Cargando…

Predicting preeclampsia and related risk factors using data mining approaches: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a type of pregnancy hypertension disorder that has adverse effects on both the mother and the fetus. Despite recent advances in the etiology of preeclampsia, no adequate clinical screening tests have been identified to diagnose the disorder. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manoochehri, Zohreh, Manoochehri, Sara, Soltani, Farzaneh, Tapak, Leili, Sadeghifar, Majid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Knowledge E 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977453
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v19i11.9911
_version_ 1784624459043307520
author Manoochehri, Zohreh
Manoochehri, Sara
Soltani, Farzaneh
Tapak, Leili
Sadeghifar, Majid
author_facet Manoochehri, Zohreh
Manoochehri, Sara
Soltani, Farzaneh
Tapak, Leili
Sadeghifar, Majid
author_sort Manoochehri, Zohreh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a type of pregnancy hypertension disorder that has adverse effects on both the mother and the fetus. Despite recent advances in the etiology of preeclampsia, no adequate clinical screening tests have been identified to diagnose the disorder. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide a model based on data mining approaches that can be used as a screening tool to identify patients with this syndrome and also to identify the risk factors associated with it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data used to perform this cross-sectional study were extracted from the clinical records of 726 mothers with preeclampsia and 726 mothers without preeclampsia who were referred to Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan City during April 2005–March 2015. In this study, six data mining methods were adopted, including logistic regression, k-nearest neighborhood, C5.0 decision tree, discriminant analysis, random forest, and support vector machine, and their performance was compared using the criteria of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: Underlying condition, age, pregnancy season and the number of pregnancies were the most important risk factors for diagnosing preeclampsia. The accuracy of the models were as follows: logistic regression (0.713), k-nearest neighborhood (0.742), C5.0 decision tree (0.788), discriminant analysis (0.687), random forest (0.758) and support vector machine (0.791). CONCLUSION: Among the data mining methods employed in this study, support vector machine was the most accurate in predicting preeclampsia. Therefore, this model can be considered as a screening tool to diagnose this disorder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8717074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Knowledge E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87170742021-12-30 Predicting preeclampsia and related risk factors using data mining approaches: A cross-sectional study Manoochehri, Zohreh Manoochehri, Sara Soltani, Farzaneh Tapak, Leili Sadeghifar, Majid Int J Reprod Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a type of pregnancy hypertension disorder that has adverse effects on both the mother and the fetus. Despite recent advances in the etiology of preeclampsia, no adequate clinical screening tests have been identified to diagnose the disorder. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide a model based on data mining approaches that can be used as a screening tool to identify patients with this syndrome and also to identify the risk factors associated with it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data used to perform this cross-sectional study were extracted from the clinical records of 726 mothers with preeclampsia and 726 mothers without preeclampsia who were referred to Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan City during April 2005–March 2015. In this study, six data mining methods were adopted, including logistic regression, k-nearest neighborhood, C5.0 decision tree, discriminant analysis, random forest, and support vector machine, and their performance was compared using the criteria of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: Underlying condition, age, pregnancy season and the number of pregnancies were the most important risk factors for diagnosing preeclampsia. The accuracy of the models were as follows: logistic regression (0.713), k-nearest neighborhood (0.742), C5.0 decision tree (0.788), discriminant analysis (0.687), random forest (0.758) and support vector machine (0.791). CONCLUSION: Among the data mining methods employed in this study, support vector machine was the most accurate in predicting preeclampsia. Therefore, this model can be considered as a screening tool to diagnose this disorder. Knowledge E 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8717074/ /pubmed/34977453 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v19i11.9911 Text en Copyright © 2021 Manoochehri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Manoochehri, Zohreh
Manoochehri, Sara
Soltani, Farzaneh
Tapak, Leili
Sadeghifar, Majid
Predicting preeclampsia and related risk factors using data mining approaches: A cross-sectional study
title Predicting preeclampsia and related risk factors using data mining approaches: A cross-sectional study
title_full Predicting preeclampsia and related risk factors using data mining approaches: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Predicting preeclampsia and related risk factors using data mining approaches: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Predicting preeclampsia and related risk factors using data mining approaches: A cross-sectional study
title_short Predicting preeclampsia and related risk factors using data mining approaches: A cross-sectional study
title_sort predicting preeclampsia and related risk factors using data mining approaches: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977453
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v19i11.9911
work_keys_str_mv AT manoochehrizohreh predictingpreeclampsiaandrelatedriskfactorsusingdataminingapproachesacrosssectionalstudy
AT manoochehrisara predictingpreeclampsiaandrelatedriskfactorsusingdataminingapproachesacrosssectionalstudy
AT soltanifarzaneh predictingpreeclampsiaandrelatedriskfactorsusingdataminingapproachesacrosssectionalstudy
AT tapakleili predictingpreeclampsiaandrelatedriskfactorsusingdataminingapproachesacrosssectionalstudy
AT sadeghifarmajid predictingpreeclampsiaandrelatedriskfactorsusingdataminingapproachesacrosssectionalstudy