Cargando…
A feature-based network analysis and fMRI meta-analysis reveal three distinct types of prosocial decisions
Tasks that measure correlates of prosocial decision-making share one common feature: agents can make choices that increase the welfare of a beneficiary. However, prosocial decisions vary widely as a function of other task features. The diverse ways that prosociality is defined and the heterogeneity...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34160604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab079 |
_version_ | 1784624456342175744 |
---|---|
author | Rhoads, Shawn A Cutler, Jo Marsh, Abigail A |
author_facet | Rhoads, Shawn A Cutler, Jo Marsh, Abigail A |
author_sort | Rhoads, Shawn A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tasks that measure correlates of prosocial decision-making share one common feature: agents can make choices that increase the welfare of a beneficiary. However, prosocial decisions vary widely as a function of other task features. The diverse ways that prosociality is defined and the heterogeneity of prosocial decisions have created challenges for interpreting findings across studies and identifying their neural correlates. To overcome these challenges, we aimed to organize the prosocial decision-making task space of neuroimaging studies. We conducted a systematic search for studies in which participants made decisions to increase the welfare of others during functional magnetic resonance imaging. We identified shared and distinct features of these tasks and employed an unsupervised graph-based approach to assess how various forms of prosocial decision-making are related in terms of their low-level components (e.g. task features like potential cost to the agent or potential for reciprocity). Analyses uncovered three clusters of prosocial decisions, which we labeled as cooperation, equity and altruism. This feature-based representation of the task structure was supported by results of a neuroimaging meta-analysis that each type of prosocial decisions recruited diverging neural systems. Results clarify some of the existing heterogeneity in how prosociality is conceptualized and generate insight for future research and task paradigm development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8717062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87170622022-01-05 A feature-based network analysis and fMRI meta-analysis reveal three distinct types of prosocial decisions Rhoads, Shawn A Cutler, Jo Marsh, Abigail A Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Tasks that measure correlates of prosocial decision-making share one common feature: agents can make choices that increase the welfare of a beneficiary. However, prosocial decisions vary widely as a function of other task features. The diverse ways that prosociality is defined and the heterogeneity of prosocial decisions have created challenges for interpreting findings across studies and identifying their neural correlates. To overcome these challenges, we aimed to organize the prosocial decision-making task space of neuroimaging studies. We conducted a systematic search for studies in which participants made decisions to increase the welfare of others during functional magnetic resonance imaging. We identified shared and distinct features of these tasks and employed an unsupervised graph-based approach to assess how various forms of prosocial decision-making are related in terms of their low-level components (e.g. task features like potential cost to the agent or potential for reciprocity). Analyses uncovered three clusters of prosocial decisions, which we labeled as cooperation, equity and altruism. This feature-based representation of the task structure was supported by results of a neuroimaging meta-analysis that each type of prosocial decisions recruited diverging neural systems. Results clarify some of the existing heterogeneity in how prosociality is conceptualized and generate insight for future research and task paradigm development. Oxford University Press 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8717062/ /pubmed/34160604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab079 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscript Rhoads, Shawn A Cutler, Jo Marsh, Abigail A A feature-based network analysis and fMRI meta-analysis reveal three distinct types of prosocial decisions |
title | A feature-based network analysis and fMRI meta-analysis reveal three distinct types of prosocial decisions |
title_full | A feature-based network analysis and fMRI meta-analysis reveal three distinct types of prosocial decisions |
title_fullStr | A feature-based network analysis and fMRI meta-analysis reveal three distinct types of prosocial decisions |
title_full_unstemmed | A feature-based network analysis and fMRI meta-analysis reveal three distinct types of prosocial decisions |
title_short | A feature-based network analysis and fMRI meta-analysis reveal three distinct types of prosocial decisions |
title_sort | feature-based network analysis and fmri meta-analysis reveal three distinct types of prosocial decisions |
topic | Original Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34160604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rhoadsshawna afeaturebasednetworkanalysisandfmrimetaanalysisrevealthreedistincttypesofprosocialdecisions AT cutlerjo afeaturebasednetworkanalysisandfmrimetaanalysisrevealthreedistincttypesofprosocialdecisions AT marshabigaila afeaturebasednetworkanalysisandfmrimetaanalysisrevealthreedistincttypesofprosocialdecisions AT rhoadsshawna featurebasednetworkanalysisandfmrimetaanalysisrevealthreedistincttypesofprosocialdecisions AT cutlerjo featurebasednetworkanalysisandfmrimetaanalysisrevealthreedistincttypesofprosocialdecisions AT marshabigaila featurebasednetworkanalysisandfmrimetaanalysisrevealthreedistincttypesofprosocialdecisions |