Cargando…

The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth

Seafloor characteristics can help in the prediction of fish distribution, which is required for fisheries and conservation management. Despite this, only 5%–10% of the world's seafloor has been mapped at high resolution, as it is a time‐consuming and expensive process. Multibeam echo‐sounders (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat, Parsons, Miles J. G., Saunders, Benjamin J., Radford, Ben, Salgado‐Kent, Chandra, Parnum, Iain M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8351
_version_ 1784624511695454208
author Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat
Parsons, Miles J. G.
Saunders, Benjamin J.
Radford, Ben
Salgado‐Kent, Chandra
Parnum, Iain M.
author_facet Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat
Parsons, Miles J. G.
Saunders, Benjamin J.
Radford, Ben
Salgado‐Kent, Chandra
Parnum, Iain M.
author_sort Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat
collection PubMed
description Seafloor characteristics can help in the prediction of fish distribution, which is required for fisheries and conservation management. Despite this, only 5%–10% of the world's seafloor has been mapped at high resolution, as it is a time‐consuming and expensive process. Multibeam echo‐sounders (MBES) can produce high‐resolution bathymetry and a broad swath coverage of the seafloor, but require greater financial and technical resources for operation and data analysis than singlebeam echo‐sounders (SBES). In contrast, SBES provide comparatively limited spatial coverage, as only a single measurement is made from directly under the vessel. Thus, producing a continuous map requires interpolation to fill gaps between transects. This study assesses the performance of demersal fish species distribution models by comparing those derived from interpolated SBES data with full‐coverage MBES distribution models. A Random Forest classifier was used to model the distribution of Abalistes stellatus, Gymnocranius grandoculis, Lagocephalus sceleratus, Loxodon macrorhinus, Pristipomoides multidens, and Pristipomoides typus, with depth and depth derivatives (slope, aspect, standard deviation of depth, terrain ruggedness index, mean curvature, and topographic position index) as explanatory variables. The results indicated that distribution models for A. stellatus, G. grandoculis, L. sceleratus, and L. macrorhinus performed poorly for MBES and SBES data with area under the receiver operator curves (AUC) below 0.7. Consequently, the distribution of these species could not be predicted by seafloor characteristics produced from either echo‐sounder type. Distribution models for P. multidens and P. typus performed well for MBES and the SBES data with an AUC above 0.8. Depth was the most important variable explaining the distribution of P. multidens and P. typus in both MBES and SBES models. While further research is needed, this study shows that in resource‐limited scenarios, SBES can produce comparable results to MBES for use in demersal fish management and conservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8717343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87173432022-01-06 The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat Parsons, Miles J. G. Saunders, Benjamin J. Radford, Ben Salgado‐Kent, Chandra Parnum, Iain M. Ecol Evol Research Articles Seafloor characteristics can help in the prediction of fish distribution, which is required for fisheries and conservation management. Despite this, only 5%–10% of the world's seafloor has been mapped at high resolution, as it is a time‐consuming and expensive process. Multibeam echo‐sounders (MBES) can produce high‐resolution bathymetry and a broad swath coverage of the seafloor, but require greater financial and technical resources for operation and data analysis than singlebeam echo‐sounders (SBES). In contrast, SBES provide comparatively limited spatial coverage, as only a single measurement is made from directly under the vessel. Thus, producing a continuous map requires interpolation to fill gaps between transects. This study assesses the performance of demersal fish species distribution models by comparing those derived from interpolated SBES data with full‐coverage MBES distribution models. A Random Forest classifier was used to model the distribution of Abalistes stellatus, Gymnocranius grandoculis, Lagocephalus sceleratus, Loxodon macrorhinus, Pristipomoides multidens, and Pristipomoides typus, with depth and depth derivatives (slope, aspect, standard deviation of depth, terrain ruggedness index, mean curvature, and topographic position index) as explanatory variables. The results indicated that distribution models for A. stellatus, G. grandoculis, L. sceleratus, and L. macrorhinus performed poorly for MBES and SBES data with area under the receiver operator curves (AUC) below 0.7. Consequently, the distribution of these species could not be predicted by seafloor characteristics produced from either echo‐sounder type. Distribution models for P. multidens and P. typus performed well for MBES and the SBES data with an AUC above 0.8. Depth was the most important variable explaining the distribution of P. multidens and P. typus in both MBES and SBES models. While further research is needed, this study shows that in resource‐limited scenarios, SBES can produce comparable results to MBES for use in demersal fish management and conservation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8717343/ /pubmed/35003644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8351 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Landero Figueroa, Marcela Montserrat
Parsons, Miles J. G.
Saunders, Benjamin J.
Radford, Ben
Salgado‐Kent, Chandra
Parnum, Iain M.
The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth
title The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth
title_full The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth
title_fullStr The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth
title_full_unstemmed The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth
title_short The use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth
title_sort use of singlebeam echo‐sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo‐sounder depth
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8351
work_keys_str_mv AT landerofigueroamarcelamontserrat theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT parsonsmilesjg theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT saundersbenjaminj theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT radfordben theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT salgadokentchandra theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT parnumiainm theuseofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT landerofigueroamarcelamontserrat useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT parsonsmilesjg useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT saundersbenjaminj useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT radfordben useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT salgadokentchandra useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth
AT parnumiainm useofsinglebeamechosounderdepthdatatoproducedemersalfishdistributionmodelsthatarecomparabletomodelsproducedusingmultibeamechosounderdepth