Cargando…

Risk Stratification for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma by Integrating Interim Evaluation and International Prognostic Index: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

The baseline International Prognostic Index (IPI) is not sufficient for the initial risk stratification of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with R‐CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). The aims of this study were to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Xue, Liu, Xiaoqian, Li, Xiaomei, Li, Yahan, Lu, Dongyue, Sun, Xue, Li, Ying, Hu, Shunfeng, Zhang, Yuanfeng, Zhou, Xiangxiang, Wang, Xin, Chen, Haiping, Fang, Xiaosheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8716489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.754964
_version_ 1784624332749668352
author Shi, Xue
Liu, Xiaoqian
Li, Xiaomei
Li, Yahan
Lu, Dongyue
Sun, Xue
Li, Ying
Hu, Shunfeng
Zhang, Yuanfeng
Zhou, Xiangxiang
Wang, Xin
Chen, Haiping
Fang, Xiaosheng
author_facet Shi, Xue
Liu, Xiaoqian
Li, Xiaomei
Li, Yahan
Lu, Dongyue
Sun, Xue
Li, Ying
Hu, Shunfeng
Zhang, Yuanfeng
Zhou, Xiangxiang
Wang, Xin
Chen, Haiping
Fang, Xiaosheng
author_sort Shi, Xue
collection PubMed
description The baseline International Prognostic Index (IPI) is not sufficient for the initial risk stratification of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with R‐CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). The aims of this study were to evaluate the prognostic relevance of early risk stratification in DLBCL and develop a new stratification system that combines an interim evaluation and IPI. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 314 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients with baseline and interim evaluations. All patients were treated with R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens as the first-line therapy. Survival differences were evaluated for different risk stratification systems including the IPI, interim evaluation, and the combined system. When stratified by IPI, the high-intermediate and high-risk groups presented overlapping survival curves with no significant differences, and the high-risk group still had >50% of 3-year overall survival (OS). The interim evaluation can also stratify patients into three groups, as 3-year OS and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in patients with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were not significantly different. The SD and PD patients had significantly lower 3-year OS and PFS rates than complete remission and partial response patients, but the percentage of these patients was only ~10%. The IPI and interim evaluation combined risk stratification system separated the patients into low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups. The 3-year OS rates were 96.4%, 86.7%, 46.4%, and 40%, while the 3-year PFS rates were 87.1%, 71.5%, 42.5%, and 7.2%. The OS comparison between the high-risk group and very high-risk group was marginally significant, and OS and PFS comparisons between any other two groups were significantly different. This combined risk stratification system could be a useful tool for the prognostic prediction of DLBCL patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8716489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87164892021-12-31 Risk Stratification for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma by Integrating Interim Evaluation and International Prognostic Index: A Multicenter Retrospective Study Shi, Xue Liu, Xiaoqian Li, Xiaomei Li, Yahan Lu, Dongyue Sun, Xue Li, Ying Hu, Shunfeng Zhang, Yuanfeng Zhou, Xiangxiang Wang, Xin Chen, Haiping Fang, Xiaosheng Front Oncol Oncology The baseline International Prognostic Index (IPI) is not sufficient for the initial risk stratification of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with R‐CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). The aims of this study were to evaluate the prognostic relevance of early risk stratification in DLBCL and develop a new stratification system that combines an interim evaluation and IPI. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 314 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients with baseline and interim evaluations. All patients were treated with R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens as the first-line therapy. Survival differences were evaluated for different risk stratification systems including the IPI, interim evaluation, and the combined system. When stratified by IPI, the high-intermediate and high-risk groups presented overlapping survival curves with no significant differences, and the high-risk group still had >50% of 3-year overall survival (OS). The interim evaluation can also stratify patients into three groups, as 3-year OS and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in patients with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were not significantly different. The SD and PD patients had significantly lower 3-year OS and PFS rates than complete remission and partial response patients, but the percentage of these patients was only ~10%. The IPI and interim evaluation combined risk stratification system separated the patients into low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups. The 3-year OS rates were 96.4%, 86.7%, 46.4%, and 40%, while the 3-year PFS rates were 87.1%, 71.5%, 42.5%, and 7.2%. The OS comparison between the high-risk group and very high-risk group was marginally significant, and OS and PFS comparisons between any other two groups were significantly different. This combined risk stratification system could be a useful tool for the prognostic prediction of DLBCL patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8716489/ /pubmed/34976802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.754964 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shi, Liu, Li, Li, Lu, Sun, Li, Hu, Zhang, Zhou, Wang, Chen and Fang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Shi, Xue
Liu, Xiaoqian
Li, Xiaomei
Li, Yahan
Lu, Dongyue
Sun, Xue
Li, Ying
Hu, Shunfeng
Zhang, Yuanfeng
Zhou, Xiangxiang
Wang, Xin
Chen, Haiping
Fang, Xiaosheng
Risk Stratification for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma by Integrating Interim Evaluation and International Prognostic Index: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title Risk Stratification for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma by Integrating Interim Evaluation and International Prognostic Index: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_full Risk Stratification for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma by Integrating Interim Evaluation and International Prognostic Index: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Risk Stratification for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma by Integrating Interim Evaluation and International Prognostic Index: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Risk Stratification for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma by Integrating Interim Evaluation and International Prognostic Index: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_short Risk Stratification for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma by Integrating Interim Evaluation and International Prognostic Index: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_sort risk stratification for diffuse large b-cell lymphoma by integrating interim evaluation and international prognostic index: a multicenter retrospective study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8716489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.754964
work_keys_str_mv AT shixue riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT liuxiaoqian riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT lixiaomei riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT liyahan riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT ludongyue riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT sunxue riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT liying riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT hushunfeng riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhangyuanfeng riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhouxiangxiang riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT wangxin riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT chenhaiping riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT fangxiaosheng riskstratificationfordiffuselargebcelllymphomabyintegratinginterimevaluationandinternationalprognosticindexamulticenterretrospectivestudy