Cargando…

A Computational Modeling Study to Investigate the Use of Epicranial Electrodes to Deliver Interferential Stimulation to Subcortical Regions

Background: Epicranial cortical stimulation (ECS) is a minimally invasive neuromodulation technique that works by passing electric current between subcutaneous electrodes positioned on the skull. ECS causes a stronger and more focused electric field in the cortex compared to transcranial electric st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khatoun, Ahmad, Asamoah, Boateng, Mc Laughlin, Myles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8716464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34975383
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.779271
_version_ 1784624329580871680
author Khatoun, Ahmad
Asamoah, Boateng
Mc Laughlin, Myles
author_facet Khatoun, Ahmad
Asamoah, Boateng
Mc Laughlin, Myles
author_sort Khatoun, Ahmad
collection PubMed
description Background: Epicranial cortical stimulation (ECS) is a minimally invasive neuromodulation technique that works by passing electric current between subcutaneous electrodes positioned on the skull. ECS causes a stronger and more focused electric field in the cortex compared to transcranial electric stimulation (TES) where the electrodes are placed on the scalp. However, it is unknown if ECS can target deeper regions where the electric fields become relatively weak and broad. Recently, interferential stimulation (IF) using scalp electrodes has been proposed as a novel technique to target subcortical regions. During IF, two high, but slightly different, frequencies are applied which sum to generate a low frequency field (i.e., 10 Hz) at a target subcortical region. We hypothesized that IF using ECS electrodes would cause stronger and more focused subcortical stimulation than that using TES electrodes. Objective: Use computational modeling to determine if interferential stimulation-epicranial cortical stimulation (IF-ECS) can target subcortical regions. Then, compare the focality and field strength of IF-ECS to that of interferential Stimulation-transcranial electric stimulation (IF-TES) in the same subcortical region. Methods: A human head computational model was developed with 19 TES and 19 ECS disk electrodes positioned on a 10–20 system. After tetrahedral mesh generation the model was imported to COMSOL where the electric field distribution was calculated for each electrode separately. Then in MATLAB, subcortical targets were defined and the optimal configurations were calculated for both the TES and ECS electrodes. Results: Interferential stimulation using ECS electrodes can deliver stronger and more focused electric fields to subcortical regions than IF using TES electrodes. Conclusion: Interferential stimulation combined with ECS is a promising approach for delivering subcortical stimulation without the need for a craniotomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8716464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87164642021-12-31 A Computational Modeling Study to Investigate the Use of Epicranial Electrodes to Deliver Interferential Stimulation to Subcortical Regions Khatoun, Ahmad Asamoah, Boateng Mc Laughlin, Myles Front Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Epicranial cortical stimulation (ECS) is a minimally invasive neuromodulation technique that works by passing electric current between subcutaneous electrodes positioned on the skull. ECS causes a stronger and more focused electric field in the cortex compared to transcranial electric stimulation (TES) where the electrodes are placed on the scalp. However, it is unknown if ECS can target deeper regions where the electric fields become relatively weak and broad. Recently, interferential stimulation (IF) using scalp electrodes has been proposed as a novel technique to target subcortical regions. During IF, two high, but slightly different, frequencies are applied which sum to generate a low frequency field (i.e., 10 Hz) at a target subcortical region. We hypothesized that IF using ECS electrodes would cause stronger and more focused subcortical stimulation than that using TES electrodes. Objective: Use computational modeling to determine if interferential stimulation-epicranial cortical stimulation (IF-ECS) can target subcortical regions. Then, compare the focality and field strength of IF-ECS to that of interferential Stimulation-transcranial electric stimulation (IF-TES) in the same subcortical region. Methods: A human head computational model was developed with 19 TES and 19 ECS disk electrodes positioned on a 10–20 system. After tetrahedral mesh generation the model was imported to COMSOL where the electric field distribution was calculated for each electrode separately. Then in MATLAB, subcortical targets were defined and the optimal configurations were calculated for both the TES and ECS electrodes. Results: Interferential stimulation using ECS electrodes can deliver stronger and more focused electric fields to subcortical regions than IF using TES electrodes. Conclusion: Interferential stimulation combined with ECS is a promising approach for delivering subcortical stimulation without the need for a craniotomy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8716464/ /pubmed/34975383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.779271 Text en Copyright © 2021 Khatoun, Asamoah and Mc Laughlin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Khatoun, Ahmad
Asamoah, Boateng
Mc Laughlin, Myles
A Computational Modeling Study to Investigate the Use of Epicranial Electrodes to Deliver Interferential Stimulation to Subcortical Regions
title A Computational Modeling Study to Investigate the Use of Epicranial Electrodes to Deliver Interferential Stimulation to Subcortical Regions
title_full A Computational Modeling Study to Investigate the Use of Epicranial Electrodes to Deliver Interferential Stimulation to Subcortical Regions
title_fullStr A Computational Modeling Study to Investigate the Use of Epicranial Electrodes to Deliver Interferential Stimulation to Subcortical Regions
title_full_unstemmed A Computational Modeling Study to Investigate the Use of Epicranial Electrodes to Deliver Interferential Stimulation to Subcortical Regions
title_short A Computational Modeling Study to Investigate the Use of Epicranial Electrodes to Deliver Interferential Stimulation to Subcortical Regions
title_sort computational modeling study to investigate the use of epicranial electrodes to deliver interferential stimulation to subcortical regions
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8716464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34975383
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.779271
work_keys_str_mv AT khatounahmad acomputationalmodelingstudytoinvestigatetheuseofepicranialelectrodestodeliverinterferentialstimulationtosubcorticalregions
AT asamoahboateng acomputationalmodelingstudytoinvestigatetheuseofepicranialelectrodestodeliverinterferentialstimulationtosubcorticalregions
AT mclaughlinmyles acomputationalmodelingstudytoinvestigatetheuseofepicranialelectrodestodeliverinterferentialstimulationtosubcorticalregions
AT khatounahmad computationalmodelingstudytoinvestigatetheuseofepicranialelectrodestodeliverinterferentialstimulationtosubcorticalregions
AT asamoahboateng computationalmodelingstudytoinvestigatetheuseofepicranialelectrodestodeliverinterferentialstimulationtosubcorticalregions
AT mclaughlinmyles computationalmodelingstudytoinvestigatetheuseofepicranialelectrodestodeliverinterferentialstimulationtosubcorticalregions