Cargando…

Recurrence of pericardial effusion after different procedure modalities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer with related pericardial effusion is not rare. Intervention is a crucial step for symptomatic effusion. It is unknown, however, whether the different invasive interventions for pericardial effusion result in different survival outcomes. This study analyzed the clinical charac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, L.-K., Kuo, Y.-W., Wu, S.-G., Chung, K.-P., Shih, J.-Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100354
_version_ 1784624532992032768
author Chang, L.-K.
Kuo, Y.-W.
Wu, S.-G.
Chung, K.-P.
Shih, J.-Y.
author_facet Chang, L.-K.
Kuo, Y.-W.
Wu, S.-G.
Chung, K.-P.
Shih, J.-Y.
author_sort Chang, L.-K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung cancer with related pericardial effusion is not rare. Intervention is a crucial step for symptomatic effusion. It is unknown, however, whether the different invasive interventions for pericardial effusion result in different survival outcomes. This study analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have undergone different procedures. METHODS: From January 2006 to June 2018, we collected data from patients with NSCLC who have received invasive intervention for pericardial effusions. The patients were divided into three categories: simple pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, and surgical pericardiectomy. Kaplan–Meier curve and log-rank test were used to analyze the pericardial effusion recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were enrolled. Adenocarcinoma (83.6%) was the major NSCLC subtype. Invasive intervention, including simple pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, and surgical pericardiectomy, had been carried out on 52, 170, and 22 patients, respectively. The 1-year RFS rates in simple pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, and surgical pericardiectomy were 19.2%, 31.2%, and 31.8%, respectively (P = 0.128), and the median RFS was 1.67, 5.03, and 8.32 months, respectively (P = 0.008). There was no significant difference in OS, however, with the median OS at 1.67, 6.43, and 8.32 months, respectively (P = 0.064). According to the multivariable analysis, the gravity in pericardial fluid analysis, receiving systemic therapy after pericardial effusion, and the time period from stage IV lung cancer to the presence of pericardial effusion were independent prognostic factors for pericardial effusion RFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have undergone simple pericardiocentesis alone for the management of NSCLC-related pericardial effusion have lower 1-year RFS rates than those who have undergone balloon pericardiotomy and surgical pericardiectomy. Therefore, balloon pericardiotomy and surgical pericardiectomy should be carried out for patients with NSCLC-related pericardial effusion if tolerable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8717440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87174402022-01-06 Recurrence of pericardial effusion after different procedure modalities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer Chang, L.-K. Kuo, Y.-W. Wu, S.-G. Chung, K.-P. Shih, J.-Y. ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Lung cancer with related pericardial effusion is not rare. Intervention is a crucial step for symptomatic effusion. It is unknown, however, whether the different invasive interventions for pericardial effusion result in different survival outcomes. This study analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have undergone different procedures. METHODS: From January 2006 to June 2018, we collected data from patients with NSCLC who have received invasive intervention for pericardial effusions. The patients were divided into three categories: simple pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, and surgical pericardiectomy. Kaplan–Meier curve and log-rank test were used to analyze the pericardial effusion recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were enrolled. Adenocarcinoma (83.6%) was the major NSCLC subtype. Invasive intervention, including simple pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, and surgical pericardiectomy, had been carried out on 52, 170, and 22 patients, respectively. The 1-year RFS rates in simple pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, and surgical pericardiectomy were 19.2%, 31.2%, and 31.8%, respectively (P = 0.128), and the median RFS was 1.67, 5.03, and 8.32 months, respectively (P = 0.008). There was no significant difference in OS, however, with the median OS at 1.67, 6.43, and 8.32 months, respectively (P = 0.064). According to the multivariable analysis, the gravity in pericardial fluid analysis, receiving systemic therapy after pericardial effusion, and the time period from stage IV lung cancer to the presence of pericardial effusion were independent prognostic factors for pericardial effusion RFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have undergone simple pericardiocentesis alone for the management of NSCLC-related pericardial effusion have lower 1-year RFS rates than those who have undergone balloon pericardiotomy and surgical pericardiectomy. Therefore, balloon pericardiotomy and surgical pericardiectomy should be carried out for patients with NSCLC-related pericardial effusion if tolerable. Elsevier 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8717440/ /pubmed/34953402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100354 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Chang, L.-K.
Kuo, Y.-W.
Wu, S.-G.
Chung, K.-P.
Shih, J.-Y.
Recurrence of pericardial effusion after different procedure modalities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
title Recurrence of pericardial effusion after different procedure modalities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
title_full Recurrence of pericardial effusion after different procedure modalities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Recurrence of pericardial effusion after different procedure modalities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Recurrence of pericardial effusion after different procedure modalities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
title_short Recurrence of pericardial effusion after different procedure modalities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
title_sort recurrence of pericardial effusion after different procedure modalities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100354
work_keys_str_mv AT changlk recurrenceofpericardialeffusionafterdifferentproceduremodalitiesinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kuoyw recurrenceofpericardialeffusionafterdifferentproceduremodalitiesinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT wusg recurrenceofpericardialeffusionafterdifferentproceduremodalitiesinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT chungkp recurrenceofpericardialeffusionafterdifferentproceduremodalitiesinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT shihjy recurrenceofpericardialeffusionafterdifferentproceduremodalitiesinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer