A Literature Review on Biofilm Formation on Silicone and Poymethyl Methacrylate Used for Maxillofacial Prostheses

Silicone elastomers are considered the most suitable maxillofacial materials for extraoral prostheses to date due to their superior physicochemical properties. The aim of this review was to describe the characteristics of biofilm formation on silicone and polymethyl methacrylate used for maxillofacial prostheses and review different strategies of biofilm management for silicone maxillofacial prosthesis. A structured literature search was conducted using the following databases - PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, LILACS, IndeMED, OVID, EMBASE, NIH Clinical Trials - for reports related to the biofilms. English language articles were only included in the study. Biofilms induced various systemic infections if they are not treated at an early stage. Biofilms are formed due to various reasons like fungal, bacterial and mixed infections of the patient and also due to prosthetic appliances. The manual or mechanical pressure physically removes the biofilm and most biofilm molecules from surfaces. Treatment must be given with utmost caution and concern irrespective of the presence or absence of biofilm. With regards to the materials used for fabricating maxillofacial substitutes, it has been defined that both acrylic resin and silicone may harbour microorganisms, however, the larger porosities in silicone make it vulnerable to microbial adhesion. The major limitations of these materials are that they have numerous porosities on their surface and, along with the modification of the anatomy of the facial tissues as a result of the lesion, may compromise the natural balance of the microbial flora, favouring microbial colonization and formation of biofilms.