Cargando…

Quantification of H(2)(17)O by (1)H-MR imaging at 3 T: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Indirect (1)H-magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of (17)O-labelled water allows imaging in vivo dynamic changes in water compartmentalisation. Our aim was to describe the feasibility of indirect (1)H-MR methods to evaluate the effect of H(2)(17)O on the MR relaxation rates by using conventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martí-Bonmatí, Luis, Rodríguez-Ortega, Alejandro, Ten-Esteve, Amadeo, Alberich-Bayarri, Ángel, Celda, Bernardo, Ferrer, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8716803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00246-w
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Indirect (1)H-magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of (17)O-labelled water allows imaging in vivo dynamic changes in water compartmentalisation. Our aim was to describe the feasibility of indirect (1)H-MR methods to evaluate the effect of H(2)(17)O on the MR relaxation rates by using conventional a 3-T equipment and voxel-wise relaxation rates. METHODS: MR images were used to calculate the R1, R2, and R2* relaxation rates in phantoms (19 vials with different H(2)(17)O concentrations, ranging from 0.039 to 5.5%). Afterwards, an experimental animal pilot study (8 rats) was designed to evaluate the in vivo relative R2 brain dynamic changes related to the intravenous administration of (17)O-labelled water in rats. RESULTS: There were no significant changes on the R1 and R2* values from phantoms. The R2 obtained with the turbo spin-echo T2-weighted sequence with 20-ms echo time interval had the higher statistical difference (0.67 s(−1), interquartile range 0.34, p < 0.001) and Spearman correlation (rho 0.79). The R2 increase was adjusted to a linear fit between 0.25 and 5.5%, represented with equation R2 = 0.405 concentration + 0.3215. The highest significant differences were obtained for the higher concentrations (3.1–5.5%). The rat brain MR experiment showed a mean 10% change in the R2 value after the H(2)(17)O injection with progressive normalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect (1)H-MR imaging method is able to measure H(2)(17)O concentration by using R2 values and conventional 3-T MR equipment. Normalised R2 relative dynamic changes after the intravenous injection of a H(2)(17)O saline solution provide a unique opportunity to map water pathophysiology in vivo, opening the analysis of aquaporins status and modifications by disease at clinically available 3-T proton MR scanners.