Cargando…

Like mother, like daughter, like granddaughter… Transgenerational ignorance engendered by a defective reproductive health technology

From 1941, the synthetic oestrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES) was administered to millions of women around the world to prevent miscarriages. In 1971, a clear and direct link was shown between taking DES during pregnancy and its subsequent long-term morbid effects on offspring. In the last 50 years, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fillion, Emmanuelle, Torny, Didier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.10.001
_version_ 1784624533577138176
author Fillion, Emmanuelle
Torny, Didier
author_facet Fillion, Emmanuelle
Torny, Didier
author_sort Fillion, Emmanuelle
collection PubMed
description From 1941, the synthetic oestrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES) was administered to millions of women around the world to prevent miscarriages. In 1971, a clear and direct link was shown between taking DES during pregnancy and its subsequent long-term morbid effects on offspring. In the last 50 years, the list of side effects of in-utero exposure to DES has grown to include cancer, infertility, significant prematurity and urogenital malformation, amongst others. Based on qualitative sociological research conducted between 2010 and 2013, compiling archives, judicial documents and 108 interviews, this article illustrates a continuous production of ignorance in France. By focusing on DES as a reproductive health technology, three aspects are stressed. First, in terms of recognition of adverse effects, despite DES being identified as a prototype for other technologies such as the contraceptive pill or hormone replacement therapy, there remained a strong reluctance to import knowledge from the USA on its dangers and risks. Second, there was indifference to transgenerational side effects: even when the most visible effects of DES were finally acknowledged, there was a lack of consideration of the health of descendants; an inability to deem the knowledge of these repercussions as emancipatory or potentially empowering for the offspring. Third, regarding the health care of DES daughters, an important propensity to undone science is highlighted, with notable indifference to the risks of hormonalization of the female body, even on the part of activists. Thus, decades after it was last given to pregnant women, the shadow of DES still lingers as a failed reproductive health technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8717442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87174422022-01-06 Like mother, like daughter, like granddaughter… Transgenerational ignorance engendered by a defective reproductive health technology Fillion, Emmanuelle Torny, Didier Reprod Biomed Soc Online Original Article From 1941, the synthetic oestrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES) was administered to millions of women around the world to prevent miscarriages. In 1971, a clear and direct link was shown between taking DES during pregnancy and its subsequent long-term morbid effects on offspring. In the last 50 years, the list of side effects of in-utero exposure to DES has grown to include cancer, infertility, significant prematurity and urogenital malformation, amongst others. Based on qualitative sociological research conducted between 2010 and 2013, compiling archives, judicial documents and 108 interviews, this article illustrates a continuous production of ignorance in France. By focusing on DES as a reproductive health technology, three aspects are stressed. First, in terms of recognition of adverse effects, despite DES being identified as a prototype for other technologies such as the contraceptive pill or hormone replacement therapy, there remained a strong reluctance to import knowledge from the USA on its dangers and risks. Second, there was indifference to transgenerational side effects: even when the most visible effects of DES were finally acknowledged, there was a lack of consideration of the health of descendants; an inability to deem the knowledge of these repercussions as emancipatory or potentially empowering for the offspring. Third, regarding the health care of DES daughters, an important propensity to undone science is highlighted, with notable indifference to the risks of hormonalization of the female body, even on the part of activists. Thus, decades after it was last given to pregnant women, the shadow of DES still lingers as a failed reproductive health technology. Elsevier 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8717442/ /pubmed/35005259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.10.001 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Fillion, Emmanuelle
Torny, Didier
Like mother, like daughter, like granddaughter… Transgenerational ignorance engendered by a defective reproductive health technology
title Like mother, like daughter, like granddaughter… Transgenerational ignorance engendered by a defective reproductive health technology
title_full Like mother, like daughter, like granddaughter… Transgenerational ignorance engendered by a defective reproductive health technology
title_fullStr Like mother, like daughter, like granddaughter… Transgenerational ignorance engendered by a defective reproductive health technology
title_full_unstemmed Like mother, like daughter, like granddaughter… Transgenerational ignorance engendered by a defective reproductive health technology
title_short Like mother, like daughter, like granddaughter… Transgenerational ignorance engendered by a defective reproductive health technology
title_sort like mother, like daughter, like granddaughter… transgenerational ignorance engendered by a defective reproductive health technology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT fillionemmanuelle likemotherlikedaughterlikegranddaughtertransgenerationalignoranceengenderedbyadefectivereproductivehealthtechnology
AT tornydidier likemotherlikedaughterlikegranddaughtertransgenerationalignoranceengenderedbyadefectivereproductivehealthtechnology