Cargando…
The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth
Seafloor characteristics can help in the prediction of fish distribution, which is required for fisheries and conservation management. Despite this, only 5%–10% of the world's seafloor has been mapped at high resolution, as it is a time‐consuming and expensive process. Multibeam echo‐sounders (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8351 |
_version_ | 1784624511695454208 |
---|---|
author | Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat Parsons, Miles J. G. Saunders, Benjamin J. Radford, Ben Salgado‐Kent, Chandra Parnum, Iain M. |
author_facet | Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat Parsons, Miles J. G. Saunders, Benjamin J. Radford, Ben Salgado‐Kent, Chandra Parnum, Iain M. |
author_sort | Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat |
collection | PubMed |
description | Seafloor characteristics can help in the prediction of fish distribution, which is required for fisheries and conservation management. Despite this, only 5%–10% of the world's seafloor has been mapped at high resolution, as it is a time‐consuming and expensive process. Multibeam echo‐sounders (MBES) can produce high‐resolution bathymetry and a broad swath coverage of the seafloor, but require greater financial and technical resources for operation and data analysis than singlebeam echo‐sounders (SBES). In contrast, SBES provide comparatively limited spatial coverage, as only a single measurement is made from directly under the vessel. Thus, producing a continuous map requires interpolation to fill gaps between transects. This study assesses the performance of demersal fish species distribution models by comparing those derived from interpolated SBES data with full‐coverage MBES distribution models. A Random Forest classifier was used to model the distribution of Abalistes stellatus, Gymnocranius grandoculis, Lagocephalus sceleratus, Loxodon macrorhinus, Pristipomoides multidens, and Pristipomoides typus, with depth and depth derivatives (slope, aspect, standard deviation of depth, terrain ruggedness index, mean curvature, and topographic position index) as explanatory variables. The results indicated that distribution models for A. stellatus, G. grandoculis, L. sceleratus, and L. macrorhinus performed poorly for MBES and SBES data with area under the receiver operator curves (AUC) below 0.7. Consequently, the distribution of these species could not be predicted by seafloor characteristics produced from either echo‐sounder type. Distribution models for P. multidens and P. typus performed well for MBES and the SBES data with an AUC above 0.8. Depth was the most important variable explaining the distribution of P. multidens and P. typus in both MBES and SBES models. While further research is needed, this study shows that in resource‐limited scenarios, SBES can produce comparable results to MBES for use in demersal fish management and conservation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8717343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87173432022-01-06 The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat Parsons, Miles J. G. Saunders, Benjamin J. Radford, Ben Salgado‐Kent, Chandra Parnum, Iain M. Ecol Evol Research Articles Seafloor characteristics can help in the prediction of fish distribution, which is required for fisheries and conservation management. Despite this, only 5%–10% of the world's seafloor has been mapped at high resolution, as it is a time‐consuming and expensive process. Multibeam echo‐sounders (MBES) can produce high‐resolution bathymetry and a broad swath coverage of the seafloor, but require greater financial and technical resources for operation and data analysis than singlebeam echo‐sounders (SBES). In contrast, SBES provide comparatively limited spatial coverage, as only a single measurement is made from directly under the vessel. Thus, producing a continuous map requires interpolation to fill gaps between transects. This study assesses the performance of demersal fish species distribution models by comparing those derived from interpolated SBES data with full‐coverage MBES distribution models. A Random Forest classifier was used to model the distribution of Abalistes stellatus, Gymnocranius grandoculis, Lagocephalus sceleratus, Loxodon macrorhinus, Pristipomoides multidens, and Pristipomoides typus, with depth and depth derivatives (slope, aspect, standard deviation of depth, terrain ruggedness index, mean curvature, and topographic position index) as explanatory variables. The results indicated that distribution models for A. stellatus, G. grandoculis, L. sceleratus, and L. macrorhinus performed poorly for MBES and SBES data with area under the receiver operator curves (AUC) below 0.7. Consequently, the distribution of these species could not be predicted by seafloor characteristics produced from either echo‐sounder type. Distribution models for P. multidens and P. typus performed well for MBES and the SBES data with an AUC above 0.8. Depth was the most important variable explaining the distribution of P. multidens and P. typus in both MBES and SBES models. While further research is needed, this study shows that in resource‐limited scenarios, SBES can produce comparable results to MBES for use in demersal fish management and conservation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8717343/ /pubmed/35003644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8351 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat Parsons, Miles J. G. Saunders, Benjamin J. Radford, Ben Salgado‐Kent, Chandra Parnum, Iain M. The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth |
title | The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth |
title_full | The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth |
title_fullStr | The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth |
title_short | The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth |
title_sort | use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8351 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT landerofigueroamarcelamontserrat theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT parsonsmilesjg theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT saundersbenjaminj theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT radfordben theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT salgadokentchandra theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT parnumiainm theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT landerofigueroamarcelamontserrat useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT parsonsmilesjg useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT saundersbenjaminj useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT radfordben useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT salgadokentchandra useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth AT parnumiainm useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth |