehemodynamicresponsestotranscutaneouselectricaldiaphragmaticstimulationincriticallyillelderlypatients